Archive

(2) Ohio State def. Buffalo, 40-20

  • Rotinaj
    Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
    No.
  • LJ
    Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
    Different positions genius.
  • Automatik
    Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
    lol you serious? Or drunk?
  • Tiernan
    LJ;1494014 wrote:Different positions genius.
    Are they both DL / LB players dillweed?
  • LJ
    Tiernan;1494021 wrote:Are they both DL / LB players dillweed?

    Mack is a pure LB.

    Clowney is a pure DE
  • Mulva
    Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
    You're stupid even by drunk driving standards.
  • Tiernan
    LJ;1494022 wrote:Mack is a pure LB.

    Clowney is a pure DE
    As an OLB and DE they both have rush and perimeter containment responsibilities that are very similar and often evenore so in the NFL but since you've never actually coached any football you wouldn't know much about any of that would you?
  • LJ
    Tiernan;1494033 wrote:As an OLB and DE they both have rush and perimeter containment responsibilities that are very similar and often evenore so in the NFL but since you've never actually coached any football you wouldn't know much about any of that would you?

    Lol!!!! Clowney is not a stand up end with pass coverage responsibilities. Macks primary responsibility is to scrape and fill and to drop into pass coverage. Clowneys main responsibility is to set the edge and rush the passer
  • LJ
    I also played in a 3-3-3-2 stack defense in HS. I can tell you from experience that they are not comparable in the least
  • Tiernan
    LJ;1494038 wrote:I also played in a 3-3-3-2 stack defense in HS. I can tell you from experience that they are not comparable in the least
    I can hear Springsteen singing "Glory Days..."
  • LJ
    Tiernan;1494046 wrote:I can hear Springsteen singing "Glory Days..."

    With you drunkenly yelling "freebird!!!!" From the crowd
  • Tiernan
    SKYYYYNYYRRD!
  • WebFire
    LJ;1494035 wrote:Lol!!!! Clowney is not a stand up end with pass coverage responsibilities. Macks primary responsibility is to scrape and fill and to drop into pass coverage. Clowneys main responsibility is to set the edge and rush the passer
    So what? The statement made was that Mack would be the best DEFENDER OSU faced all year. Not the best at a certain position.
  • LJ
    WebFire;1494065 wrote:So what? The statement made was that Mack would be the best DEFENDER OSU faced all year. Not the best at a certain position.

    What other projected top 5 picks will OSU fave this year?

    Yeah thought so :rolleyes:
  • #1DBag
    Khalil Mack is on Facebook.
  • WebFire
    LJ;1494070 wrote:What other projected top 5 picks will OSU fave this year?

    Yeah thought so :rolleyes:
    That wasn't even the point. The point is you are busting balls about position comparisons when it's not even relevant.
  • Pick6
    WebFire;1494079 wrote:That wasn't even the point. The point is you are busting balls about position comparisons when it's not even relevant.
    It was relevant because Tiernan brought the comparison to Clowney up.
  • WebFire
    Pick6;1494080 wrote:It was relevant because Tiernan brought the comparison to Clowney up.
    And OSU doesn't face Clowney. So why the argument anyway?
  • Midstate01
    Not going to read through this pissing match but Mack was a stud. He looks the part and certainly plays it. He's really really good. Yea he is definitely the best defender they will see all year. But other teams will have mulitple studs which makes a bigger difference
  • Automatik
    WebFire;1494079 wrote:That wasn't even the point. The point is you are busting balls about position comparisons when it's not even relevant.
    It was in reference to to this. He's not.
    Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
  • WebFire
    Automatik;1494189 wrote:It was in reference to to this. He's not.
    I know why he said. But OSU doesn't face Clowney and it wasn't a position argument. Doesn't matter to me. Carry on.
  • LJ
    WebFire;1494190 wrote:I know why he said. But OSU doesn't face Clowney and it wasn't a position argument. Doesn't matter to me. Carry on.

    OK? So you are trying to rile up an argument that never happened with the person who never originally made the comparison for what reason then? Trolling eh? Got it. Carry on.
  • Tiernan
    My original post was just to reference the comparison of two standout defensive players as forces to be dealt with not necessarily a "position by position" comparison. But I do still maintain a DE and OLB have some similar responsibilities in many schemes.
  • Tiernan
    I will rile up the locals by stating Mack outplayed our own Butkus candidate by about 1,000x yesterday. Cramping or not Shazier didn't show up yesterday.
  • Fly4Fun
    Tiernan;1494200 wrote:I will rile up the locals by stating Mack outplayed our own Butkus candidate by about 1,000x yesterday. Cramping or not Shazier didn't show up yesterday.
    Really?

    Shazier wasn't amazing but he had a solid game. I think he had somewhere between 6-8 tackles and 1 TFL (I don't have the official stats but I remember seeing him in on quite a few plays). It wasn't a standout game but to say he didn't show up is idiotic.