RR should be let go next saturday!!!

• bigkahuna

  IF we had a pass defense we would be A OK. The reason we lost this game is because Wisky was able to pass, wich softened our run D which allowed them to run easier. If we get these DB recruits that some are speaking of, then we SHOULD improve.
• OldDanTucker

  The guys are there already, the pass d wouldn't be as terrible as it has been if Vlad,turner, and floyd could have played all year. Vlad had a injury to his hammy in the spring, turner had to be redshirted (didn't come on campus till like a week before opening day) and floyd has been battling the flu all year. Woolfolk is way overrated imo yea hes fast but he looks like another morgan trent out there. So that leaves us with 1 quality db this season. Next year the secondary will be fine
• bo shemmy3337

  Tinkertrain wrote: Schemmy
  
  You are an idiot and that's all their is too it! 15 guy's to come in and help right away? There isnt a recruiting class in the country that can give you 15 guy's that as true freshman can come in and contribute. I also see you are one of those star junkies who values a player by his star ranking rather than his long term potential.

  
  
  I never said 15 guys that have to play from day one. Just that I feel they need to have 15 commitments of the 25 on the defensive side of the ball.
  
  
  Look everyone this is Michigan, going 3-9 and 5-7 should not be OK EVER! We can agree to disagree and that's fine but I am looking at it at this standpoint. Michigan wont win more than 8 games next year IMO. I hope they do. But if they don't than RR will be let go so I want him gone now so we don't have to waist a year. I am not on here to make people hate me or anything like that. I was respected on JJ and I will earn it here as well. I was clearly frustrated with the loss today but a lof of you buckeye fans need to realize that Michigan is flat out horrible and if OSU was this bad you would be complaining too.
• bigkahuna

  You're right it's not okay.
  
  But, you can RR now then we have to go through the "growing pains" again, so it's what 3-4 years until some new guy can clean house? Look at the NFL (Different I know) Washington has had 4-5 coaches in the last 10 years; nobody can get anything established. This is the same problem that ND and other schools have...If you dont get immediate results duces. That doesn't work; you need to have some foundation. When you can't build on that foundation is when you need to worry and get canned.
• OldDanTucker

  bo shemmy3337 wrote:

  Tinkertrain wrote: Schemmy
  
  You are an idiot and that's all their is too it! 15 guy's to come in and help right away? There isnt a recruiting class in the country that can give you 15 guy's that as true freshman can come in and contribute. I also see you are one of those star junkies who values a player by his star ranking rather than his long term potential.

  
  
  I never said 15 guys that have to play from day one. Just that I feel they need to have 15 commitments of the 25 on the defensive side of the ball.
  
  
  Look everyone this is Michigan, going 3-9 and 5-7 should not be OK EVER! We can agree to disagree and that's fine but I am looking at it at this standpoint. Michigan wont win more than 8 games next year IMO. I hope they do. But if they don't than RR will be let go so I want him gone now so we don't have to waist a year. I am not on here to make people hate me or anything like that. I was respected on JJ and I will earn it here as well. I was clearly frustrated with the loss today but a lof of you buckeye fans need to realize that Michigan is flat out horrible and if OSU was this bad you would be complaining too.

  I agree with you 100% and its not ok to go 3-9 or 5-7. Think about it like this what is going on at michigan is a COMPLETE change in culture (for the better imo) old michigan was great before carr. Carr was a good not great coach he would consistently have good years but he was slowly running this program in the ground. Turning this program around to be like florida, osu, usc, etc. was not going to be easy and we knew that. Its just showing now that its going to take longer then expected. Im telling you as long as we keep rich rod we will at the top of the big10 like the old days, all the guy has done is win every where he goes. So why wouldn't it work at michigan? With robinson controlling the D we will have a damn good d (people just judge him b/c the syracuse situation and forget what he did as a d-cord) and rich rod controlling the O thats 2 of the best in the buisness for their sides of the ball
• Mr Pat

  bo shemmy3337 wrote: This guy is a moron and we can not let Michigan football turn into Notre Damn.

  Notre "Damn" is in better shape than Michigan. You don't want Michigan to be better than they are now?
• osu99

  haha @ the guy touting his post count over bo schemmy's. not sure about RR, but things don't look good.
• bo shemmy3337

  OldDanTucker wrote:

  bo shemmy3337 wrote:

  Tinkertrain wrote: Schemmy
  
  You are an idiot and that's all their is too it! 15 guy's to come in and help right away? There isnt a recruiting class in the country that can give you 15 guy's that as true freshman can come in and contribute. I also see you are one of those star junkies who values a player by his star ranking rather than his long term potential.

  
  
  I never said 15 guys that have to play from day one. Just that I feel they need to have 15 commitments of the 25 on the defensive side of the ball.
  
  
  Look everyone this is Michigan, going 3-9 and 5-7 should not be OK EVER! We can agree to disagree and that's fine but I am looking at it at this standpoint. Michigan wont win more than 8 games next year IMO. I hope they do. But if they don't than RR will be let go so I want him gone now so we don't have to waist a year. I am not on here to make people hate me or anything like that. I was respected on JJ and I will earn it here as well. I was clearly frustrated with the loss today but a lof of you buckeye fans need to realize that Michigan is flat out horrible and if OSU was this bad you would be complaining too.

  I agree with you 100% and its not ok to go 3-9 or 5-7. Think about it like this what is going on at michigan is a COMPLETE change in culture (for the better imo) old michigan was great before carr. Carr was a good not great coach he would consistently have good years but he was slowly running this program in the ground. Turning this program around to be like florida, osu, usc, etc. was not going to be easy and we knew that. Its just showing now that its going to take longer then expected. Im telling you as long as we keep rich rod we will at the top of the big10 like the old days, all the guy has done is win every where he goes. So why wouldn't it work at michigan? With robinson controlling the D we will have a damn good d (people just judge him b/c the syracuse situation and forget what he did as a d-cord) and rich rod controlling the O thats 2 of the best in the buisness for their sides of the ball

  
  
  
  
  RR needs 2 more year IMO and I just don't see him getting an extension if they only win 8 games next year so I say let him go now to save another year. Also most coaches don't have a system that is there way or the high way. Most coaches adapt to what they have and implement there system while winning the easy games. I understand that they will be great if he gets 4 to 5 years but I don't see him getting past 3 so I want him gone now. I will root for UM forever and will support whomever the coach is. I would rather them give him the extension at the end of this year or fire him. Not knowing for sure what is going to happen only hurts recruiting IMO.
  Michigan needs to either make the commitment for 4 or 5 years or let him go IMO.
• CincyRedRider

  Bo,
  Who do you see them landing if RR is gone? UM is still 1 of the top 10 jobs in the country and I would believe a lot of big name guys would want that job.
• jordo212000

  

  CincyRedRider wrote: Bo,
  Who do you see them landing if RR is gone? UM is still 1 of the top 10 jobs in the country and I would believe a lot of big name guys would want that job.

  Jim Harbaugh and Les Miles would certainly get interviews, right?
• dave

  Les would be nuts to take the job right now, even though he is a Michigan man. Not sure the alumni would be sold on Harbaugh yet. What he has done at Stanford is pretty amazing though and I'd be all for having him. I have no idea what type of offense he ran at San Diego but the one at Stanford is pretty traditional like what Carr ran. They would probably have a high turnover on the roster again.
• jpake1

  

  Never thought he was a great coach. Just a coach in a weak conference with a neat offense that couldn't get it done when it mattered most. It doesn't help that Mr. Tate "I'm a Heisman type player after 4 games" Forcier showed why he is a freshman. I think it serves most UM fans right. The coaching at that school is on par with their fans knowledge on these forums.
• jpake1

  

  Harbaugh would be a GREAT pick up for them. I thought that before this year. The guy knows how to coach. I'd much rather him stay at Stanford and keep RR up north.
• wc expert

  If I remember correctly, Harbaugh had some very unflattering comments about his alma mater that ticked a lot of UM people off. Miles would be miles ahead of Harbaugh if Mich. is dumb enough to fire RRod.
• OldDanTucker

  bo shemmy3337 wrote:

  OldDanTucker wrote:

  bo shemmy3337 wrote:

  Tinkertrain wrote: Schemmy
  
  You are an idiot and that's all their is too it! 15 guy's to come in and help right away? There isnt a recruiting class in the country that can give you 15 guy's that as true freshman can come in and contribute. I also see you are one of those star junkies who values a player by his star ranking rather than his long term potential.

  
  
  I never said 15 guys that have to play from day one. Just that I feel they need to have 15 commitments of the 25 on the defensive side of the ball.
  
  
  Look everyone this is Michigan, going 3-9 and 5-7 should not be OK EVER! We can agree to disagree and that's fine but I am looking at it at this standpoint. Michigan wont win more than 8 games next year IMO. I hope they do. But if they don't than RR will be let go so I want him gone now so we don't have to waist a year. I am not on here to make people hate me or anything like that. I was respected on JJ and I will earn it here as well. I was clearly frustrated with the loss today but a lof of you buckeye fans need to realize that Michigan is flat out horrible and if OSU was this bad you would be complaining too.

  I agree with you 100% and its not ok to go 3-9 or 5-7. Think about it like this what is going on at michigan is a COMPLETE change in culture (for the better imo) old michigan was great before carr. Carr was a good not great coach he would consistently have good years but he was slowly running this program in the ground. Turning this program around to be like florida, osu, usc, etc. was not going to be easy and we knew that. Its just showing now that its going to take longer then expected. Im telling you as long as we keep rich rod we will at the top of the big10 like the old days, all the guy has done is win every where he goes. So why wouldn't it work at michigan? With robinson controlling the D we will have a damn good d (people just judge him b/c the syracuse situation and forget what he did as a d-cord) and rich rod controlling the O thats 2 of the best in the buisness for their sides of the ball

  
  
  
  
  RR needs 2 more year IMO and I just don't see him getting an extension if they only win 8 games next year so I say let him go now to save another year. Also most coaches don't have a system that is there way or the high way. Most coaches adapt to what they have and implement there system while winning the easy games. I understand that they will be great if he gets 4 to 5 years but I don't see him getting past 3 so I want him gone now. I will root for UM forever and will support whomever the coach is. I would rather them give him the extension at the end of this year or fire him. Not knowing for sure what is going to happen only hurts recruiting IMO.
  Michigan needs to either make the commitment for 4 or 5 years or let him go IMO.

  I disagree, I think as long as he gets 8 wins then he gets a 4th year(but he needs a big win next year to). I think the schedule is set up nicely for us to get at least 8 wins.
  
  Uconn-win
  @nd-toss up(depending on if claussen returns)
  Umass-win
  BG-win
  @indiana-not a easy game for anyone next year but should win
  msu-same as iu
  iowa-toss up
  @psu-should win this imo but you never know
  illinois-win (juice is gone and benn will leave)
  @purdue-win(joey elliot is gone)
  wisconsin-toss
  @O$U- toss but probably a loss (sad to say but they will be loaded next year)
  
  So imo thats 8 teams that I thnk we should win against and 4 toss up games. If we can go 8-4 or 9-3(big win over nd or wisky) then that shows improvement and buys him another year. 2011 is the year that we start getting back on top of the conference and bcs imo. You need to remeber we are a VERY young team and will only get better (cant get any worse). Other then wisconsin, PSU, and Illinois we have been in every game this year.
• TBradyfan

  Ok, I have read enough. Shemmy, you are spot on my friend. 8 wins in two years in incredibly unacceptable at Michigan. This is the all time winningest program in college football history. Since when does Michigan have to "rebuild" or give a coach time to input a system. Lloyd Carr was ran out of town because he "only won" 8-10 games a year (with a few exceptions of course). RR can't win 10 games in two years at UM? I gave the man a chance even though his hiring was questionable. Two years is enough for me.
• Tinkertrain

  An interesting article on the scout board that shed's some light on the michigan defensive problem's and where the root of the problem is. Fella's alot of this problem goes back to Carr and his recruiting on defense which led to 17 out of 28 recruit's being complete bust's in his final 3 year's. Yes you read that right Carr only recruited 28 player's on defense in 3 years.... and we wonder why we have zero depth?
  
  http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=162&f=1088&t=5119012
• OldDanTucker

  TBradyfan wrote: Ok, I have read enough. Shemmy, you are spot on my friend. 8 wins in two years in incredibly unacceptable at Michigan. This is the all time winningest program in college football history. Since when does Michigan have to "rebuild" or give a coach time to input a system. Lloyd Carr was ran out of town because he "only won" 8-10 games a year (with a few exceptions of course). RR can't win 10 games in two years at UM? I gave the man a chance even though his hiring was questionable. Two years is enough for me.

  If they give rich rod at least 4 years to prove what he can do then we will be back on top. Do you think that anyone else could have done any better with these players? Name one guy on O that was worth a damn last year. Don't worry I'll wait! Now with the D this year name one guy that could have won with that D. Once again don't worry I'll wait! Like Tinkertrain said look at what carr left us on D, nothing at all. You cant expect rich rod to have 11 guys on O that are ready to run his system and 11 guys on D that are ready to play in the big10 in only his 2nd year.
• bo shemmy3337

  OldDanTucker wrote:

  TBradyfan wrote: Ok, I have read enough. Shemmy, you are spot on my friend. 8 wins in two years in incredibly unacceptable at Michigan. This is the all time winningest program in college football history. Since when does Michigan have to "rebuild" or give a coach time to input a system. Lloyd Carr was ran out of town because he "only won" 8-10 games a year (with a few exceptions of course). RR can't win 10 games in two years at UM? I gave the man a chance even though his hiring was questionable. Two years is enough for me.

  If they give rich rod at least 4 years to prove what he can do then we will be back on top. Do you think that anyone else could have done any better with these players? Name one guy on O that was worth a damn last year. Don't worry I'll wait! Now with the D this year name one guy that could have won with that D. Once again don't worry I'll wait! Like Tinkertrain said look at what carr left us on D, nothing at all. You cant expect rich rod to have 11 guys on O that are ready to run his system and 11 guys on D that are ready to play in the big10 in only his 2nd year.

  
  
  
  Extending his contract an extra year is not going to help with recruiting. Either fire him or give him an extension IMO. We need solid recruits and not knowing if they will have the same coach for more than a year is not going to help IMO.
• bo shemmy3337

  Look I like RR and I think he can get us where we need to go but Michigan is not going to give him that time IMO. An 8 win season with no wins over OSU is exactly why Carr is gone. If it took us 3 years to get back to where we were before RR was there than that was a mistake IMO.
• dwccrew

  

  bo shemmy3337 wrote: Look I like RR and I think he can get us where we need to go but Michigan is not going to give him that time IMO. An 8 win season with no wins over OSU is exactly why Carr is gone. If it took us 3 years to get back to where we were before RR was there than that was a mistake IMO.

  Yea but Carr stepped down. You have sort of changed your tune on RR, haven't you? You wanted him to be gone, now you are saying you like him but UM won't give him the time? Which is it?
• bo shemmy3337

  dwccrew wrote:

  bo shemmy3337 wrote: Look I like RR and I think he can get us where we need to go but Michigan is not going to give him that time IMO. An 8 win season with no wins over OSU is exactly why Carr is gone. If it took us 3 years to get back to where we were before RR was there than that was a mistake IMO.

  Yea but Carr stepped down. You have sort of changed your tune on RR, haven't you? You wanted him to be gone, now you are saying you like him but UM won't give him the time? Which is it?

  
  
  
  No I don't see him getting his 4th year and one year extensions are not the way to go IMO. Ive said before on jj that I would rather them extend his contract now than wait a year. I would rather him be gone but I am confident the can get UM where they need to be. But I don't think the boosters will support him with no OSU wins. I just do not want to waist another year.
  
  No I don't like him. He has brought bad press to AA and is not winning games. I do think he can do it but he has done nothing yet.
• dwccrew

  

  bo shemmy3337 wrote: Look I like RR and I think he can get us where we need to go but Michigan is not going to give him that time IMO.

  bo shemmy3337 wrote: No I don't like him. He has brought bad press to AA and is not winning games. I do think he can do it but he has done nothing yet.

  Ok, these are what are confusing me. In one instance you say you like him and in the other you say you don't. Not picking on you, just wondering why you like him, then you don't.
  
  I don't think RR is the answer at Michigan. He is a terrible in-game coach and was not Michigan's first choice.
  
  Michigan should go after a Brian Kelly or Jim Harbaugh.
• bo shemmy3337

  dwccrew wrote:

  bo shemmy3337 wrote: Look I like RR and I think he can get us where we need to go but Michigan is not going to give him that time IMO.

  bo shemmy3337 wrote: No I don't like him. He has brought bad press to AA and is not winning games. I do think he can do it but he has done nothing yet.

  Ok, these are what are confusing me. In one instance you say you like him and in the other you say you don't. Not picking on you, just wondering why you like him, then you don't.
  
  I don't think RR is the answer at Michigan. He is a terrible in-game coach and was not Michigan's first choice.
  
  Michigan should go after a Brian Kelly or Jim Harbaugh.

  
  
  
  
  
  I have not been very clear lol.
  
  I do like him as a person and I understand what he is trying to do. But I don't like him as a coach because he has not won anything at UM. I am not a fan of WVU so he has to win games at UM for me to like his coaching.
• dwccrew

  

  ^^^Now I see what you mean.