How Bad did Akron Get Screwed?

• ernest_t_bass

  

  I think the MAC is going to be a fun conference to watch this year. BGSU playing well, Akron decent, Buffalo not too bad. Glad they're showing the conference more on Nat. TV.
• Tiernan

  WebFire;1501124 wrote:It's ok. I don't mind playing a little bit since it's his own thread. I wouldn't do it on threads that actually matter.

  All threads matter deeply Webster...and dont you forget it!
• WebFire

  Only threads with Quick Reply matter. Which means none matter right now.
• superman

  Sonofanump;1501075 wrote:[MENTION=215]superman[/MENTION]. No way to call PI either way on that play. I don't care if #11 white pushes #38 black and he falls to the ground. Not going to call it.

  Then you're a shitty ref.
• vball10set

  Sonofanump;1501075 wrote:superman...No way to call PI either way on that play. I don't care if #11 white pushes #38 black and he falls to the ground. Not going to call it.

  This, in a nutshell, is the inconsistency that drives coaches, players and fans crazy.
• hasbeen

  

  Tiernan;1501089 wrote:But nobody else believes that Webbie...America thinks Akron won that game and now you got to live down Appi State and Zippy State. Egg on the face Brady.

  You don't speak for America, you fuck.
• Sonofanump

  vball10set;1501984 wrote:This, in a nutshell, is the inconsistency that drives coaches, players and fans crazy.

  Did you want the grab by #38 prior to #11's push? Did you want them both called a foul, one of the two called a foul (which one?), or neither? Which of the four do you want?
  
  I won't list the fifth option.
• vball10set

  Sonofanump;1502151 wrote:Did you want the grab by #38 prior to #11's push? Did you want them both called a foul, one of the two called a foul (which one?), or neither? Which of the four do you want?
  
  I won't list the fifth option.

  As LJ pointed out, it doesn't matter what I 'want' or say, 'cause you're going to defend your brethren. You listed one option in your post (I don't care if #11 white pushes #38 black and he falls to the ground. Not going to call it.), and I responded to that.
• Sonofanump

  vball10set;1502183 wrote:As LJ pointed out, it doesn't matter what I 'want' or say, 'cause you're going to defend your brethren. You listed one option in your post (I don't care if #11 white pushes #38 black and he falls to the ground. Not going to call it.), and I responded to that.

  I really have no idea what you think should be called. A foul on #11 white, a foul on #38 black, a foul on both, or a foul on neither?
• WebFire

  Sonofanump;1502244 wrote:I really have no idea what you think should be called. A foul on #11 white, a foul on #38 black, a foul on both, or a foul on neither?

  Was a foul committed?
• Sonofanump

  WebFire;1502287 wrote:Was a foul committed?

  
  According to superman and vball10. But what do I know, my opinion is irrelevant here, I am only here to defend, not to educate.
• vball10set

  Sonofanump;1502292 wrote:According to superman and vball10. But what do I know, my opinion is irrelevant here, I am only here to defend, not to educate.

  
  
• vball10set

  Sonofanump;1502292 wrote:According to superman and vball10. But what do I know, my opinion is irrelevant here, I am only here to defend, not to educate.

  
  Where did I say a foul was committed? I just responded to your comment regarding not calling something that's there because of the situation. Please, don't read into something that's not there.
• Sonofanump

  vball10set;1502299 wrote:Where did I say a foul was committed? I just responded to your comment regarding not calling something that's there because of the situation. Please, don't read into something that's not there.

  I did not say anything about the situation. I would not call it due to the action.
• WebFire

  If there is a foul, call it. I have never agreed with not calling a foul because it's the end of a game.
• vball10set

  Sonofanump;1502313 wrote:I did not say anything about the situation. I would not call it due to the action.

  
  
  Sorry, I misunderstood you then. However, I still don't understand the comment "I don't care if #11 white pushes #38 black and he falls to the ground. Not going to call it." Is it an action/reaction thing?
• Me?

  

  Not nearly as bad as Wisconsin.
• vball10set

  Me?;1502342 wrote:Not nearly as bad as Wisconsin.

  Not even close. IMO there wasn't even a foul at the end of the tsun/Akron game...the ending of the Wisky game was just atrocious all the way around.
• ernest_t_bass

  

  sonofanump is the worst football official on this thread!!!!!1!!!
• Heretic

  

  ernest_t_bass;1502357 wrote:sonofanump is the worst football official on this thread!!!!!1!!!

  So you're saying you only ref basketball?
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Heretic;1502365 wrote:So you're saying you only ref basketball?

  
• Sonofanump

  ernest_t_bass;1502357 wrote:sonofanump is the worst football official on this thread!!!!!1!!!

  link?
• Tiernan

  I definitely speak for ALL of America when I say everyone outside the borders of Pissagain think the Zips got screwed and actually won that game.
• Pick6

  

  My biggest issue was the respotting of the ball. It clearly wasnt a touchdown, yet thats what the refs were supposedly reviewing (right?). The Zips got screwed the worst way possible in that not only didnt get a TD (obviously), but took away the first down as well. Believe they would have won 1st and goal at the 1 with 24 secs left.
• WebFire

  Pick6;1502443 wrote:My biggest issue was the respotting of the ball. It clearly wasnt a touchdown, yet thats what the refs were supposedly reviewing (right?). The Zips got screwed the worst way possible in that not only didnt get a TD (obviously), but took away the first down as well. Believe they would have won 1st and goal at the 1 with 24 secs left.

  No, they were never reviewing for a TD, they were in fact reviewing the spot. And they seemed short to me and the announcers both.