Archive

The no sexual content rule...

  • Pick6
    BORIStheCrusher;1288382 wrote:
    OC spank-bank material.
  • reclegend22
    justincredible;1287981 wrote:lol, you're right. This entire site was built on sex. Give me a break.
    Lol. I generally don't take part in these threads, but oh-my-god-what-is-wrong-with-people.

    If you can't participate in casual conversation here without your reproductive organs peer pressuring you into posting a picture of breasts or immediately seeking out breasts anywhere you can find them, then you need to a shit ton of zoloft. Good lord.
  • Fly4Fun
    Pick6;1288387 wrote:OC spank-bank material.
    I might have to delete that picture... The second girl from the right is exposing way too much neck.
  • BORIStheCrusher
    reclegend22;1288398 wrote:Lol. I generally don't take part in these threads, but oh-my-god-what-is-wrong-with-people.

    If you can't participate in casual conversation here without your reproductive organs peer pressuring you into posting a picture of breasts or immediately seeking out breasts anywhere you can find them, then you need to a shit ton of zoloft. Good lord.
    Not that it's a big deal to me since I don't post pics of hot girls often (except the one in this thread), but this is a site completely full of guys. And hot girls happens to be a popular topic among a lot of men.
  • reclegend22
    BORIStheCrusher;1288407 wrote:Not that it's a big deal to me since I don't post pics of hot girls often (except the one in this thread), but this is a site completely full of guys. And hot girls happens to be a popular topic among a lot of men.
    That is true. But, I look at this site for what it ultimately derived from, and that's a forum for talking about sports and trivia. I don't know that half-naked women is what drove J.J. to become so popular to begin with. I thought that was what por* and bigbustybabes dot com is for. Although, to be fair, I do remember there being thread on J.J. dedicated entirely to hot women and pictures of them. So, I wonder how the old site circumvented that issue, since J.J. has always featured ads to a certain extent. I am assuming they are operating under a different provider of some sort. I don't know.
  • j_crazy
    Pick6;1288387 wrote:OC spank-bank material.

    Reps. Im on a phone, so not real reps.
  • WebFire
    reclegend22;1288398 wrote:Lol. I generally don't take part in these threads, but oh-my-god-what-is-wrong-with-people.

    If you can't participate in casual conversation here without your reproductive organs peer pressuring you into posting a picture of breasts or immediately seeking out breasts anywhere you can find them, then you need to a shit ton of zoloft. Good lord.
    C'mon man! AdSense! Quit talking about breasts.
  • reclegend22
    WebFire;1288431 wrote:C'mon man! AdSense! Quit talking about breasts.
    Lol. Well played.
  • Bigdogg
    reclegend22;1288398 wrote:Lol. I generally don't take part in these threads, but oh-my-god-what-is-wrong-with-people.

    If you can't participate in casual conversation here without your reproductive organs peer pressuring you into posting a picture of breasts or immediately seeking out breasts anywhere you can find them, then you need to a shit ton of zoloft. Good lord.
    The problem is there are plenty of places where you can participate in casual conversations. Very few where you can get in the gutter.
  • Bigdogg
    Steel Valley Football;1288377 wrote:Nothing is frea these days.
    Because it hard to type on a droid idiot.
  • Bigdogg
    Because it hard to type on a droid idiot. FU Just. You are another reason this place sucks.
  • Bigdogg
    Manhattan Buckeye;1288378 wrote:It left with the peach. I'm hardly one to be a grammar Nazi but my god, how does anyone misspell speech? It is the same letter.
    Because it hard to type on a droid idiot. FU Just. You are another reason this place sucks.
  • Rotinaj
    j_crazy;1288413 wrote:Reps. Im on a phone, so not real reps.
    I can give real reps from my phone.
    Hope this helps.
  • Rotinaj
    Bigdogg;1288464 wrote:Because it hard to type on a droid idiot. FU Just. You are another reason this place sucks.
    Cool story bro. Just kidding, stop crying and go find yourself.
  • reclegend22
    Bigdogg;1288459 wrote:The problem is there are plenty of places where you can participate in casual conversations. Very view where you can get in the gutter.
    Do you really have that wild a desire to "get in the gutter"? Lol. Not judging. I get where you are coming from and what you are saying. I guess I just am happy to come here and get my sports and trivia fix. Everyone is different.
  • Steel Valley Football
    Bigdogg;1288464 wrote:Because it hard to type on a droid idiot. FU Just. You are another reason this place sucks.
    Reps. Don't ever lose that chip brother.
  • Bigdogg
    Rotinaj;1288472 wrote:Cool story bro. Just kidding, stop crying and go find yourself.
    Who is crying? Just telling it like it is. You mad bro?;) or do you and just have a "thing" going? Why do you feel like I would care?
  • ernest_t_bass
  • BORIStheCrusher
    That might be too sexual for some people here.
  • GoChiefs
    Bigdogg;1288464 wrote:Because it hard to type on a droid idiot. FU Just. You are another reason this place sucks.

    Speech

    *Sent from Motorola Droid*
  • Trueblue23
    @Justin maybe it's a stupid question, but why does Adsense care about what is posted? I mean, you'd think they'd want more page views, regardless of content. I assume it's a "We don't want to be associated with that kind of material" deal, which is ridiculous because the average computer user doesn't care about ads or what type of material they are or are not associated with.

    Is disabling images the next logical step to prevent these issues?
  • j_crazy
    Rotinaj;1288471 wrote:I can give real reps from my phone.
    Hope this helps.

    How?
  • justincredible
    Trueblue23;1288542 wrote:@Justin maybe it's a stupid question, but why does Adsense care about what is posted? I mean, you'd think they'd want more page views, regardless of content. I assume it's a "We don't want to be associated with that kind of material" deal, which is ridiculous because the average computer user doesn't care about ads or what type of material they are or are not associated with.

    Is disabling images the next logical step to prevent these issues?
    It's apparently because the people that advertise through them don't want to be associated with adult content or something. I dunno, like I said they don't give you many (any?) details at all.

    This conversation is also getting nowhere. Like I said, we're not going to be nazi's and go around infracting people but if something might be close to the imaginary line that google has made extremely vague we might delete a post. I honestly don't understand why this is such a huge deal to some people.
  • justincredible
    Bigdogg;1288464 wrote:Because it hard to type on a droid idiot. FU Just. You are another reason this place sucks.
    [video=youtube;sfvoFa4phO4][/video]
  • justincredible
    Here is a nice little quote I found from someone on the adsense policy team that shows just how vague they like to be:
    If you wouldn’t want a child to see the content or if you would be embarrassed to view the page in front of colleagues, then it’s probably not family-safe and you shouldn’t place AdSense ad code on it.
    Basically, it's a judgement call ON THEIR END. They can pull AdSense from us based on one employees judgement.