Reds reported after smoking victory cigars in clubhouse

• Heretic

  

  If fines are levied, I hope to see a YouTube video of drunken, cigar-smoking Reds players throwing a bunch of currency on the ground, pissing on them (cocks off-camera, as only ETB and SB would want to actually see that) and then putting them in an envelope to send to wherever the cash needs to go.
• ts1227

  

  I would bet anything it was these assholes that reported it.. what's worse is the pull these motherfuckers have in the General Assembly.
  
  I couldn't remember the name of the group when I posted last night, as I was busy not engaging in model community/family behavior by drinking in excess.
  
  http://www.ccv.org/
• Ironman92

  

  every city has these awesome people who are out to follow all rusles and save the world
  
  it was so important the Reds didn't even comment
  
  LOCK EM UP!
• Skyhook79

  

  ts1227;503193 wrote:There is a strong base of moralistic douchebags around Cincinnati... most of the religious groups that have pull within the state politics are from SWO. This isn't too surprising.

  
  However they are offset by the unmoralistic douchebags around Cincinnati so its a wash.
• chicago510

  

  Here's what happens next. Reds owner Bob Castellini will receive a letter officially notifying him of the violations. Then, a health inspector must make an unannounced visit to the clubhouse sometime in the next 30 days, so, during the playoffs. If he observes anyone smoking, the team, as owners of the stadium, will be fined $100. So I'm sure the Reds are hiring a good lawyer as we speak.

  I LOLed
• georgemc80

  Im curious...if it was in the clubhouse, thats not a public venue...the field is public, but not the lockerroom
• LJ

  

  georgemc80;506381 wrote:Im curious...if it was in the clubhouse, thats not a public venue...the field is public, but not the lockerroom

  
  It's a place of employment, not a private club
• ts1227

  

  LJ;506502 wrote:It's a place of employment, not a private club

  
  Private clubs aren't exempt anyway unless they meet a laundry list of specifications. The main one is it can't have employees, which trips up basically every club. It's get nailed for smoking, or get nailed for tax evasion (paying under table to circumvent that "no employees" stipulation).
• Curly J

  

  justincredible;503107 wrote:Is this true or are you being clever?

  
  It's true, as you know, I'm not that clever.