Obama weighs in on Lebron's free agent status

• SportsAndLady

  

  SQ_Crazies wrote: You could possibly try any harder to divert the attention in this thread to some way to make me look bad? LOL

  Talk about a fucked up sentence.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  I never claimed to be a master of the English language nor have I ever tried to write on a FORUM in the same style that I would write a paper in. But I also don't try to correct people's "errors" by making errors myself. If you're going to be a big enough douche bag to be that picky then you better be correct, otherwise it's clear that you're just trollin' to make me look bad. I know you understand the sentence, and the funny thing is, you JUST did exactly what I was asking whether or not you could do.
• SportsAndLady

  

  I wasn't trying to correct you, i just couldn't understand your sentence.
• jpake1

  

  SQ_Crazies wrote: LOL...wow.
  
  Ok.
  
  "A is to B what C is to D."
  
  Would you agree that that is the correct form of "to"? Because it is...and that's basically a simple form of the sentence that I wrote. I know you Sewell taught you better than that jpake, lol.

  Yes I would agree. In that sentence, 'to' precedes a noun (A/B/C/D) would all be considered a person, place, or thing. However, in this sentence.... "No wonder our country is totally fucked, the general population (this thread being a good example) is to stupid". The word 'to' precedes an adjective since stupid is describing the general population. It is also being used in an exessive manner. That abcd stuff is not a simple form of what you said-- the complete opposite actually. Sewell did teach me well, however, I thought he would have taught you better. How much weed did you smoke this semester man?
• I Wear Pants

  SQ_Crazies wrote: I never claimed to be a master of the English language nor have I ever tried to write on a FORUM in the same style that I would write a paper in. But I also don't try to correct people's "errors" by making errors myself. If you're going to be a big enough douche bag to be that picky then you better be correct, otherwise it's clear that you're just trollin' to make me look bad. I know you understand the sentence, and the funny thing is, you JUST did exactly what I was asking whether or not you could do.

  No, you used the incorrect form of "too".
• SQ_Crazies

  

  jpake, my use of the word was correct. You need to go back and read the post. You aren't including my entire sentence, which is why you think I'm wrong.
• jpake1

  

  I did read the post, the second part of the sentence doesn't really make sense. It's missing something.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  SportsAndLady wrote: I wasn't trying to correct you, i just couldn't understand your sentence.

  Ok.
  
  Is there any possible way that you could try to divert the attention away from you being an idiot in this thread, on to making me look stupid any more than you already have? The answer is yes, I already know that, because you've already done it. Every response is just another way to try and make me look bad, even in your "man up" attempt of admitting you were wrong.
  
  And I Wear Pants, no, I did use the correct form of the word. READ THE WHOLE GOD DAMNED SENTENCE.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  LOL...I think my point has been very firmly proven here. Even after we confirm that I was correct, there are still doubters.
• SportsAndLady

  

  SQ_Crazies wrote:blah blah blah i like cock

• SQ_Crazies

  

  SQ_Crazies wrote: the general population is to stupid what a room full of 8 dudes fucking 9 dudes is to gay.

  I edited some things out to make it as basic and simple as I could for you folks.
  
  In other words, like I said, A is to B what C is to D.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  SportsAndLady wrote:

  SQ_Crazies wrote:blah blah blah i like cock

  LOL...still doing it.
• Nate

  the general population (this thread being a good example) is to stupid what a room full of 8 dudes fucking 9 dudes is to gay.

  Took me a while to understands SQ's argument..
  
  The general population is to stupid as a room full of 8 dudes fucking 9 dudes is to gay.
  
  A is to B as C is to D.
  
  Took me a while to translate it but "to" is the proper form of the word.
• jpake1

  

  A is to B what C is to D. A complex version of that is.... Columbus is to Ohio what Austin is to Texas. In both of those... ABCD and Cbus/Ohio/Austin/Texas are all nouns (places or things). In your actual sentence...
  
  No wonder our country is totally fucked, the general population (this thread being a good example) is to stupid what a room full of 8 dudes fucking 9 dudes is to gay. General population and a room full of 8 dudes would be the nouns, however, to stupid and to gay are the adjectives describing the nouns. In you're example, you've got 4 nouns working. In the actual sentence, you've got two nouns and two adjectives describing the nouns.
• Nate

  Both stupid and gay can be used as nouns. Grab a dictionary.
• jpake1

  

  Hey, maybe I'm wrong, if I am then I'm the dumb dumb. I just thought there was a difference in use depending on if it precedes a noun/adjective. Where are the english majors?! Come help, teach me up so I don't make mistakes on my resume.
• Quint

  

  I've loled at this entire conversation! "To" was correct! I think we need a grammar thread! Obviously the boring sports world offers no topics to argue about? Hahaha!
• jpake1

  

  I think I get what he was going for now using gay and stupid as nouns.
• jpake1

  

  Quint wrote: I've loled at this entire conversation! "To" was correct! I think we need a grammar thread! Obviously the boring sports world offers no topics to argue about? Hahaha!

  It really doesn't. NBA playoffs suck right now. Hockey isn't a HUGE sport for Americans. Baseball is just rolling around. I don't like this time of the year if the NBA playoffs aren't really good.
• I Wear Pants

  Oh, the reason that we didn't get what SQ was saying is that it was too stupid to be able to comprehend.
• Glory Days

  

  
• jpake1

  

  That's creepy.
• Heretic

  

  This thread has reached an epic level of awesomeness that few ever attain.
  
  
• SQ_Crazies

  

  I Wear Pants wrote: Oh, the reason that we didn't get what SQ was saying is that it was too stupid to be able to comprehend.

  There is a difference between something being too stupid to comprehend and you being too stupid to comprehend it. For instance, quantum physics isn't too stupid to comprehend, but with the knowledge I have now, I'm too stupid to comprehend it. But I don't hold it against you, everyone makes mistakes.
  
  This was mainly about S&L. Because, ever since the "collapse" thread, he and a few others have gone out of their way to make me look like a fool. I've said in multiple other threads that the whole thing just needs to be dropped because we can't even have a normal discussion around here anymore. Certain people chime in just to try and make me look bad, and it muddies up threads with a bunch of BS. This one being a prime example--especially when they're wrong in trying to do it. We had a 3 page debate over whether I used the right form of "to" in a thread about the President speaking on LeBron's FA. And it just goes to show you how far out of their way they'll go to make me look bad--and as I pointed out, even after he was shown the way, he STILL tried to turn it around on me. I can take it. Trust me, I'm not sitting here crying about it. Just sayin', it's rather annoying to not be able to have some actual conversation because certain people didn't believe me when I said they misinterpreted my thread. And even then, regardless of whether you believe it was misinterpreted or not, the joke has lost it's punch. Furthermore, if I were to go through old threads, I could dig up shit from just about anyone that would make them look stupid in hindsight. It's just time to move on from it. Like I said, I can take it, but it just ruins good conversation. There are certain people that make jokes about it at the start (TB23 for example) who have since dropped it because they'd rather have some real discussion. Some people just need to grow the fuck up.
• Nate

  SQ_Crazies wrote:

  I Wear Pants wrote: Oh, the reason that we didn't get what SQ was saying is that it was too stupid to be able to comprehend.

  There is a difference between something being too stupid to comprehend and you being too stupid to comprehend it. For instance, quantum physics isn't too stupid to comprehend, but with the knowledge I have now, I'm too stupid to comprehend it. But I don't hold it against you, everyone makes mistakes.
  
  This was mainly about S&L. Because, ever since the "collapse" thread, he and a few others have gone out of their way to make me look like a fool. I've said in multiple other threads that the whole thing just needs to be dropped because we can't even have a normal discussion around here anymore. Certain people chime in just to try and make me look bad, and it muddies up threads with a bunch of BS. This one being a prime example--especially when they're wrong in trying to do it. We had a 3 page debate over whether I used the right form of "to" in a thread about the President speaking on LeBron's FA. And it just goes to show you how far out of their way they'll go to make me look bad--and as I pointed out, even after he was shown the way, he STILL tried to turn it around on me. I can take it. Trust me, I'm not sitting here crying about it. Just sayin', it's rather annoying to not be able to have some actual conversation because certain people didn't believe me when I said they misinterpreted my thread. And even then, regardless of whether you believe it was misinterpreted or not, the joke has lost it's punch. Furthermore, if I were to go through old threads, I could dig up shit from just about anyone that would make them look stupid in hindsight. It's just time to move on from it. Like I said, I can take it, but it just ruins good conversation. There are certain people that make jokes about it at the start (TB23 for example) who have since dropped it because they'd rather have some real discussion. Some people just need to grow the fuck up.

  Agreed.