In Game Thread- Ohio State vs. Inidiana
-
slingshot4ever
i had a guy texting me about hating on barrett...I love JT, receivers just aren't doing well at getting open. Then there were 4 flat out drops yesterdayAutomatik;1869703 wrote:My friends were whining about Barrett last night, specifically the play when he threw it out of bounds on 3rd down when he was flushed from the pocket.
No one was open, the fuck is he supposed to do? -
Terry_TateBoth of these things can be true - The receivers did not do a good job of getting separation, and also JT Barrett straight up missed some throws.
It seems like the biggest problem is either one or the other happens every play for stretches of several drives. During the Clemson game it was for 4 quarters, and for last night it was the first half. Dixon dropped a first down pass that might have helped get the offense in rhythm at one point, Campbell dropped the deep touchdown pass that was perfectly thrown, as well as another pass that I can remember, but also Barrett had several times where he didn't put the ball where it could be caught. Zone 6 continues to be the most overrated(overhyped?) unit on the team though.
It seems like Barrett needs to get a few carries in and he settles down as a passer for some reason. Maybe it's just finding his element or the defense adjusting for him running, but either way it seemed like things started to click last night when he started keeping the ball more instead of just doing handoffs to Dobbins.
The defense gave up a ton of yards through the air, but Cobbs and their other WR were damn good last night, and also it doesn't help when the offense can't get anything going and Indiana keeps trotting back out there on offense.
Either way, first game of the year on the road in B1G play against what seems like a decent Indiana team, can't ask for perfection. Hopefully the offense won't take a half to get going against Indiana. -
AutomatikAlso the one to Dobbins on the wheel route was right on the money. Defender just played it perfectly.
People just love to complain, it's nothing new. -
Heretic
That's one thing I noticed. Early on, when the offense was at its worst, Barrett wasn't running. When he started running, whether it was forcing the defense to adjust to that or him getting in a groove because he was using all his tools, the offense started clicking. It's something I don't understand about their play-calling, because I've seen it a lot in recent years. You have a mobile quarterback, which means that his legs are a part of his game, but you'll go stretches where you try to make him a pocket passer, which is some square peg, round hole shit.Terry_Tate;1869733 wrote:Both of these things can be true - The receivers did not do a good job of getting separation, and also JT Barrett straight up missed some throws.
It seems like the biggest problem is either one or the other happens every play for stretches of several drives. During the Clemson game it was for 4 quarters, and for last night it was the first half. Dixon dropped a first down pass that might have helped get the offense in rhythm at one point, Campbell dropped the deep touchdown pass that was perfectly thrown, as well as another pass that I can remember, but also Barrett had several times where he didn't put the ball where it could be caught. Zone 6 continues to be the most overrated(overhyped?) unit on the team though.
It seems like Barrett needs to get a few carries in and he settles down as a passer for some reason. Maybe it's just finding his element or the defense adjusting for him running, but either way it seemed like things started to click last night when he started keeping the ball more instead of just doing handoffs to Dobbins.
The defense gave up a ton of yards through the air, but Cobbs and their other WR were damn good last night, and also it doesn't help when the offense can't get anything going and Indiana keeps trotting back out there on offense.
Either way, first game of the year on the road in B1G play against what seems like a decent Indiana team, can't ask for perfection. Hopefully the offense won't take a half to get going against Indiana.
Still, he wound up with a good game that would have been great if those drops were caught. And opening the season with a road game against a decent (if not actually good) league rival isn't the easiest way to start out. Just rebounding from a shaky first half to be dominant in the second is a good sign, as far as I'm concerned. Now they just need to build on that to take on Oklahoma, since they'll need two good halves there. -
vball10set
/threadAutomatik;1869734 wrote:
People just love to complain, it's nothing new. -
ernest_t_bassWould have liked to see Dobbins score. Especially on the first running TD. You could tell he wanted to be out there, but you know he understands. Still would have liked to see him get the TD, for as hard as he worked all night.
-
BRF
InidianaSpock;1869698 wrote:Called that -
supermanListened to Indiana radio after the game. They pointed out that IU returned most of the starters from a top 30 defense.
-
vball10set
lol...well playedBRF;1869745 wrote:Inidiana