Ohio Chatter DEV

OhioStatePride2003

Says he's a long shot, but still...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/14/jamarcus-russell-looks-like-a-long-shot-with-the-bengals/

BR1986FB

Backup right tackle.

Al Capone

I dont see this as to surprising, the Bungals have needed a qb for 3 years now. Make the move Mike.

gerb131

He could be the re-incarnation of Jeff Blake. Everyone run 68 yards and throw it up.

jordo212000

I like the move. Low risk high reward. At the end of the day he can't be any worse than Jordan Palmer.

Azubuike24

For a 3rd stringer QB I don't see why it would be a bad idea?

Mr. 300

Good idea....everyone need a throw away LSU grad on their team.

newarkcatholicfan

Old news.

Mooney44Cards

This would double the amount of QBs who were good in college but blow in the NFL on the Bengals roster.

jordo212000

I read on Profootballtalk that this probably isn't going to happen. Apparently Russell isn't exactly in a hurry to talk to teams

Speedofsand

When JaMarcus Russell steps back from the center snap, he goes "beep beep beep".

Speedofsand

DeyDurkie5

Speedofsand wrote: When JaMarcus Russell steps back from the center snap, he goes "beep beep beep".

skank

I didn't know JaMarcus had a felony.

skank

Now if he just rapes a chick....Hello Pittsburgh.

gut

A lot of CIN fans might be shocked they could actually be a better team with Jamarcus. But the shine is finally starting to wear off that turd (I'm talking about Palmer, not Russell).

mtrulz

Why the hell do all of you Cleveland fans decide to troll a Bengal thread?

38-35-0

skank

Yeah your right....We're sorry, no one ever does this to Cleveland threads, so we shouldn't do it to others.

skank

mtrulz wrote: Why the hell do all of you Cleveland fans decide to troll a Bengal thread?

[size=xx-large]38-35-0[/size]

Is this where the series stands now? Really? Wow. We had no team for three years....Then we sucked for the last 11 years....and your only up 3 games on us? Wow, you guys really suck.

Al Capone

HAHAHA. Cleveland dont have a winning record against anybody. Not even the Bungals. LOL.

jordo212000

skank wrote: Is this where the series stands now? Really? Wow. We had no team for three years....Then we sucked for the last 11 years....and your only up 3 games on us? Wow, you guys really suck.

Is this the level you want to stoop to? haha. I am in disbelief that somebody would actually find a positive spin on that. The whole thing makes me laugh and tells me everything I need to know about Browns fans. If the Bengals have 'really sucked', then how would you describe the Browns play?

skank

jordo212000 wrote:
skank wrote: Is this where the series stands now? Really? Wow. We had no team for three years....Then we sucked for the last 11 years....and your only up 3 games on us? Wow, you guys really suck.
Is this the level you want to stoop to? haha. I am in disbelief that somebody would actually find a positive spin on that. The whole thing makes me laugh and tells me everything I need to know about Browns fans. If the Bengals have 'really sucked', then how would you describe the Browns play?

Ah....Read much? Read my post again, I said we had to start from scratch....build another team....SUCKED for the last 11 years....I mean EPICLY....We play twice a year....and after all of that, you guys only Have a 3 game lead on us? I think that says volumes about the Bengals....More about them then us.

jordo212000

skank wrote: Ah....Read much? Read my post again, I said we had to start from scratch....build another team....SUCKED for the last 11 years....I mean EPICLY....We play twice a year....and after all of that, you guys only Have a 3 game lead on us? I think that says volumes about the Bengals....More about them then us.

At the end of the day the Bengals still have 3 wins on them. Meaning they have the better record (i.e. more wins). I don't care how they got them, that's the only thing that matters. It's not anybody's fault that the Browns sucked majorly the past 11 years and have been completely rudderless. You want to discount victories against the Browns because they were bad? You do realize that the Bengals weren't very good during that same time period, yet they still have more wins.

This whole thing is comical to me. "Oh yeah? Well you must really suck! You have only beat my team more times! You should have won more than that!"

skank

jordo212000 wrote:
skank wrote: Ah....Read much? Read my post again, I said we had to start from scratch....build another team....SUCKED for the last 11 years....I mean EPICLY....We play twice a year....and after all of that, you guys only Have a 3 game lead on us? I think that says volumes about the Bengals....More about them then us.
At the end of the day the Bengals still have 3 wins on them. Meaning they have the better record (i.e. more wins). I don't care how they got them, that's the only thing that matters. It's not anybody's fault that the Browns sucked majorly the past 11 years and have been completely rudderless. You want to discount victories against the Browns because they were bad? You do realize that the Bengals weren't very good during that same time period, yet they still have more wins.

This whole thing is comical to me. "Oh yeah? Well you must really suck! You have only beat my team more times! You should have won more than that!"

The funny thing is that, 11 years of VERY bad football by the Browns, that is 11 years, we play twice a season, that's 22 games, (22 games during our VERY bad 11 seasons) and you guys have a 3 game lead in the series? That to me is pathetic. you should have pulled away by now.

jordo212000

skank wrote: The funny thing is that, 11 years of VERY bad football by the Browns, that is 11 years, we play twice a season, that's 22 games, (22 games during our VERY bad 11 seasons) and you guys have a 3 game lead in the series? That to me is pathetic. you should have pulled away by now.

Whatever you say man.

Archive

Ha! Bengals Interested in JaMarcus Russell?