Archive

2017 NCAA Player Pick-'Em Discussion Thread

  • Big_Mirg_ZHS
    Bwahahahahahahaha
  • wildcats20
    Thank you Nigel Hayes
  • wildcats20
    Accurate?
    Member Total Rem. Plyrs.
    Big_Mirg_ZHS 344 5
    Wildcats20 287 7
    Terry_Tate 246 4
    sportchampps 233 9
    Gerb131 232 5
    Iliketurtles 227 8
    JSchilling 224 7
    sportswizuhrd 223 8
    Azubuike24 204 7
    Laley23 200 7
    Mulva 190 8
  • wildcats20
    Through the first 2 today...
    Member Total Rem. Plyrs.
    Big_Mirg_ZHS 354 5
    Wildcats20 292 6
    sportchampps 249 8
    Terry_Tate 246 4
    JSchilling 237 7
    Azubuike24 237 6
    Gerb131 232 5
    Mulva 230 8
    sportswizuhrd 228 8
    Iliketurtles 227 8
    Laley23 211 7
  • Laley23
    Current Standings
    1. Mirg 376
    2. Wildcats 328
    3. Jschil 310
    4. Wiz 291
    5. Az 273
    6. sportchampps 272
    7. Mulva 270
    8. Terry 266
    9. Laley23 251
    10. Gerb 251
    11. Turtles 248
  • Laley23
    Projected Results
    1. Mirg 516.7
    2. Wildcats 468.2
    3. sportschampps 449.6
    4. Mulva 448.6
    5. Turtles 445.2
    6. Jschiil 431.6
    7. Wiz 406.8
    8. Terry 372.5
    9. Az 372.3
    10. Gerb 357.4
    11. Laley23 354.6
  • Laley23
    Those are with just the UCLA - Cincy game to go. Should be accurate, but I updated all games today quickly.
  • Big_Mirg_ZHS
    Let's go Big 10!
  • wildcats20
    This is what I have..
    Member Total Rem. Plyrs.
    Big_Mirg_ZHS 377 5
    Wildcats20 338 5
    JSchilling 310 5
    sportswizuhrd 291 5
    Mulva 286 8
    Laley23 282 4
    Azubuike24 278 4
    Terry_Tate 276 4
    sportchampps 272 7
    Iliketurtles 259 8
    Gerb131 251 5
  • wildcats20
    Did we ever decide what the payment breakdown would be after only having 11?
  • Azubuike24
    FYI, I do have everyone's money now.

    Thanks
  • Big_Mirg_ZHS
    Do point numbers seem higher this year? Is that a
    product of 11 teams? Or higher scores?
  • wildcats20
    This is how it was after the 2nd round last year...fairly close.
    wildcats20;1788357 wrote:This is what I have...
    Member Total Rem. Plyrs.
    Jschilling 355 5
    Big_Mirg_ZHS 315 6
    birddog23 296 8
    Mulva 294 7
    Terry_Tate 287 5
    Iliketurtles 264 5
    sportchampps 257 9
    sportswizhurd 242 3
    Wildcats20 240 3
    Terry's Friend 237 3
    Laley23 218 3
    Azubuike24 191 4
  • wildcats20
    Some of those might be a few points off, as I see I made multiple corrections after lol. But still fairly close, a little higher this year.
  • Iliketurtles
    264 last year with 5 players left... 259 this year with 8 players left. At least I'm consistent. Damn I suck.
  • Laley23
    Iliketurtles;1843122 wrote:264 last year with 5 players left... 259 this year with 8 players left. At least I'm consistent. Damn I suck.
    Not sure I've ever been even top half of this thing. Yet, in regular season fantasy, worst finish is I think 4th lol.
  • wildcats20
    Laley23;1843128 wrote:Not sure I've ever been even top half of this thing. Yet, in regular season fantasy, worst finish is I think 4th lol.
    How do you figure your projections on the spreadsheet? Just by seed?
  • Terry_Tate
    wildcats20;1843135 wrote:How do you figure your projections on the spreadsheet? Just by seed?
    Pretty sure it's by True Seed rank. 1-2 projected for 6 games, 3-4 for 5 games, 5-8 for 4 games, etc.

    And yeah, I don't think I've ever won a single category doing the Tournament Pick Em, lol. Hopefully Frank Mason III can get me something this year.
  • Laley23
    wildcats20;1843135 wrote:How do you figure your projections on the spreadsheet? Just by seed?
    Terry_Tate;1843138 wrote:Pretty sure it's by True Seed rank. 1-2 projected for 6 games, 3-4 for 5 games, 5-8 for 4 games, etc.

    And yeah, I don't think I've ever won a single category doing the Tournament Pick Em, lol. Hopefully Frank Mason III can get me something this year.
    This, plus if the last game wasn't a "0" for a seed who wasn't projected to win, it projects him for another game. Only part it can't figure out is in these rounds like Wisconsin plays Florida...it projects both for only that game. Next year I might factor in the true seeds into the bracket, and add a cell for next games, and whether a lower seed should win or not. Wouldn't eliminate that issue totally, but would give at least a 2 game out projecting that's accurate. As of now, basically just projects all higher seeds to win all games, and if there is an upset that team to play just the 1 next game...

    Also fucks up if a player has a 0 but they win. It's happened a few times over the years, but not enough for me to care enough to fix ahah. It corrects itself when they eventually score the next game.
  • Big_Mirg_ZHS
    1-4 today, that hurt... fuck gonzaga that is all. Go Wisky.
  • wildcats20
    Member Total Rem. Plyrs.
    Big_Mirg_ZHS 440 2
    Wildcats20 363 5
    JSchilling 335 4
    Mulva 332 5
    sportswizuhrd 317 5
    Laley23 315 3
    sportchampps 314 6
    Iliketurtles 311 6
    Azubuike24 307 4
    Gerb131 286 2
    Terry_Tate 276 4
  • Terry_Tate
    Cool

    Edit:. Wait, I should have had 26 for Frank Mason III, that's not in there correct? Pretty sure I was at 276 before.
  • Big_Mirg_ZHS
    Hopefully I can ride Josh Jackson off into the sunset.
  • wildcats20
    Terry_Tate;1843662 wrote:Cool

    Edit:. Wait, I should have had 26 for Frank Mason III, that's not in there correct? Pretty sure I was at 276 before.
    I might have missed it. I'll check later today. I'm busy til this evening.
  • Laley23
    If Kennard hadn't been a little bitch, and Duke won, I'd have a shot. Oh well.