Is UCLA Wrong?
-
Classyposter58
They are wrong and the entire Black community needs to focus on GRADUATING kids. Honestly at school I have quite a few blacks in my 1000, a few in my 2000 classes, and literally none in my 3000 ones. That's right I've got two 3000 ones this semester with maybe 30 kids a piece, and no blacks. They simply are dropping out much too soon which does not progress them in society at all -
steubbigred
LA has a black school it's called USC.like_that;1533673 wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/08/ucla-black-enrollment-freshmen_n_4242213.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false
Cliff notes: Black students complaining that there are not enough black students enrolled at UCLA.
UCLA is an Asian college because they are just smater people in general. USC has basket weaving . that should suffice. -
#1DBag
University of Spoiled Children is in South LA. The USC alums live in West LA, next to UCLA. -
Mohican00
If it's that simple to break the cycle of poverty, why aren't more people doing it? To stay on subject, sure the federal government would spend more on shit school districts, it's not like the local property tax in East Cleveland is going to be of much help.ccrunner609;1533956 wrote:Counterpoint, they sleep in the beds they make. Change your community, change your family dynamics, quit accepting that things are they way they are cause the man is keeping you down.
The Federal state government spend 800% more money on the lower or so called failing school districts. They have no excuses. -
Classyposter58
I think the states need to spread the wealth around as far as public education goes. For instance my old high school spends only $7k per student while a school like Westerville spends over $12k on each student. I'm not a liberal by any stretch but shouldn't a national program based on properly educating all children be a little more liberal in how the money is distributed? We cannot have inner city schools with books from the 90s and pay for play programs, same for some of these small farm town schools as well. If we set a cap if you will so the minimum a district can spend is $8500 and a max of $10500 with anyone over going to the poorer districts, we would see education improve dramatically. Wealthy schools do not need that much of an advantage, it's not private educationccrunner609;1533956 wrote:Counterpoint, they sleep in the beds they make. Change your community, change your family dynamics, quit accepting that things are they way they are cause the man is keeping you down.
The Federal state government spend 800% more money on the lower or so called failing school districts. They have no excuses. -
Manhattan Buckeye
It depends on the area and school district, and how they budget the income. And how they deal with internal corruption.Mohican00;1533971 wrote:If it's that simple to break the cycle of poverty, why aren't more people doing it? To stay on subject, sure the federal government would spend more on shit school districts, it's not like the local property tax in East Cleveland is going to be of much help. -
steubbigredhttp://youtu.be/3ZaPVrTSnyQ
Here you go UCLA my new favorite team!! go Bruins!!
http://youtu.be/DImNRykGCG4 -
Classyposter58
Yeah I mean education isn't a business, it's teaching children. So I have no problem with them socializing it. IMO we also need a federal gov't evaluator of schools, that way we do not have states like Ohio saying 70% of their schools are excellentccrunner609;1533976 wrote:Whats crazy about funding is that a school like Oakwood gets just as much if not more funding then other districts. Their per capita income is something like 4X the national average.
I somewhat agree that pooling state and local funds to evenly distribute $ for schools would likely work. -
WebFire
Because it's not actually simple. It's easier to live off the government tit.Mohican00;1533971 wrote:If it's that simple to break the cycle of poverty, why aren't more people doing it? -
Glory Days
Here in LA, the schools started giving iPads to all the students in order to keep up with the private schools.....I compare that with giving a few dollars to a homeless guy and expecting him to use it to buy food and not alcohol. it was only a matter of days before the kids hacked them or were losing(probably selling them).Classyposter58;1533973 wrote:I think the states need to spread the wealth around as far as public education goes. For instance my old high school spends only $7k per student while a school like Westerville spends over $12k on each student. I'm not a liberal by any stretch but shouldn't a national program based on properly educating all children be a little more liberal in how the money is distributed? We cannot have inner city schools with books from the 90s and pay for play programs, same for some of these small farm town schools as well. If we set a cap if you will so the minimum a district can spend is $8500 and a max of $10500 with anyone over going to the poorer districts, we would see education improve dramatically. Wealthy schools do not need that much of an advantage, it's not private education -
dlazz
More money spent per student does not equal better studentsClassyposter58;1533973 wrote:I think the states need to spread the wealth around as far as public education goes. For instance my old high school spends only $7k per student while a school like Westerville spends over $12k on each student.
Examples:
1. Dayton Northridge: $12,433 per student. Northridge passed 8/24 of the indicators on their ODE report card.
2. Preble Shawnee: $9,938 per student. Preble Shawnee passed 21/24 of the indicators on their ODE report card.
3. Bellbrook: $9,670 per student. Bellbrook passed 24/24 of the indicators on their ODE report card.
My former school district ranked 27th most "poor" ($8,024 per student) and still managed to pass 22/24 of their indicators. -
ernest_t_bass
Lol. Jim Klass wasn't included on any of those tests.ccrunner609;1534016 wrote:your former district was the #1 school in the state when comparing amount of $ spent per student and test scores. -
steubbigred
West LA is where the gays stay.#1DBag;1533969 wrote:University of Spoiled Children is in South LA. The USC alums live in West LA, next to UCLA. -
#1DBag
Gays in LA have money.
-
steubbigred
-
dlazz
wutsteubbigred;1534305 wrote:Here is some very education footage. -
Heretic
You know you want to get your fix of very education footage.dlazz;1534310 wrote:wut -
rmolin73
This 100 fold. We run a tutoring program in the inner city you would be astonished how many kids that can't do basic math, count money, etc. We even serve a meal for the kids because most wouldn't have dinner when they got home. But the are fitted in Polo and Jordans.ccrunner609;1533956 wrote:Counterpoint, they sleep in the beds they make. Change your community, change your family dynamics, quit accepting that things are they way they are cause the man is keeping you down.
The Federal state government spend 800% more money on the lower or so called failing school districts. They have no excuses. -
Tiernan
Well then you've never been in the drunk tank at 3am on a Sat night.SportsAndLady;1533703 wrote:
Never in my entire life have I ever felt discomfort being around blacks, asians, whatever's. -
Heretic
Guess I hadn't noticed you around here for a couple days. Good to see you got back from that in one piece!Tiernan;1534493 wrote:Well then you've never been in the drunk tank at 3am on a Sat night.