SEC Talk

• cats gone wild

  My first post on this site...........so, whats' yall's thoughts on the SEC this year?
  
  Geaux Tigers......btw
  
  And to all the bucks fans on here, I love you guys!! Keep it real.
• hoops23

  

  That the year is almost over
  
  Bama and UF
  
  I'm taking (hoping) Bama to win the SEC.
• cats gone wild

  Im taking UF........but boy was this a down year for the SEC. Still on top though.
• cats gone wild

  Where are the avatars?
• enigmaax

  Will Alabama and Florida both be undefeated going into the title game?
  
  If they are, and Texas loses, who plays the winner in the national title game?
  
  If they aren't, will a one loss SEC champion still get into the national title game?
• HeathAlum21

  I think it is a down year for college football in general, as far as talented teams. I'll take Florida.
  
  As for the avatars, it was posted that things are being tweaked and they will be back shortly.
• cats gone wild

  http://www.youtube.com/user/OFFSIDESwithLSUfreek#p/u/0/xkbaEpBOZgk
  
  
  See the money bag on the left?
  
  
  
  (look at the visitor sideline)
  
  
• centralbucksfan

  Stop your whining about the missed call cats! It happens, it has happened many times this year. Heck, USC first TD vs OSU on 4th down, was NOT a TD. Last week vs PSU...PSU only TD never crossed the line.
  Yes, it was a bad, missed call vs LSU. But that single play did not cost them the game. And when you go on the road, you expect to have adversity and not get calls. Thats sports in general when your on the road. To win a big game like that, you have to overcome it. Bama was and is the better team, period.
  SEC...similar to the Big Ten in the early 2000's...big two, little "rest". LSU is good. After that...no one else is very impressive. Fla and Bama carry this conference, as they did last year...thats the bottom line.
• enigmaax

  I, for one, am glad to see the cats vs. cbf feud will carry on and knows no cyber boundaries.
• Cleveland Buck

  

  All is right in the world.
• cats gone wild

  I was wondering if cbf was on this forum. I guess I will get to argue with the little troll-boy on this site too. Just messin with ya cbf. Its nice to see that our feuding will continue as enigmaax said.
  
  Btw, am I the only fan of an SEC school on this site thus far? No bamaboy/girl, g8tr, az, or OK?
• Manhattan Buckeye

  "2 or 3 good teams in the whole conference"
  
  Yeah, I agree but the top 2 (Bama, Florida) are really good....LSU is decent, lot of talent but young. The middle teams (Auburn, Georgia, Miss, SC) aren't much better than Big 10 middle fodder.
• enigmaax

  ccrunner609 wrote: the SEC isnt all they are cracked up to be. 2 or 3 good teams in the whole conference. The OOC schedules are pathetic.
  
  
  Not one quality win for anyone.

  What OOC wins do you consider to be quality for anyone this year?
• enigmaax

  Manhattan Buckeye wrote: "2 or 3 good teams in the whole conference"
  
  Yeah, I agree but the top 2 (Bama, Florida) are really good....LSU is decent, lot of talent but young. The middle teams (Auburn, Georgia, Miss, SC) aren't much better than Big 10 middle fodder.

  I don't know, the middle of the Big Ten has losses to Northern Illinois, Central Michigan, and Syracuse. The worst OOC loss of those SEC teams you mentioned is Oklahoma State. Neither conference played overwhelming OOC competition, but only one conference won the games they should.
• enigmaax

  ccrunner609 wrote: Saw an old post on the huddle a few years back that lists the top 25 teams with the easiest OOC schedule over the past 10 years.......it was practically all SEC. LSU was #1.

  I highly doubt that being one of two/three schools with multiple national titles this decade that LSU is worried about random assessments of their OOC schedule.
  
  I hear the argument, but I don't know what you are arguing. What is the SEC "cracked up to be" and what is false about it? Is it the best conference? If not, who is better? Outside of that, I don't know what misperception you are trying to create so that you can shoot it down.
• enigmaax

  ccrunner609 wrote: THe SEC has championships because the system we are in is flat out giving it to them.
  
  If we had a playoff I would bet that the SEC would have 1 at the most.

  Yeah, didn't figure you were going to have any substance. I'll go with a playoff system would make the SEC look even better. LSU's 2003 title would have been legitimized when they beat USC in the title game, instead of sharing the title by beating a crappy Oklahoma team.
  
  LSU probably would've been an 8-seed in 2006, beaten Ohio State and ended up playing Florida for the title (Florida still wins).
  
  Georgia, who was playing as good or better than anyone at the end of 2007 would've run to the title game and beat LSU in 2007.
  
  So you can bet all you want, it isn't backing up your point at all.