sleeper;1842005 wrote:Yeah how horrible. Judge more please.
Do conservatives get their rocks off to their high horse moral superiority attitude? The party of "Only God can judge" sure does a lot of judging. Embarrassing.
Wait, you're still trying to hold onto your full bleed heart liberal shtick? LOL
I am not 100% sure, but if I am not mistaken, I don't believe Dr. Boogie is a conservative. Also, he was giving an example of using the phrase "yeah, that's a thing." Try not being such a triggered cry baby. Just give up the act man, and bring the old sleeper back.
While we are at it, let's check out your posts on gay people:
sleeper;1615290 wrote:This. Gay people need to stop pretending they are special. They are not.
Zoltan;1615319 wrote:I don't see why more people aren't admitting it grossed them out a little. I don't care if gay people get married, adopt kids, whatever. I'm still allowed to be a little grossed out by two men kissing.
Most of my straight male friends would admit the same thing in private as well, even though they fundamentally support gay rights.
sleeper;1615327 wrote:This. It was definitely gross.
sleeper;1615378 wrote:Exactly. So can gays go back to the bedroom and stop shoving their sexuality in everyone's face? If its so "normal" we don't need this constant media uproar every time a gay does anything.
Being gay is not special and thinking its gross is not wrong either. When is the gay lobby going to grow up? Gay people are worse than vegetarians; you'll be sitting there talking about the latest football game and a vegetarian will tell you how football is disgusting because it was once made from pig skin. It's the same with gays. You'll buy a new lawn mower and they will say "Yeah well my boyfriend is gay and the store manager looked at him funny so he's homophobe and no one should shop there".
tl;dr: I don't care about gays.
sleeper;1615382 wrote:I think what we need is a straight lobby. We will simply go around talking about how great it is to be straight and if any gay man tries to tell us otherwise we will go to the media and complain that they gay man disagrees with our views and therefore hates us. We will actively attach ourselves to every issue, including marathons and non-sexual conventions and if anyone stops us they are heterophobes and demand an apology and financial benefits.
sleeper;1615383 wrote:I don't really see gay people coming out against it though. They clearly love it and/or benefit from the ruthless blood sucking gay lobby.
sleeper;1615386 wrote:Equal treatment? LOL
Do you really believe gays are being treated unfairly? Even most states have 'civil unions' which allows you to legally becoming one which is essentially marriage. The gay lobby is using propaganda to EARN MONEY from dumb gays and straights to fight for the cause. You clearly have been hoodwinked, which doesn't shock me since you went to a glorified community college. It's the same shit as the NAACP, the breast cancer scam, the women's rights movement, etc. Equal treatment for gays is already here, you just need to grow up.
sleeper;1615387 wrote:Funny also equal treatment means having a 7th round draft pick get extra camera time kissing his gay boyfriend. How about coming out against using gays to sell dramatic stories? How does it feel to have the one societal benefit of being gay to help media companies sell advertisements? How about coming out in support of people who don't agree with you and allowing them to have their opinions without repercussions?
You don't want equal treatment, you want unequal treatment and you can't tell the difference because you went to a glorified community college.
sleeper;1615392 wrote:Cute but equal is equal. What you want, and what the gays want, is they want to be more equal. When are they going to grow up? The reality is never because there is money to be made on stupid fucks like gays.
sleeper;1615399 wrote:Naw bro. I'm straight so I don't cry to everyone because someone doesn't agree with me. If I did, that would be pretty gay.
sleeper;1615481 wrote:There was also another guy who just came out and actually tweeted someone like "I'm the first gay player to play in this league" or whatever. He plays for some trash school somewhere and clearly is using the gay cause for his own personal gain.
That is what the gay agenda is to me; all about money.
sleeper;1615488 wrote:I think he understands what it means. He's expressing frustration in society at large that cares so much about the private opinions of others'. Society is just a bunch of whiny bitches. Oh no someone thinks two men kissing is weird and gross; condemn them!
Society needs to grow up and gays need to get a life.
sleeper;1615540 wrote:I find abortion to be particularly disgusting but it has nothing to do with me. Maybe we should all just admit that some things gross us out and stop spewing cliche lines like this.
This isn't really about gays, but I had to include this for the irony considering sleeper now goes out of his way to turn every thread into an abortion argument.
sleeper;1615541 wrote:Actually I think it should be. We clearly protect one side of speech, the declaration of being gay now has protection in the work against discrimination. Why is the other side of being a bigot not protected since that is also protecting what someone does rather than who he is?
sleeper;1616464 wrote:Why the fuck does one need to come out? Do people who fuck dogs have to tell everyone of their sexuality? When are gays going to realize we don't care; WE DON'T FUCKING CARE.
sleeper;1616465 wrote:I've had sex with a staggering amount of women and have yet to use a condom. Never gotten a girl pregnant and I don't have any STDs. STDs are for the gays.
sleeper;1616506 wrote:The reality is, gays will always be seen as inferior to straight people because they have needs that straight people don't have. Why should expect to be treated as equals when they openly embrace their inferiority?
sleeper;1616514 wrote:I don't. I just enjoy pointing our hypocrisy and shredding PC cliche that ruin logical thought in society.
sleeper;1616515 wrote:The need for validation that their lifestyle is okay. A being that has more needs is inferior to someone who does not require those needs to be equal.
For example, as a straight man, I don't need validation that having sex with women is okay. I just go out and have sex with women. For gays, they need to tell others they are gay and have it validated by their friends, family, and any random stranger. The logic is simple and perfect; although not very PC.
sleeper;1616517 wrote:The gay agenda has ruined my sympathy for gay people and made me actively enjoy their misery for their abnormal and gross lifestyle.
sleeper;1616518 wrote:Condoms are for poor people and gays.
sleeper;1616533 wrote:Maybe. If that's the case, why isn't the gay community condemning Michael Sam for making a big deal out of coming out? The gay community doesn't seem to be interested in marginalizing their sexual choices; they seem more interested in blasting it everywhere and trying to score sympathy points for those that don't accept(keyword) but tolerate their lifestyle.
sleeper;1616636 wrote:I don't bang girls at bars. I take them home. Not sure why gays have the need to tell everyone and their mom what they do in the bedroom.
sleeper;1616637 wrote:This. And if he somehow got drafted and kissed a boy on TV and the world was outraged he could simply state: "He's my boyfriend, I don't see the big deal. Stay out of my personal life".
He did this for money since he's never going to play in the league anyway.
I don't think evidence-based is a fluff word. Evidence-based literature is more valuable than the alternative. It's used in all areas of the medical world to describe clinical practices that are actually founded on meaningful data.
"Woke" is starting to get pretty annoying.
Butthurt makes me butthurt.
Gains
"A thing" as in "A coupless-gay-pet-wedding-baby-shower? Yeah, that's a thing." I picture some hipster from Brooklyn with heavy frame plastic glass lenses saying it. Oh God.....
I have young boys. I get to hear all the "cool" words.