Archive

#1 Tiger Woods defeated

  • lhslep134
    Laley23;690947 wrote:09 was his first tournament. This year was bad. But how can winning 2 rounds be poor? Thats like saying you had a bad year if you get to the Sweet 16 and lose. Tiger has been as dominant in this tournament over his career than almost anywhere.

    I mean, if the guy has the top record at the event of anyone on tour how can you say him losing round one isnt a surprise?

    I think you're stretching my comments in the wrong direction.

    I'm not saying losing round 1 isn't a surprise, I'm saying:

    A. it's not a big deal and
    B. he's lost early in 4 of the past 5 years so it's not as big of a surprise, especially because his game is lacking the most important thing he needs, confidence.
  • elbuckeye28
    ccrunner609;691750 wrote:Tiger shouldnt of been a #1. Unless we are ranking total doushebags

    You never cease to amaze.