Archive

MSFT Excel Formula

  • ernest_t_bass
    What'd be the formula to calculate hours worked in a day, given the scenario?

  • Commander of Awesome
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel-help/add-or-subtract-time-HA102809662.aspx
  • ernest_t_bass
    Hmm... google. Who'da thunk it.
  • Commander of Awesome
  • ernest_t_bass
    Commander of Awesome;1576312 wrote:

    /etb'd
  • QuakerOats
    Why work; food, shelter, clothing, cell phones, and a snap card balance you can trade for drugs are easily obtainable - tax free, no less !!



    Change we can believe in ...
  • Commander of Awesome
    You do realize that unemployment has been going down since Obamaa took over office...... Kinda makes your statement even more moronic.
  • Heretic
    QuakerOats;1576315 wrote:Why work; food, shelter, clothing, cell phones, and a snap card balance you can trade for drugs are easily obtainable - tax free, no less !!



    Change we can believe in ...
    Well, now that CC's been neg'd to oblivion, we have a new candidate with Mr. Make Stupid-Ass Politard Comments in Non-Political Forums.
  • QuakerOats
    Commander of Awesome;1576317 wrote:You do realize that unemployment has been going down since Obamaa took over office...... Kinda makes your statement even more moronic.


    You do realize that fewer people are working today than when obama took office. Or maybe you didn't realize that because .................................you listen to obama.
  • Commander of Awesome
    Heretic;1576318 wrote:Well, now that CC's been neg'd to oblivion, we have a new candidate with Mr. Make Stupid-Ass Politard Comments in Non-Political Forums.
    All in favor say I.

    I
  • Commander of Awesome
    QuakerOats;1576320 wrote:You do realize that fewer people are working today than when obama took office. Or maybe you didn't realize that because .................................you listen to obama.
    That's not accurate. Obama took office in 2009, and current UE is at it's lowest since 2007, pre recession and while Bush was in office.
  • QuakerOats
    It is accurate. The only reason the UE 'rate' has declined is because many of the long-term unemployed gave up looking for work so they are no longer counted in the equation. However, as I stated, the number of people actually working is lower today than 5 years ago. And the number of 'long-term' unemployed is at a record level.

    Good luck.
  • Commander of Awesome
    QuakerOats;1576328 wrote:It is accurate. The only reason the UE 'rate' has declined is because many of the long-term unemployed gave up looking for work so they are no longer counted in the equation. However, as I stated, the number of people actually working is lower today than 5 years ago. And the number of 'long-term' unemployed is at a record level.

    Good luck.
    Most of the long termed UE are the baby boomers. As most of them go on Social Security I'd expect the number of people working to continue to decline. The rate is solid measure bc it takes that into account. Hope this helps.
  • dlazz
    Guys, this thread is about etb's stupid fucking question, not unemployment rates.
  • Commander of Awesome
    Wasn't that dumb, he could have looked it up, sure. But ppl have gotten excel help here before. I actually never had to do that before, so I learned something today.

  • Devils Advocate
    Heretic;1576318 wrote:Well, now that CC's been neg'd to oblivion, we have a new candidate with Mr. Make Stupid-Ass Politard Comments in Non-Political Forums.
    If this is a trend, Belly will be red by Friday.
  • dlazz
    Commander of Awesome;1576358 wrote:Wasn't that dumb
    It's a very common excel function, ERGO...
    Commander of Awesome;1576358 wrote:he could have looked it up
  • Commander of Awesome
    dlazz;1576377 wrote:It's a very common excel function, ERGO...
    You mean like how you could have googled what recently disco'd food people missed but instead decided to make a thread asking about it?

  • dlazz
    Commander of Awesome;1576395 wrote:You mean like how you could have googled what recently disco'd food people missed but instead decided to make a thread asking about it?
    My thread was to generate discussion. His was asking an easily answered question that warranted a single response and nothing further.

    Hope this helps.
  • Commander of Awesome
    dlazz;1576396 wrote:My thread was to generate discussion. His was asking an easily answered question that warranted a single response and nothing further.

    Hope this helps.
    ETB's thread: 18 replies

    dlazz's thread: 4 replies

    Sooooo.................... yeah.
  • dlazz
    Commander of Awesome;1576405 wrote:ETB's thread: 18 replies

    dlazz's thread: 4 replies

    Sooooo.................... yeah.
    His post: (1) post asking question, (2) you answering his stupid question, (3-21) irrelevant posts.

    Sooooo.................... yeah.
  • Commander of Awesome
    dlazz;1576419 wrote:His post: (1) post asking question, (2) you answering his stupid question, (3-21) irrelevant posts.

    Sooooo.................... yeah.
    Interesting opinion, too bad it's irrelevant. Hope this helps.