Archive

LeBron's Stat Line....Game 5?

  • ironman02
    I'll say 25 pts, 8 assts, and 8 rebs. Heat win a close game.
  • karen lotz
    If he goes off for 35 or more, the Heat won't win. Actually more like 30+. Anything more than that when the scores are in the mid 80s and the rest of the team isn't involved enough and he will get labeled as a selfish ball hog.
  • wes_mantooth
    karen lotz;796509 wrote:If he goes off for 35 or more, the Heat won't win. Actually more like 30+. Anything more than that when the scores are in the mid 80s and the rest of the team isn't involved enough and he will get labeled as a selfish ball hog.

    I dont think anyone has ever said that he is a selfish ball hog. His passiveness has always been questioned..even as a Cav. I know a lot of the people on here got irritated at the end of games when he would kick it out to a role player for a game winning shot attempt. I do agree however that if he goes for mid to upper 30s...the Mavs win. I think the sweet spot from a Heat perspective would be around 25/8/8.
  • wildcats20
    17, 10, and 10. And 1 big ole L.
  • BCBulldog
    That may have been the most ineffective/irrelevant triple double ever.
  • riders1
    Another outstanding 2 point 4th quarter for the heat's regular season leading scorer.
  • BR1986FB
    riders1;797201 wrote:Another outstanding 2 point 4th quarter for the heat's regular season leading scorer.

    Sad part is, Mike & Mike brought up this morning that Jason Terry, in a 3+ minute span, almost outscored Lebron's 4th quarter total for the series last night.
  • Skyhook79
    karen lotz;796509 wrote:If he goes off for 35 or more, the Heat won't win. Actually more like 30+. Anything more than that when the scores are in the mid 80s and the rest of the team isn't involved enough and he will get labeled as a selfish ball hog.
    He went off for 17 and the Heat lost, if he would have went off with 35 the Heat would have won by 9. Good Call.
  • karen lotz
    Skyhook79;797206 wrote:He went off for 17 and the Heat lost, if he would have went off with 35 the Heat would have won by 9. Good Call.


    You know for sure if he scores 35 they win by 9? I'm still waiting on the Lakers to turn it on. Good Call.
  • Heretic
    Heretic;795161 wrote:17,11,8,6

    Points/Boards/Assists/TOs

    Looks like I was a lot closer than about everyone else on this thread.

    PRAISE MY INFINITE KNOWLEDGE!!!!!
  • thavoice
    Wow. 17 points.

    2 in the 4th? I guess he only scored two more points than anyone on OC did!
  • Iliketurtles
    Heretic;797710 wrote:Looks like I was a lot closer than about everyone else on this thread.

    PRAISE MY INFINITE KNOWLEDGE!!!!!
    Yeah but you didn't say if he would win or lose so your prediction doesn't count :).
  • thavoice
    WHen people were raving about Rodman and Rebounds I said this.....I think any NBA player who busts their ass and plays significant minutes should be able to get 10 boards in agame, except maybe a guard who is most responsible for being back to protect the fast break.

    LaBrum James should be able to get 10 boards in his sleep.
  • BR1986FB
    Heretic;797710 wrote:Looks like I was a lot closer than about everyone else on this thread.

    PRAISE MY INFINITE KNOWLEDGE!!!!!

    SPOT ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????#######%%%%%%% (I AM a lawyer, bitches !!!)
  • elbuckeye28
    thavoice;797741 wrote:WHen people were raving about Rodman and Rebounds I said this.....I think any NBA player who busts their ass and plays significant minutes should be able to get 10 boards in agame, except maybe a guard who is most responsible for being back to protect the fast break.

    LaBrum James should be able to get 10 boards in his sleep.

    While definitely helped by hustle, there is much more to rebounding than that.
  • BR1986FB
    Rodman was only 6'7" but he was a master at rebounding. Believe he claimed to know the angle/trajectory that the ball would carom when it left the shooters hand. Dude may have been a whack job but I respected the way he hustled (most of the time).
  • robj55
    BCBulldog;796970 wrote:That may have been the most ineffective/irrelevant triple double ever.

    it's possible to have an ineffective triple double, news to me, enlighten us please
  • robj55
    thavoice;797741 wrote:WHen people were raving about Rodman and Rebounds I said this.....I think any NBA player who busts their ass and plays significant minutes should be able to get 10 boards in agame, except maybe a guard who is most responsible for being back to protect the fast break.

    LaBrum James should be able to get 10 boards in his sleep.

    wrong, that is not all rebounding is
  • robj55
    BR1986FB;797837 wrote:Rodman was only 6'7" but he was a master at rebounding. Believe he claimed to know the angle/trajectory that the ball would carom when it left the shooters hand. Dude may have been a whack job but I respected the way he hustled (most of the time).

    rodman was the best rebounder ever in the league imo
  • Heretic
    robj55;797917 wrote:it's possible to have an ineffective triple double, news to me, enlighten us please

    When it's 17/10/10 and you pull a vanishing act during the clutch minutes of the fourth quarter. Such as (from a Yahoo column) "In the final five minutes, 59 seconds, James missed two of his three shots, had no assists, no rebounds and a turnover."
  • Wooball
    robj55;797917 wrote:it's possible to have an ineffective triple double, news to me, enlighten us please

    Maybe not completely ineffective, but ponder this:

    Lebron James: 46 minutes, 17 points/10 reb/10ast/4to
    Mario Chalmers: 23 minutes, 15 points/4reb/2ast/1to
    JJ Barea: 26 mintutes, 17 points/2 reb/5ast/1to

    I'd say if it is possible to be ineffective while putting up a triple-double, Lebron James accomplished that last night. Maybe not ineffective, but definitely inefficient.
  • Heretic
    Iliketurtles;797740 wrote:Yeah but you didn't say if he would win or lose so your prediction doesn't count :).

    :(

    My greatest moment of genius...taken away by a technicality...
  • hross34
    I think that lebron was missing in action for the entire series where he should come up big time.

    I think he made his presence felt earning that triple double but even with that performance, no one's going to forget that he had a career low 8 points for the past game.

    I think the bar was just set too high for him to live up to. It really is a different high when you are in the finals and big time players step up while the rest are in a level field.