Archive

Ruffin McNeil, Texas Tech D Coordinator, Fired.

  • Fidmeister
    There's so much shit in here against Justin's rules and half of it is said by a moderator.

    As for the situation, no shock. Why would he keep them, especially Ruffin? He has a right to bring his own guys aboard.
  • LJ
    Fidmeister wrote: There's so much shit in here against Justin's rules and half of it is said by a moderator.

    As for the situation, no shock. Why would he keep them, especially Ruffin? He has a right to bring his own guys aboard.
    Oh noes.... Everything bad I said were actually quotes from another website.
  • FairwoodKing
    I never appreciated JJ's ban on bad language until now.
  • Fidmeister
    But LJ it doesn't really matter. You got just as personal as Olivia Benson's lap dog, whether you were quoting a web site or not.
  • derek bomar
    FairwoodKing wrote: I never appreciated JJ's ban on bad language until now.
    go back?
  • osu99
    wow. all of this over Tommy Tuberville.
  • queencitybuckeye
    FairwoodKing wrote: I never appreciated JJ's ban on bad language until now.
    There are multiple ways to get out of a thread you find offensive.
  • jordo212000
    Give me a break about the foul language. If you went to high school, I'm sure you heard much worse. (This is coming from a guy who doesn't use it)
  • LJ
    Fidmeister wrote: But LJ it doesn't really matter. You got just as personal as Olivia Benson's lap dog, whether you were quoting a web site or not.
    How can I get personal when I didn't type 1 thing that I posted. It was all copy and pasted. I love the high horse logic some people have. What I posted what nothing more than quotes from an "ethug" website as a joke.
  • jordo212000
    LJ wrote: How can I get personal when I didn't type 1 thing that I posted. It was all copy and pasted. I love the high horse logic some people have. What I posted what nothing more than quotes from an "ethug" website as a joke.
    Haha I don't know if I'd use this defense. By that logic I could go to a porno website copy the Image, paste it on a thread and then say "well I didn't take the picture!"
  • LJ
    jordo212000 wrote:
    LJ wrote: How can I get personal when I didn't type 1 thing that I posted. It was all copy and pasted. I love the high horse logic some people have. What I posted what nothing more than quotes from an "ethug" website as a joke.
    Haha I don't know if I'd use this defense. By that logic I could go to a porno website copy the Image, paste it on a thread and then say "well I didn't take the picture!"
    that's a little different. See he is accusing me of personally attacking elliot, which I did not do, I merely quoted things from flame-thrower.net. If he wants to get huffy about the language that's fine and your porn picture example would match that, but to say I got personal without me typing 1 thing that was posted is absolutely absurd.
  • jordo212000
    LJ wrote:
    that's a little different. See he is accusing me of personally attacking elliot, which I did not do, I merely quoted things from flame-thrower.net. If he wants to get huffy about the language that's fine and your porn picture example would match that, but to say I got personal without me typing 1 thing that was posted is absolutely absurd.
    I could see that causing problems for people that were unaware that you were copying and pasting.

    I don't know I just don't like the precedent this sets. Now some douche who wants starts popping off and cussing people out can just say "well I just copied and pasted all of that, it wasn't me"
  • LJ
    jordo212000 wrote:
    LJ wrote:
    that's a little different. See he is accusing me of personally attacking elliot, which I did not do, I merely quoted things from flame-thrower.net. If he wants to get huffy about the language that's fine and your porn picture example would match that, but to say I got personal without me typing 1 thing that was posted is absolutely absurd.
    I could see that causing problems for people that were unaware that you were copying and pasting.

    I don't know I just don't like the precedent this sets. Now some douche who wants starts popping off and cussing people out can just say "well I just copied and pasted all of that, it wasn't me"
    They were in response to his profanity laced threats. If it sets a precedent to respond to threats like that, then so be it.

    I don't know how people could be unaware, since I posted the site and admitted to it multiple times.

    I said if you want to be huffy about the language go for it, but saying I was getting personal is absurd.
  • derek bomar
    I think LJ's fine ...elliot was an obvious troll
  • jordo212000
    LJ wrote: They were in response to his profanity laced threats. If it sets a precedent to respond to threats like that, then so be it.

    I don't know how people could be unaware, since I posted the site and admitted to it multiple times.

    I said if you want to be huffy about the language go for it, but saying I was getting personal is absurd.
    Yeah I have no problem with the language at all. I was kind of referring to the responses in this thread, but I kind of wasn't. My main point is that people can potentially be unaware that somebody is copying and pasting and that the "copying and pasting" can easily be used as a defense too by some idiot poster, and can't realistically be proven or disproven.

    My point was just that in the future I felt that this defense could be taken advantage of
  • ytownfootball
    Hardly anything to worry about. The odds there's anyone as off base as ole elliot are slim, he's just waaaayyyy off base. That type of "precedent" won't be necessary.
  • LJ
    jordo212000 wrote:
    LJ wrote: They were in response to his profanity laced threats. If it sets a precedent to respond to threats like that, then so be it.

    I don't know how people could be unaware, since I posted the site and admitted to it multiple times.

    I said if you want to be huffy about the language go for it, but saying I was getting personal is absurd.
    Yeah I have no problem with the language at all. I was kind of referring to the responses in this thread, but I kind of wasn't. My main point is that people can potentially be unaware that somebody is copying and pasting and that the "copying and pasting" can easily be used as a defense too by some idiot poster, and can't realistically be proven or disproven.

    My point was just that in the future I felt that this defense could be taken advantage of
    If soemone were unaware that I was copying and pasting then they have more problems than I can help them with. I mentioned it multiple times. And it's not a defense, it's the truth. I jokingly responded to his ACTUAL threats.

    get over it.
  • jordo212000
    LJ wrote: If soemone were unaware that I was copying and pasting then they have more problems than I can help them with. I mentioned it multiple times. And it's not a defense, it's the truth. I jokingly responded to his ACTUAL threats.

    get over it.
    haha nevermind dude. Once again, I'll repeat my point really wasn't referencing what you just went through with Stabler, but the big picture. But its cool.
  • ULbuckeye10
    From the looks of it LJ is as off base as Elliot haha. Back to subject, I didn't know Texas Tech even played defense let alone had someone calling defensive plays.
  • ULbuckeye10
    I think I understand why Elliott was so offended by this. Tuberville is white McNeill is black. Look at Elliot's avatar. A white man got the job and fired a black man. THAT RACIST BASTARD! I wonder when Al Sharpton will make Tech fire Tuberville because of this?