Teen Mom in Porn
-
Fred Garvin
Reps to the first person to post a link to that one!GoChiefs;1439054 wrote:Was you expecting her to swing from a ceiling fan with a beer bottle in her butt or something? -
Iliketurtles
Agreed haha... I also thought the Time screensaver on the TV was pretty funny.LJ;1439091 wrote:God those boobs are awful -
LJ
cause it's a nooner duhIliketurtles;1439107 wrote:Agreed haha... I also thought the Time screensaver on the TV was pretty funny. -
like_thatLink? Or is classyposters link it?
-
wildcats20like_that;1439162 wrote:Link? It is clasyposters link it?
Yes -
bases_loadedHer tits look much better in a swim suit.
-
Trueblue23Terrible and not surprising that she goes ATM lol
-
Fab4RunnerNot impressed with her faces. Was really hoping for some super ugly ones. I lol'd at the parts where she was just staring into the camera. Made me laugh for some reason.
-
Laley23
Apparently there is more "leaked" video from Vivid of her squirting and sticking a dildo up her own ass in a limo...lolFab4Runner;1440597 wrote:Not impressed with her faces. Was really hoping for some super ugly ones. I lol'd at the parts where she was just staring into the camera. Made me laugh for some reason. -
Fab4Runner
There was some squirting in the version I watched. No dildo or limo, though, haha.Laley23;1440607 wrote:Apparently there is more "leaked" video from Vivid of her squirting and sticking a dildo up her own ass in a limo...lol
All in all...meh. She is a fucking moron, but her body looks phenom (minus the fake rack, of course)...so there's that. -
gerb131better than most like kim k or paris
-
Laley23Has anyone seen the whole thing? Ive only seen clips.
I gotta imagine it is way better than Paris or Kim K. Those were just terrible. -
Gblockthe full version was on youtube yesterday
-
bases_loaded
did youtube change their policies?Gblock;1440688 wrote:the full version was on youtube yesterday -
Gblock
dunno it was the first vid that came up on a google search..im assuming the only way youtube can ban for explicit content is for a vid to get reported..it only had 153 views so my guess is it wasnt up very long. but it wasnt blurred or anything. that bieng said i was unimpressed. i would rank the paris vid first, then kimk, and this lastbases_loaded;1440689 wrote:did youtube change their policies? -
Fab4Runner
I saw a 42 minute long version. There was clearly more footage that they had cut out, but I think it was the one that was officially released.Laley23;1440632 wrote:Has anyone seen the whole thing? Ive only seen clips.
I gotta imagine it is way better than Paris or Kim K. Those were just terrible.
I have only seen clips of the Paris and Kim K tapes, but I think it's unfair to compare them. They were actual sex tapes, whereas this was a porno. Farrah hired these people to make the movie and was intent on selling it the entire time. If she knew that millions were going to watch, I am sure that changed the quality of her performance. -
FatHobbit
I am unconvinced that Paris and Kim K didn't intend to release their's all along.Fab4Runner;1440701 wrote:I saw a 42 minute long version. There was clearly more footage that they had cut out, but I think it was the one that was officially released.
I have only seen clips of the Paris and Kim K tapes, but I think it's unfair to compare them. They were actual sex tapes, whereas this was a porno. Farrah hired these people to make the movie and was intent on selling it the entire time. If she knew that millions were going to watch, I am sure that changed the quality of her performance. -
sherm03
Agreed. While they weren't fucking a porn star in their sex tapes, I believe that they did it with the sole purpose of intentionally leaking it.FatHobbit;1440719 wrote:I am unconvinced that Paris and Kim K didn't intend to release their's all along. -
Fab4Runner
I know very little about their respective tapes. It wouldn't surprise me, either, but I have no idea if that's actually true.sherm03;1440747 wrote:Agreed. While they weren't fucking a porn star in their sex tapes, I believe that they did it with the sole purpose of intentionally leaking it.
What I do know is that Farrah hired a porn star and a crew to make this video with the intention of selling it. Even if Paris and Kim were going to leak theirs, I still think they are simply sex tapes. It was them and one other person (their actual boyfriends at the time) having sex. Not a porn star and a crew on a set making a movie. -
sherm03
That's a valid point...and very true.Fab4Runner;1440750 wrote:I know very little about their respective tapes. It wouldn't surprise me, either, but I have no idea if that's actually true.
What I do know is that Farrah hired a porn star and a crew to make this video with the intention of selling it. Even if Paris and Kim were going to leak theirs, I still think they are simply sex tapes. It was them and one other person (their actual boyfriends at the time) having sex. Not a porn star and a crew on a set making a movie. -
dlazzFab4Runner watched 42 minutes of porn? :thumbup:
-
Tigerfan00
Another bad day for dlazz as he only made it 42 seconds.dlazz;1440907 wrote:Fab4Runner watched 42 minutes of porn? :thumbup: -
dlazz
42 seconds is a good day for meTigerfan00;1440998 wrote:Another bad day for dlazz as he only made it 42 seconds. -
SportsAndLady
Real knee slapper thereTigerfan00;1440998 wrote:Another bad day for dlazz as he only made it 42 seconds. -
Curly J
The only question here is if YOU would do the same thing to give the OC some cred ???Fab4Runner;1440750 wrote:I know very little about their respective tapes. It wouldn't surprise me, either, but I have no idea if that's actually true.
What I do know is that Farrah hired a porn star and a crew to make this video with the intention of selling it. Even if Paris and Kim were going to leak theirs, I still think they are simply sex tapes. It was them and one other person (their actual boyfriends at the time) having sex. Not a porn star and a crew on a set making a movie.