Best NFL Division?

• Ironman92

  

  What do you think?
• THE4RINGZ

  

  AFC North
• Hb31187

  

  AFC North, AFC East, NFC North, NFC South could all be argued for.
  
  Probably AFC north at the moment bc the fraud Bengals still have a good record. At the end of the season I doubt thats the case
• Little Danny

  

  Well, we know the answer is not the NFC West.
• Ironman92

  

  In order?
  
  AFC North
  NFC North
  AFC East
  NFC South
  NFC East
  AFC South
  AFC West
  NFC West
• like_that

  

  Anyone can argue with those three divisions, but anyway Steelers are the best and are the clear cut favorites to win the AFC.
  
  /idiot non
• justincredible

  

  AFC North
  NFC North
  AFC East
• Ironman92

  

  justincredible;965654 wrote:AFC North
  NFC North
  AFC East

  
  Great minds.
• OSH

  

  NFC North
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  all others
• Hb31187

  

  OSH;965745 wrote:NFC North
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  all others

  Not that far ahead lol, if at all
• Laley23

  

  NFC West. Not close.
  
  In all honesty though, NFC North. Packers are by far the best team and Detroit is one of the top 5 in the NFC with the Bears right in the WC hunt. I'd say they are more legit than the Bengals though I don't think they are very good. Minny is a pretty good bad team as well.
• OSH

  

  Hb31187;965875 wrote:Not that far ahead lol, if at all

  I know. I am just on Cloud 9 with my Packers.
  
  I didn't expect these seasons to happen like they have been. It's just nice to see it happen to the team you root for. It hasn't happened like this for several years.
• sleeper

  

  AFC North because you have 3 strong teams and then the Bengals.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  AFC North
  NFC North
  AFC East
• GOONx19

  

  Vikings are worse than the Browns. AFC North.
• Hb31187

  

  GOONx19;965990 wrote:Vikings are worse than the Browns. AFC North.

  The Vikings would demolish Cleveland. AP would run for like 200 yards lol
• Mulva

  

  NFC North slightly over AFC North
  
  Packers >> Ravens
  Lions > Bengals
  Bears << Steelers
  Vikings > Browns
• Laley23

  

  GOONx19;965990 wrote:Vikings are worse than the Browns. AFC North.

  No. Vikings are better.
  
  Plus, Packers are WAY better than anyone in the AFC North, more so than whoever is better between the Vikings and Browns, so it would more than negate that fact anyway.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  I wouldn't say the Packers are WAY better than anyone in the AFC North but I would agree they are better.
• BR1986FB

  bigdaddy2003;966577 wrote:I wouldn't say the Packers are WAY better than anyone in the AFC North but I would agree they are better.

  Yes they are. Rodgers would dice every team in the division like a Ginsu. The only team that could keep up with GB, offensively, would be Pittsburgh.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  BR1986FB;966614 wrote:Yes they are. Rodgers would dice every team in the division like a Ginsu. The only team that could keep up with GB, offensively, would be Pittsburgh.

  Tell that to the Ravens offense after dicing Steelers defense with minimal time for the game winner.
• like_that

  

  GB also diced up the Steelers D last year in the SB. The only thing that is stopping that GB offense is Rodgers having an off day imo.
• BR1986FB

  Commander of Awesome;966653 wrote:Tell that to the Ravens offense after dicing Steelers defense with minimal time for the game winner.

  Still not sold on Flacco or that offense. Too Jeckyl & Hyde.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  I can't count out the Ravens' D against the Packers. I'm not saying Rodgers wouldn't dice them up but I think they have the best chance of any D in the league to contain him. The Packers offense is however easily better than the Ravens.
• BR1986FB

  bigdaddy2003;966674 wrote:I can't count out the Ravens' D against the Packers.

  Ray Lewis stabbed you in the eyes too much. Take off the purple & black goggles.