Churches Paying Taxes
-
Manhattan Buckeyesleeper;1585668 wrote:Stop calling sales "donations" and there you have it. Revenue minus expenses = profit. Tax the profit.
There isn't profit. Churches don't have shareholders that get residuals. Any excess revenue is kept as such, a rainy day fund.
Again, what are you taxing? -
fish82
Yeah....not your best work.Devils Advocate;1585785 wrote:I guess you don't get it.
They are both wrong because of their base belief. here is the problem
2+2=4 ~ logic and provable
Westboro 2+2=4 Fagguts go to hell~ WRONG
Most Christians~ 2+2= the holy trinity and God sent his only son....blah blah blah~ Wrong
Both are wrong, you just don't like Westboro's answers.
-
fish82
I'm not sure why he can't wrap his mind around this fact.Manhattan Buckeye;1585790 wrote:There isn't profit. Churches don't have shareholders that get residuals. Any excess revenue is kept as such, a rainy day fund.
Again, what are you taxing?
Me thinks he's just being dumb on purpose to stir the pot a little. -
TiernanI'd sure like to know how much that smiling dipshit Joel Oelstein with the mega Christian Houston church makes and all the other smiling hypocrites inside pay that fucker every year. But because its not a public Corp we'll never know what that money sucking machine pulls in every year.
-
OSH
Whatever the decision, I am 100% against the government adding any more taxes before we get this mess figured out first.
Just what we need, the government getting more money to spend wrong. -
WebFire
That's the best point in this whole thread.OSH;1585895 wrote:Whatever the decision, I am 100% against the government adding any more taxes before we get this mess figured out first.
Just what we need, the government getting more money to spend wrong. -
rmolin73
Close it down folks.OSH;1585895 wrote:Whatever the decision, I am 100% against the government adding any more taxes before we get this mess figured out first.
Just what we need, the government getting more money to spend wrong.