Twitter Banner Mount Rushmore Poll (Final Spot)

• Sonofanump

  No Gibwok on the poll?
• SnotBubbles

  

  Coin flip between Rose, Brown and Brown on who should be there.
  
  I went with Rose. He would be the most nationally recognizable face on it and his accomplishments on the field are probably the hardest to argue against. Plus I like baseball.
• justincredible

  

  thavoice;1838130 wrote:I agree. State has 4 of those teams including the oldest franchise with the reds. If griffey had best years here he would have been a no brainer. I would take out the golf and track guy and open it up to voting. I went with larkin

  Are you sure about that? I voted for Larkin as well and he still only has 1 vote.
• Laley23

  

  justincredible;1838157 wrote:Are you sure about that? I voted for Larkin as well and he still only has 1 vote.

  probably voted for Jim Brown, but doesn't want to admit it.
• j_crazy

  

  shocked that woody hayes isn't the guy.
• Laley23

  

  j_crazy;1838192 wrote:shocked that woody hayes isn't the guy.

  Not as many OSU fans on here as you'd think, and even less, I'd wager, on this forum.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Laley23;1838211 wrote:Not as many OSU fans on here as you'd think, and even less, I'd wager, on this forum.

  Also not that many OSU fans who grew up watching Woody.
• vball10set

  Laley23;1838211 wrote:Not as many OSU fans on here as you'd think, and even less, I'd wager, on this forum.

  not too sure I agree with this?
• SportsAndLady

  

  justincredible;1838157 wrote:Are you sure about that? I voted for Larkin as well and he still only has 1 vote.

  Thadumbass
• like_that

  

  Btw, my issue with Rose and the reason I didn't vote for him is because he is only recognized as a good player due to his longevity.
• justincredible

  

  like_that;1838275 wrote:Btw, my issue with Rose and the reason I didn't vote for him is because he is only recognized as a good player due to his longevity.

  I don't think that's the only reason he's recognized as a good player, but it's probably the biggest reason due to compiling 4256 hits. He would still have HOF numbers if you threw out his last 5 or 6 (maybe a couple more) seasons.
  
  According to baseball-reference his black ink HOF monitor for his career is 64 (14th all time) and the average black ink for a HOFer is 27. He had a 58 through his age 37 season.
• like_that

  

  justincredible;1838276 wrote:I don't think that's the only reason he's recognized as a good player, but it's probably the biggest reason due to compiling 4256 hits. He would still have HOF numbers if you threw out his last 5 or 6 (maybe a couple more) seasons.
  
  According to baseball-reference his black ink HOF monitor for his career is 64 (14th all time) and the average black ink for a HOFer is 27. He had a 58 through his age 37 season.

  That was sarcasm. I don't think you were around when gut made this argument. I am just poking fun at him. Rose is clearly is a HOF caliber player.
• justincredible

  

  Well don't I feel silly.
• Ironman92

  

  like_that;1838282 wrote:That was sarcasm. I don't think you were around when gut made this argument. I am just poking fun at him. Rose is clearly is a HOF caliber player.

  Shit, you got me too. I had a big tl;dr ready
  
  Damn you lol
  
  Anyways cut off his last 6 years and had 3500+ hits and 650+ doubles [emoji3]....before age 40