What's the Most Disgusting Beer?

• ernest_t_bass

  

  Many of you will say Keystone, just because. But what's the grossest?
  
  Steel Reserve
• gorocks99

  

  Not sure if it's available in Ohio, but the only beer I've ever poured out is Olympia Ice.
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Beer 30 is quite terrible.
• like_that

  

  ernest_t_bass;1262428 wrote:Beer 30 is quite terrible.

  This.
  
  Pretty much the worst beer I have ever had. Good hazing beer, smh. Miller highlife isn't far behind imo.
• O-Trap

  

  Steel Reserve ... isn't that malt liquor? That doesn't really count.
  
  Worst I've ever had was Natty Light. Busch was pretty bad. Keyston Dry tastes like I imagine cat vomit would taste like.
• wildcats20

  

  O-Trap;1262469 wrote:Steel Reserve ... isn't that malt liquor? That doesn't really count.
  
  Worst I've ever had was Natty Light. Busch was pretty bad. Keyston Dry tastes like I imagine cat vomit would taste like.

  
  Honestly I don't mind Natty. It's definitely not good, but there are worse. Busch and Busch Light for sure are worse IMO.
• gorocks99

  

  Milwaukee's Best Special Reserve Ice... had that in college. Never. Again.
  
  
• Enforcer

  

  Ive only tried beer once, So I'll go with that, Busch Lite
• O-Trap

  

  Enforcer;1262527 wrote:Ive only tried beer once, So I'll go with that, Busch Lite

  Then you've not tried beer yet.
• Enforcer

  

  O-Trap;1262534 wrote:Then you've not tried beer yet.

  
  I was 13 when I tried it , havent had one since , Now 33
• Mulva

  

  Just about any ice beer you could name would be up there. I'll drink a natty light before a natty ice any day. Keystone and Miller are also very bad.
• O-Trap

  

  Truth on the "Ice" thing. Molson Ice is disGUSTing.
• gut

  I actually had a Goose Island Bourbon County Stout (14.5% alcohol!!!!). It sounds delicious, but I could not drink that. It was one sip and I couldn't do it. Even smelled like crap pouring it down the sink.
  http://www.gooseisland.com/pages/bourbon_county_stout/59.php
  
  
  Most of the other names mentioned are just watered down piss. They certainly arent' remotely decent beers, but you can drink one. Although I'd struggle to finish a Natty Ice these days (other than for nostalgia!). And I hate most wheat beers.
• Sonofanump

  Scrambled.
• O-Trap

  

  gut;1262553 wrote:I actually had a Goose Island Bourbon County Stout (14.5% alcohol!!!!). It sounds delicious, but I could not drink that. It was one sip and I couldn't do it. Even smelled like crap pouring it down the sink.
  http://www.gooseisland.com/pages/bourbon_county_stout/59.php

  What was so bad about it? Never had it, but I've heard awesome things about it.
• sleeper

  

  Oh great another thread for beer snobs to tell us about how terrible the beer people drink is and that it's not really beer if its not made by a microbrew in KERBLACKISTAN.
  
  spare me.
• O-Trap

  

  sleeper;1262569 wrote:Oh great another thread for beer snobs to tell us about how terrible the beer people drink is and that it's not really beer if its not made by a microbrew in KERBLACKISTAN.
  
  spare me.

  Thank you for your participation in a thread you don't see any value in participating in. It's no different than you telling someone that your college is better than another.
• gut

  O-Trap;1262568 wrote:What was so bad about it? Never had it, but I've heard awesome things about it.

  Can't really remember. Perhaps a love it or hate it sort of thing. Tasted kind of like a tootsie roll dipped in a honey brown beer with a couple shots of Wild Turkey. It tasted as bad as it smelled.
• O-Trap

  

  gut;1262572 wrote:Can't really remember. Perhaps a love it or hate it sort of thing. Tasted kind of like a tootsie roll dipped in a honey brown beer with a couple shots of Wild Turkey. It tasted as bad as it smelled.

  Sounds a touch sweet for my taste, but other than that, I actually kinda like how it sounds. You might be right, though, that it's a love/hate thing.
  
  Just saw that BA has it at a 97. Now I've GOTTA try it.
• rmolin73

  

  Budweiser
• sleeper

  

  O-Trap;1262571 wrote:Thank you for your participation in a thread you don't see any value in participating in. It's no different than you telling someone that your college is better than another.

  Right because a subjective taste in beer is equivalent to an objective review of one of the most prestigious and academic powerhouses in the country. :rolleyes:
• said_aouita

  

  Looking back most likely it was skunky and not normally so bad tasting. I don't know that for sure so I've not tried it again since.
  
• O-Trap

  

  sleeper;1262592 wrote:Right because a subjective taste in beer is equivalent to an objective review of one of the most prestigious and academic powerhouses in the country. :rolleyes:

  The quality of beer is equally objective ... potentially more so. Beer and the process by which it is made can be explained as objective truths. The differences, then, can also be discussed as a matter of objective fact.
  
  It's a lot like automobiles. The difference between a Rabbit and a 350Li is more than just a matter of subjective taste. The mechanics of the 350Li establish it as a superior vehicle. Now, your preference may be for either one. A person may prefer the Rabbit anyway, and that is his prerogative. However, that doesn't change the fact that the Rabbit is an inferior vehicle.
  
  The same can be said of cigars. Everything from the rolling to the tobacco itself to the soil goes into the quality of a cigar. Can the difference between the Phillies at the gas station and a Padron from Cuba be objectively distinguished? Absolutely. Does that mean a person who likes Phillies is "wrong?" Not at all, but the fact that a person has a different preference doesn't change the objective facts surrounding the quality.
  
  Also, I lol'd at "one of the most prestigious and academic powerhouses in the country" for two reasons.
  
  1) "Academic," though an adjective, is not quantifiable. Thus, something cannot be objectively said to be more or less academic, so your sentence doesn't make sense from an objective standpoint. "Prestigious" works, because something that is "more prestigious" can be said to have "more prestige." Something cannot have, to my knowledge, more "academia" or "academy."
  
  2) Since you forgot the other 'L' in the word "illusion" in your signature, I'm going to guess this prestigious academy of higher education didn't teach spelling, assuming you already knew it, probably.
  
  As for the actual claim of objectivity in establishing your alma mater as a "prestigious academic powerhouse" when compared to the rest of the academic institutions in the entire nation, by what criteria do you arrive at your objective conclusion?
  
  If you were referring to Harvard, Princeton, Yale, MIT, Brown, etc., I might have agreed with you. Alas, you weren't.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Milwaukee's Best Ice
  Beer 30
  Miller Lite
  King Cobra
  Summer Shandy
  
  That's off the top of my head. Give me time, I'll think of more.
• O-Trap

  

  Commander of Awesome;1262598 wrote:Summer Shandy

  KIWF!