Joakim Noah

• SQ_Crazies

  

  LOL...I'm not even going to bother correcting you guys. I'm just going to continue watching you make yourselves look stupid.
• Hb31187

  

  So how is denial treating you SQ?
• SQ_Crazies

  

  Denial? LOL...
• Hb31187

  

  In denial that you're EVER wrong about ANYTHING. Including peoples opinions haha. And when its 50-1....We're the ones that "look stupid" haha.
• devil1197

  LOL, LOL
• SQ_Crazies

  

  Alright, just so you guys don't bother wasting any more time...
  
  I had already said that I think he's a pretty good player earlier in the thread, then this:
  
  

  jpake1 wrote: Now that I think about it. Noah and SQ are very much alike. I mean, one sucks at basketball. But both of them like to cause shit on and off the court.

  SQ_Crazies wrote: Dude, he does suck.

  It was a joke. I'm sorry that you guys have a hard time following.
  
  Also, if you want to talk about AV's HOF potential, you might want to include my entire argument which included some big IFs...rather than running around like a chicken with tourettes saying that I said he'd be in the HOF some day. But I don't really care, just trying to help you guys avoid looking more retarded than you've already managed.
• devil1197

  Hard time following?
  
  The way you say dumbass things constantly, how could we misinterpret you saying "Dude, he does suck" as being a joke and not your opinion?
• SQ_Crazies

  

  Maybe because of the fact that I said he was good earlier in the thread and the post that was RIGHT ABOVE where I said he sucks. It isn't my fault that your mental capacity is that of a mouse.
• devil1197

  SQ_Crazies wrote: Maybe because of the fact that I said he was good earlier in the thread and the post that was RIGHT ABOVE where I said he sucks. It isn't my fault that your mental capacity is that of a mouse.

  Like I said, your posts are that of a bi polar person.
  
  I mean how could I get the impression that you think he is good when you say that Darnell Jackson could put up those numbers. Or when you say that you could put up those same numbers against Cleveland.
  
  You contradict yourself so much. Either he is good or it was because Cleveland lacked defensive intensity.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  Because like I've stated many, many times (especially recently it seems) there are too many people around here who pick up on 4 words in a post and interpret it wrong rather than taking in the entire post. And that isn't my fault, so I'm not sure what you want me to do about it.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  It's just funny that I say "Dude, he does suck." and you guys are all soooooooo into trying to break my balls that you let that get in the way of your brain working properly. I mean, it couldn't have been more obvious. But like I said, it's not my fault that your mental capacity is that of a mouse and you can't follow or keep up in a conversation.
• devil1197

  Listen, you bash Noah saying Jackson and yourself could put up those numbers. That Cleveland let him do what he did in Game 2 too easily. But now you are saying he is good all of the sudden.
  
  Which is it?
• SQ_Crazies

  

  LMAO...it's all in here already, you're just further proving my point that it's so easy for me to say something to get you guys to flip shit. No slam on you, I'm actually very good at it--it's why a lot of people that know me think I should be a writer. I'm good at stirring the pot, but it isn't my fault that you get caught up in it. Intelligent people are able to take in my entire argument and not trip out on 4 words and see what I mean.
• devil1197

  No, you are just bi-polar.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  SMH...I'd love to continue but I'm off to climb some cliffs and smoke a J on the top of a waterfall. Which seems way more interesting than arguing with your stupid ass.
• devil1197

  
• Glory Days

  

  
• hoops23

  

  devil1197 wrote:

  SQ_Crazies wrote: Maybe because of the fact that I said he was good earlier in the thread and the post that was RIGHT ABOVE where I said he sucks. It isn't my fault that your mental capacity is that of a mouse.

  Like I said, your posts are that of a bi polar person.
  
  I mean how could I get the impression that you think he is good when you say that Darnell Jackson could put up those numbers. Or when you say that you could put up those same numbers against Cleveland.
  
  You contradict yourself so much. Either he is good or it was because Cleveland lacked defensive intensity.

  lol.
• hoops23

  

  SQ_Crazies wrote: LMAO...it's all in here already, you're just further proving my point that it's so easy for me to say something to get you guys to flip shit. No slam on you, I'm actually very good at it--it's why a lot of people that know me think I should be a writer. I'm good at stirring the pot, but it isn't my fault that you get caught up in it. Intelligent people are able to take in my entire argument and not trip out on 4 words and see what I mean.

  lol again.
  
  Sage owns you every single fucking time you guys argue. It's so hilarious to see you get so worked up.
  
  Me, I just prove my point and move on.. You can't hold a valid debate because you throw out LAME insults like "OMG, because you don't agree with me your brain isn't working"..
  
  haha.
• jpake1

  

  I've been waiting for the day Cavs fans start to turn on SQ. Seems like more and more are jumping on the train.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  It's amusing that you think any of you actually get me worked up.
• jpake1

  

  I don't know if you get "worked up", but I think there is more here than just posting ideas on a forum. Just sayin'; cuz I don't think the last comment was for me.
• SQ_Crazies

  

  lol
• jpake1

  

  You can laugh, that's your opinion.
• assumption

  thedynasty1998 wrote: I used to hate him in college, but I have to be honest, I actually respect his game. I never thought he'd be half the NBA player that he is now.

  Agreed! Does more with less natural ability. Seems as though many people bash Cleveland.............and Detroit.