LOL

• sleeper

  

  People can't handle the free market being criticized on a relevant thread talking about how important law and regulations are to a functioning economy.
  
  Remove regulations and the UA incident are related but I guess Justin has chosen censorship instead of allowing rational thought. The irony is real.
• justincredible

  

  I guess so.
• sleeper

  

  justincredible;1847077 wrote:I guess so.

  Classic response from "leadership".
• like_that

  

  justincredible;1847077 wrote:I guess so.

  +1, would read again.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Sleeper still butthurt?
  
  *come to this thread*
  
  Yep, guess so!
• Sonofanump

  sleeper;1847059 wrote: rational thought.

  LOL
• gut

  SportsAndLady;1847104 wrote:Sleeper still butthurt?
  
  *come to this thread*
  
  Yep, guess so!

  
  I'm starting to think this is the real Sleeper and the old one was the troll.
• Gardens35

  gut;1847202 wrote:I'm starting to think this is the real Sleeper and the old one was the troll.

  Gosh a ruddies.
• Heretic

  

  SportsAndLady;1847104 wrote:Sleeper still butthurt?
  
  *come to this thread*
  
  Yep, guess so!

  And that's why everyone is LOLing, I think.
• ts1227

  

  Heretic;1847280 wrote:And that's why everyone is LOLing, I think.

  Meh, after 10 years of playing the contrarian troll, there's not much left to laugh about it.
• justincredible

  

  I'm not laughing because this is serious business.
• sleeper

  

  justincredible;1847295 wrote:I'm not laughing because this is serious business.

  Apparently it is. Banning users talking about airline regulations on a thread about airlines.
  
  Very serious.
• justincredible

  

  sleeper;1847296 wrote:Apparently it is. Banning users talking about airline regulations on a thread about airlines.
  
  Very serious.

  I saw it as pretty blatant political trolling on a thread outside of the politics forum. I took action that I, as the owner of the site, deemed appropriate given the situation. You can continue your tantrum if you'd like, but it isn't really doing anything to further your cause.
• sleeper

  

  justincredible;1847299 wrote:I saw it as pretty blatant political trolling on a thread outside of the politics forum. I took action that I, as the owner of the site, deemed appropriate given the situation. You can continue your tantrum if you'd like, but it isn't really doing anything to further your cause.

  No worries. Hey when are you going to do something about the blatant trolling that's rampant in other forums?
• Heretic

  

  sleeper;1847300 wrote:No worries. Hey when are you going to do something about the blatant trolling that's rampant in other forums?

  You mean, like you completely changing your political leanings to suddenly become a left-wing QQuaker on the politics forum? Or you deciding to blow everyone's comments on low-level NBA types, turning "hopefully they can give good minutes off the bench" to "look at how bad everyone's All-Star is" on the Pro Sports forum?
  
  Well, we can look into that if you want!
• sleeper

  

  Heretic;1847307 wrote:You mean, like you completely changing your political leanings to suddenly become a left-wing QQuaker on the politics forum? Or you deciding to blow everyone's comments on low-level NBA types, turning "hopefully they can give good minutes off the bench" to "look at how bad everyone's All-Star is" on the Pro Sports forum?
  
  Well, we can look into that if you want!

  My political leanings don't change because of the people on this forum. My political leanings changed once this country decided to elect Donald Trump, a reality TV star who can barely speak english to the Presidency.
  
  And apologies for being the voice of reason in the Pro Sports forum. I guess we should rename that forum to "Delusional sports forum, where D-league talent that hasn't played in 2 years is going to make an impact on a championship level team".
• SportsAndLady

  

  sleeper;1847309 wrote:My political leanings don't change because of the people on this forum. My political leanings changed once this country decided to elect Donald Trump, a reality TV star who can barely speak english to the Presidency.
  
  And apologies for being the voice of reason in the Pro Sports forum. I guess we should rename that forum to "Delusional sports forum, where D-league talent that hasn't played in 2 years is going to make an impact on a championship level team".

  QQ
• like_that

  

  Heretic;1847307 wrote:You mean, like you completely changing your political leanings to suddenly become a left-wing QQuaker on the politics forum? Or you deciding to blow everyone's comments on low-level NBA types, turning "hopefully they can give good minutes off the bench" to "look at how bad everyone's All-Star is" on the Pro Sports forum?
  
  Well, we can look into that if you want!

  Rekt.
• FatHobbit

  

  We should rename every forum whenever sleeper can't get his way.
• like_that

  

  FatHobbit;1847320 wrote:We should rename every forum whenever sleeper can't get his way.

  He can't help, but try to make a thread about himself. I've never seen someone so desperate for acknowledged credibility on an anonymous Internet forum.
  Insecure sleeper in a nutshell.
• sleeper

  

  FatHobbit;1847320 wrote:We should rename every forum whenever sleeper can't get his way.

  Forum titles should reflect the content in the forum. Sorry for proposing ideas to make the forums a better place rather than just rejecting anything that isn't the status quo.
• sleeper

  

  like_that;1847327 wrote:He can't help, but try to make a thread about himself. I've never seen someone so desperate for acknowledged credibility on an anonymous Internet forum.
  Insecure sleeper in a nutshell.

  The only people that make the thread about me are other people who don't have the ability to form a coherent thought and would rather just openly flame until their sycophants join them.
• fish82

  

  
• QuakerOats

  sleeper;1847330 wrote:Forum titles should reflect the content in the forum. Sorry for proposing ideas to make the forums a better place rather than just rejecting anything that isn't the status quo.

  
  Resist
• FatHobbit

  

  sleeper;1847330 wrote:Forum titles should reflect the content in the forum. Sorry for proposing ideas to make the forums a better place rather than just rejecting anything that isn't the status quo.

  I disagree. The content should follow the titles. If someone wants to post about politics, they should do it in the political forum. If they want to post about sports, they should do it in the sports forum.