Random Movie News

• bigdaddy2003

  

  I saw it in the theater and it wasnt that great. Very overrated flick.
• Scarlet_Buckeye

  

  Manhattan Buckeye;1641716 wrote:Guardians - 10/10. Marvel's best film.

  Guardians was great, but how you can say it was better than The Avengers​ idk.
  

  Automatik;1641717 wrote:I watched Gravity last night.
  
  I must be one of those "must see at the theater" movies because I thought it was shit.

  Gravity​ was awful. However, it was pretty awesome in terms of visual effects, but you kinda needed to see it in 3D and at the theaters. Other than that, it was terrible. Like 2 or 3 out of 10 terrible.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Scarlet_Buckeye;1641775 wrote:Guardians was great, but how you can say it was better than The Avengers​ idk.

  This.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  Because both were good, but one was only great. Enjoyed The Avengers but it is a cheesy Marvel movie. Guardians is the new Star Wars, if rocked.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Eh, there were cheesy moments in Guardians as well.
• Scarlet_Buckeye

  

  This is not for arguing sake... literally just for pure informational purposes...
  
  Guardians Rotten Tomato score = 92% ... 7.7/10
  
  Avengers Rotten Tomato score = 92% ... 8/10
  
  Guardians IMDB = 8.8
  
  Avengers IMDB = 8.2
  
  
  I expect the Guardians IMDB score to drop a little after the 'buzz' of it wears off. Both movies are VERY respectable.
  
  We are literally splitting hairs here... but I do think the edge/nod has to go to The Avengers, especially when you stop and consider it was the first to do what it did.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  I think we can all agree Guardians belongs in the same category as Avengers. My dad and I are constantly discussing the hierarchy of Marvel movies and Avengers has been at the top since it came out. It just had A LOT going for it. I won't be shocked if the sequels to both movies are in the same category.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  Snowpiercer = 5/10, hard to review. It has that Asian "ambiguous ending" vibe and you have to check your brain in to watch it because there is no sense of reality. But Chris Evans was good and I'm glad we watched it. Wouldn't watch it again.
• ohiobucks1

  

  Lucy = 6.5 /10. Entertaining but sorta totally weird.
  
  Seeing LAND HO!, THE NOVEMBER MAN, AS ABOVE, SO BELOW this month. Will let you know how they are.
• thavoice

  TMNT was Ok I guess. Maybe a 5 or 5.5. Fox kept it a little interesting.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Lucy is ok, nothing special. I've decided to skip Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Does Scarlett Jo get nekked in Lucy?
• bigdaddy2003

  

  SportsAndLady;1644289 wrote:Does Scarlett Jo get nekked in Lucy?

  Lol no, that would have helped the movie though.
• Scarlet_Buckeye

  

  I know I'm late to the party on this one... but I caught Dawn of Planet of the Apes last night. I thought it was awesome... like 4.5 to 5 stars out of 5 awesome. The guy who voiced Caesar and the other guy who voiced Koba were amazing, especially Caesar. The CGI was really good... could barely tell. Yeah there were a few corny/cheesy moments in the film, but overall... I thought it was a very good film.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  The guy who does Caesar is Andy Serkis. He does Gollum in the Lord of the Rings/Hobbit films.
  
  I may go see Expendables 3 today.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Into the Storm was bad, and I mean like 2 steps up from a Sy Fy channel movie.
• thavoice

  Saw Joe over the weekend with Nicholas Cage.
  
  I would recommend it to my enemies.....movie sucked.
• gut

  thavoice;1645252 wrote:Saw Joe over the weekend with Nicholas Cage.
  
  I would recommend it to my enemies.....movie sucked.

  You were expecting a movie with Nicholas Cage to be good???
• thavoice

  gut;1645256 wrote:You were expecting a movie with Nicholas Cage to be good???

  Well there was that one movie he was in that was good, right?
• TedSheckler

  

  thavoice;1645258 wrote:Well there was that one movie he was in that was good, right?

  Face Off, right? That was his greatest cinematographic performance. Movie was superb, also.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Raising Arizona
• Heretic

  

  TedSheckler;1645261 wrote:Face Off, right? That was his greatest cinematographic performance. Movie was superb, also.

  And at least back in that era, his movies like The Rock and Con Air were consistently entertaining (if mainly in the "turn brain off, sit down and watch the pretty explosions act as a substitute for actual plot" sort of way).
  
  And then he entered the "No project is too stupid or bad for me to take!" mode which he has never left.
• thavoice

  Heretic;1645264 wrote:And at least back in that era, his movies like The Rock and Con Air were consistently entertaining (if mainly in the "turn brain off, sit down and watch the pretty explosions act as a substitute for actual plot" sort of way).
  
  And then he entered the "No project is too stupid or bad for me to take!" mode which he has never left.

  Con air was one of those movies that the first time you watched you though it was pretty solid, but a few years later....not so much.
• Laley23

  

  Con Air is awesome. But, Nick Cage is not the reason...but he at least didnt ruin it.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  I guess Sin City 2 opened the weekend in 6th place. That seems crazy to me.