Archive

How bad would the Chiefs stomp Alabama?

  • sleeper
    70-0.

    Apparently Spurrier thinks Alabama could beat an NFL team.

    http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8579380/steve-spurrier-says-alabama-crimson-tide-beat-nfl-teams
    "Alabama, gosh, they look like they could beat a couple of those NFL teams that I've watched on Sundays," Spurrier told "The Dan Patrick Show" on Wednesday. "I think a lot of the oddsmakers out there, that usually know what's going on, I'd guess Alabama would be favored by a little bit."

  • queencitybuckeye
    By three or four touchdowns, minimum.
  • Pick6
    Spurrier is an idiot.
  • Fly4Fun
    Really a dumb topic and just SEC people trying to boast about their conference...


    SEC! SEC! SEC!
  • Gblock
    cheifs would roll them up..however i think alabama could get more than 7 yards rushing against the 49ers unlike arizona did the other nigh
  • FatHobbit
    What does Spurrier know about beating NFL teams?
  • gorocks99
    Chiefs by at least 50. Their o-line would blow Alabama's d-line on their backsides.
  • Gblock
    FatHobbit;1309948 wrote:What does Spurrier know about beating NFL teams?
    qft
  • vball10set
    Ridiculous statement by the head ball coach, ridiculous I say.
  • lhslep134
    Do you guys think Spurrier was being serious? I mean he says something he clearly knows isn't true about Alabama the week of their biggest game of the year. Quite the gamesmanship from the HBC.
  • Heretic
    lhslep134;1310005 wrote:Do you guys think Spurrier was being serious? I mean he says something he clearly knows isn't true about Alabama the week of their biggest game of the year. Quite the gamesmanship from the HBC.
    Or he might be trying to get attention away from how he used classy comments from Clemson's Sweeney about Lattimore as an opportunity to take a dig at him, since at least Yahoo pointed out his lack of class spoiling the moment.
  • Dr. KnOiTaLL
    Spurrier was simply blowing smoke up their rear... Definitely gamesmanship. This comment was talked about on PTI, and the point they brought up is this, Alabama has 15-20 NFL players on their squad. The Chiefs have 52. Simply put, just an absolutely ridiculous comment.
  • Tiernan
    Just another reason there should be a kill bounty on Spurrier.
  • se-alum
    Gblock;1309932 wrote:cheifs would roll them up..however i think alabama could get more than 7 yards rushing against the 49ers unlike arizona did the other nigh
    I wouldn't bet on that.
  • ernest_t_bass
    I bet Alabama couldn't even beat Notre Dame, b/c this is Notre Dame's year!
  • vball10set
    ernest_t_bass;1310056 wrote:I bet Alabama couldn't even beat Notre Dame, b/c this is Notre Dame's year!
    I hope we get to see it on Jan. 7th ;)
  • Classyposter58
    KC would win by 3-4 scores easy. It's like when Mooney played St Iggy this year. Mooney is very good, has a ton of talent, but those guys are on a whole other level and it wasn't even close
  • Azubuike24
    9-6 Chiefs...in OT.
  • sportswizuhrd
    I'm surprised that some of you haven't said that Alabama would pay some NFL players to play for them if this happened.
  • sleeper
    Dr. KnOiTaLL;1310019 wrote:Spurrier was simply blowing smoke up their rear... Definitely gamesmanship. This comment was talked about on PTI, and the point they brought up is this, Alabama has 15-20 NFL players on their squad. The Chiefs have 52. Simply put, just an absolutely ridiculous comment.
    I think Alabama has more than 15-20 players, but they are all less than Rookies where KC has a full team of NFL talent.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Alabama wouldn't score, the Chiefs would score every possession unless Cassel made a truly bonehead pass.

    There is a big difference from a physicality standpoint in the NFL - when you are a professional there aren't restrictions on practicing or weight lifting. I mean when a standout like Mark Ingram can't it get done in the NFL you know that college success does not necessarily translate to NFL success.
  • sleeper
    Manhattan Buckeye;1310389 wrote:Alabama wouldn't score, the Chiefs would score every possession unless Cassel made a truly bonehead pass.

    There is a big difference from a physicality standpoint in the NFL - when you are a professional there aren't restrictions on practicing or weight lifting. I mean when a standout like Mark Ingram can't it get done in the NFL you know that college success does not necessarily translate to NFL success.
    Exactly. A good college basketball team has a much better chance of winning against a pro team than in football. I'm still about 99% sure that Kentucky last year could stand toe to toe with the Bobcats.
  • vball10set
    Dr. KnOiTaLL;1310019 wrote:This comment was talked about on PTI, and the point they brought up is this, Alabama has 15-20 NFL players on their squad. The Chiefs have 52.
    This

    /thread
  • said_aouita
    55-3


    I'll give them three just because of the Chiefs coach. He'd do something stupid enough to allow one big play and 'bama gets into FG range.
  • Azubuike24
    "The Miami Hurricanes could beat the Cincinnati Bengals."