Movie 43

• ou1980

  Is being reviewed by critics as the worst movie of all time...
  
  "The "Citizen Kane" of awful movies"
  
  -Richard Roeper
  
  "If you mashed-up the worst parts of the infamous Howard the Duck, Gigli, Ishtar and every other awful movie I've seen since I started reviewing professionally in 1981, it wouldn't begin to approach the sheer soul-sucking badness of [Movie 43]."
  
  -New York Post
• jordo212000

  

  Yeah I mean the preview itself looked horrible. Not surprised it is getting panned.
• dlazz

  Movies like these are a quick-buck for producers. The cost to produce is fairly low, and they almost always recoup their investment + a few million.
• ou1980

  Budget was only $5 million, and started shooting in March 2010???
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Synopsis?
• ernest_t_bass

  

  ccrunner609;1376537 wrote:these movies prey on the lowest common denominator of our society......stupid teens. They will make millions

  
  Teens and Jim teechers
• gorocks99

  

  My big question is, how the hell did they get this cast??
  
  Kate Winslet
  Hugh Jackman
  Naomi Watts
  Emma Stone
  Jason Sudeikis
  Justin Long
  Uma Thurman
  Halle Barry
  Gerard Butler
  Richard Gere
  Terrence Howard
  
  I mean, everyone must be in on the joke, right??
• wes_mantooth

  

  gorocks99;1376684 wrote:My big question is, how the hell did they get this cast??
  
  Kate Winslet
  Hugh Jackman
  Naomi Watts
  Emma Stone
  Jason Sudeikis
  Justin Long
  Uma Thurman
  Halle Barry
  Gerard Butler
  Richard Gere
  Terrence Howard
  
  I mean, everyone must be in on the joke, right??

  Just a huge money grab for everyone.
• Sonofanump

  I'll wait for MartyIrish's review before I make my decision.
• Rotinaj

  

  gorocks99;1376684 wrote:My big question is, how the hell did they get this cast??
  
  Kate Winslet
  Hugh Jackman
  Naomi Watts
  Emma Stone
  Jason Sudeikis
  Justin Long
  Uma Thurman
  Halle Barry
  Gerard Butler
  Richard Gere
  Terrence Howard
  
  I mean, everyone must be in on the joke, right??

  Reminds me of the cast of Mars Attacks. Even though I thought that movie was a funny horrible.
• gorocks99

  

  Rotinaj;1376727 wrote:Reminds me of the cast of Mars Attacks. Even though I thought that movie was a funny horrible.

  Mars Attacks! is awesome. You don't speak ill of that masterpiece.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Mars attacks! was so awesome
• FatHobbit

  

  wes_mantooth;1376686 wrote:Just a huge money grab for everyone.

  How is it a money grab for everyone if their budget was only $5 million? (I honestly have no idea how they were able to get that cast.)
• BORIStheCrusher

  

  I'm actually slightly interested in seeing this. It has a great cast, and the unedited trailer is much better than the tv preview.
  
  NSFW
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VneW1vtcWY
• ou1980

  Read about the production of movie 43...the film is only comprised of 11 different very raunchy skits. They would sometimes go 3-6 months between shooting each skit, hence the 3 year shoot, and used 11 different directors for the film. Wikipedias page for the movie describes each of the 11 scenes in detail, and it's disgusting.
• wes_mantooth

  

  FatHobbit;1376742 wrote:How is it a money grab for everyone if their budget was only $5 million? (I honestly have no idea how they were able to get that cast.)

  I am sure they get % of the profits...and they probably each had a day or two on set.
• FatHobbit

  

  wes_mantooth;1376752 wrote:I am sure they get % of the profits...and they probably each had a day or two on set.

  That makes sense. Thanks
• TedSheckler

  

  ernest_t_bass;1376532 wrote:Synopsis?

  It's about people who are too lazy to Google.