Archive

Who do you WANT to win?

  • vball10set
    This poll isn't for who you think will win, but who you'll be pullin' for.
  • killer_ewok
    Te'o
  • Fly4Fun
    Neither, I'll be less annoyed if ND wins.
  • Terry_Tate
    Notre Dame
  • ytownfootball
    Do. Not. Care.

    I will only derive enjoyment from whomever loses, and it doesn't matter who.
  • Rotinaj
    Id like to see ND win over Saban.
  • believer
    ytownfootball;1334480 wrote:Do. Not. Care.

    I will only derive enjoyment from whomever loses, and it doesn't matter who.
    this
  • vball10set
    killer_ewok;1334457 wrote:Te'o
    wrong poll :o
  • killer_ewok
    vball10set;1334506 wrote:wrong poll :o

    Tapatalk....can't see a poll. LOL
  • lhslep134
    Notre Dame. I'd rather deal with ND arrogance than an entire conference's arrogance.
  • Ironman92
    As long as the referees don't blow a couple crucial game-changing calls and not too much luck is involved....don't really care.

    I'm going in rooting marginally for Bama because I think Bama is the better team and I want the best team to win...but ND will have the chance to prove me otherwise.
  • IggyPride00
    Bama.

    People think the SEC and their fans are cocky, they haven't seen anything compared to what it would be like with ND and their fans running around with a National Title.
  • killer_ewok
    IggyPride00;1334589 wrote:Bama.

    People think the SEC and their fans are cocky, they haven't seen anything compared to what it would be like with ND and their fans running around with a National Title.
    I can honestly say I'd be genuinely elated and not cocky. Of course, I'd have a pretty good response for certain folks who like to throw the same old criticisms out there or to those who will attempt to discredit the national championship should ND win it. But other than excitement....I wouldn't go around running off at the mouth unless somebody started talking some crazy mess that simply wasn't true.
  • cats gone wild
    I wish they both could lose. Dont like either team and ND would lose to the top 6 teams of the SEC. Add to the poll Do. Not. Care.
  • Crimson streak
    cats gone wild;1334633 wrote:I wish they both could lose. Dont like either team and ND would lose to the top 6 teams of the SEC. Add to the poll Do. Not. Care.

    Lol another sec homer go figure.
  • Terry_Tate
    cats gone wild;1334633 wrote:I wish they both could lose. Dont like either team and ND would lose to the top 6 teams of the SEC. Add to the poll Do. Not. Care.

    Lol at Notre Dame being the 7th best SEC team. That's a joke.
  • cats gone wild
    Crimson streak;1334635 wrote:Lol another sec homer go figure.
    Do you not think that ND would get beat by most of the top 10 teams? Just feel lucky that you got to barely beat BYU, Pitt, a give me game against Stanford, and a game vs USC without Barkley playing. Luck of the Irish indeed.
  • cats gone wild
    Terry_Tate;1334639 wrote:Lol at Notre Dame being the 7th best SEC team. That's a joke.
    The only teams ND could beat out of the top 6 sec teams would be USCe and UGA. And thats being nice.
  • karen lotz
    cats gone wild;1334633 wrote:I wish they both could lose. Dont like either team and ND would lose to the top 6 teams of the SEC. Add to the poll Do. Not. Care.

    :dismissivehandwank:
  • dlazz
    killer_ewok;1334512 wrote:Tapatalk....can't see a poll. LOL

    ROFL
  • Crimson streak
    cats gone wild;1334641 wrote:Do you not think that ND would get beat by most of the top 10 teams? Just feel lucky that you got to barely beat BYU, Pitt, a give me game against Stanford, and a game vs USC without Barkley playing. Luck of the Irish indeed.

    A give me against Stanford? Byu our starting qb was out. The USC game was never in doubt Barkley more than likely would not have made a difference. Went to Oklahoma and beat their ass. But the sec is so great cause they beat up on fcs and sun belt teams. Then they get a high ranking when they play each other so it looks like they play such great teams when in reality outside of 2-3 teams the sec is mediocre.
  • cats gone wild
    Crimson streak;1334654 wrote:A give me against Stanford? Byu our starting qb was out. The USC game was never in doubt Barkley more than likely would not have made a difference. Went to Oklahoma and beat their ass. But the sec is so great cause they beat up on fcs and sun belt teams. Then they get a high ranking when they play each other so it looks like they play such great teams when in reality outside of 2-3 teams the sec is mediocre.
    So.....Clemson and FSU should of beat USCe and UF right? Michigan should of beat Bama, right? Btw, Stanford lost to Washington lol. LSU killed Washington. And USC game was never in doubt even if Barkley played? Right.......
    If the high rankings for the SEC come from beating each other and playing fcs schools, then why do they have 8 titles since the BCS era started? Why do they play better in BCS games and bowl games? Anyone debating whether the SEC is legit or not is nuts. 2-3 good teams and the rest is mediocre? I didnt know 6 teams ranked in the top 10 is a bunch of mediocre teams.
  • Pick6
    Notre Dame, but I really wish both could lose. Too bad there cant be a tie and OSU be the AP National Champs.
  • Crimson streak
    cats gone wild;1334667 wrote:So.....Clemson and FSU should of beat USCe and UF right? Michigan should of beat Bama, right? Btw, Stanford lost to Washington lol. LSU killed Washington. And USC game was never in doubt even if Barkley played? Right.......
    If the high rankings for the SEC come from beating each other and playing fcs schools, then why do they have 8 titles since the BCS era started? Why do they play better in BCS games and bowl games? Anyone debating whether the SEC is legit or not is nuts. 2-3 good teams and the rest is mediocre? I didnt know 6 teams ranked in the top 10 is a bunch of mediocre teams.

    So Stanford lost on a Thursday night game at Washington after knocking off #1 USC. Yeah because upsets never happen. And your wrong about the sec winning bowl games and bcs games. Sure the sec has 1-2 elite teams every year ill give them that and that's why they have won the last 6 championship games. But South Carolina is not that good Florida has an absolutely terrible offense. And same with lsu. We will see jan 7th how great the sec is
  • cats gone wild
    Crimson streak;1334679 wrote:So Stanford lost on a Thursday night game at Washington after knocking off #1 USC. Yeah because upsets never happen. And your wrong about the sec winning bowl games and bcs games. Sure the sec has 1-2 elite teams every year ill give them that and that's why they have won the last 6 championship games. But South Carolina is not that good Florida has an absolutely terrible offense. And same with lsu. We will see jan 7th how great the sec is
    USCe beat UGA by 4 touchdowns and beat Clemson. UF beat USCe, A&M, LSU, and FSU with that terrible offense. YOu wont be anywhere to be found after the bowl games.
    USC showed america what I said at the beginning of the year. So the "#1" argument doesnt work for an excuse for Stanford getting beat by Washington. As I said, Lsu absolutely killed Washington.