Archive

Can't read? Can't write? Kent State...

  • Laley23
    superman;1259494 wrote:But it was a turnover, Kent got the ball.
    That doesnt make it a turnover. Same way going for it on 4th and getting stopped isnt a turnover. Kent got the ball, but because the other team never possessed it, they cant advance it. They are just awarded possession where they recover it.
  • superman
    so, there is no such thing as a turnover on downs?
  • Laley23
    superman;1260860 wrote:so, there is no such thing as a turnover on downs?
    It is a turnover on downs. You will not see it in the "turnover" column in the box score.

    I do stats for football for a living. I know what a turnover is.
  • superman
    So it is a turnover on downs?
  • ts1227
    A muffed punt is not a fumble. To be a fumble, the receiving team must possess the football, then lose control. In the case of a fumble, the ball is live and can be returned by the team that recovers the ball. In the case of a muffed punt, it is possible for the punting team to recover the ball and continue the drive, but at least in NCAA and NFL rules, they cannot advance the ball on that same play
    ..
  • karen lotz
    superman;1260886 wrote:So it is a turnover on downs?

    its not a difficult concept
  • Sonofanump
    karen lotz;1260900 wrote:its not a difficult concept
    You have overestimated the fellow members of the OC.
  • superman
    I understand the concept, just think its a dumb rule and was asking sonofanump the reasoning behind the rule. Laley felt the need to put in her two cents when she obviously didn't know the answer. Therefore, I chose to be obtuse.
  • Terry_Tate
    This is the biggest fail of a play I've ever seen. I just love everything about it.
  • SportsAndLady
    superman;1260939 wrote:I understand the concept, just think its a dumb rule and was asking sonofanump the reasoning behind the rule. Laley felt the need to put in her two cents when she obviously didn't know the answer. Therefore, I chose to be obtuse.
    Are you 10? lol
  • superman
    SportsAndLady;1261022 wrote:Are you 10? lol
    Is laley not a female?
  • vball10set
    superman;1261641 wrote:Is laley not a female?
    yes, laley is not a female
  • Laley23
    superman;1261641 wrote:Is laley not a female?
    No, I am a male.
  • SportsAndLady
    superman;1261641 wrote:Is laley not a female?
    How many stat tracking females w/ 15000 posts on a sports message board do you know?!
  • vball10set
    SportsAndLady;1261787 wrote:How many stat tracking females w/ 15000 posts on a sports message board do you know?!
    This, and justin would never make a female a mod :p
  • superman
    SportsAndLady;1261787 wrote:How many stat tracking females w/ 15000 posts on a sports message board do you know?!
    I thought one. I have no idea where the idea came from, but it was in my head that Laley was a female for some reason.
  • Fly4Fun
    vball10set;1261790 wrote:This, and justin would never make a female a mod :p
    SEJ is really a man?
  • GoChiefs
    Fly4Fun;1261979 wrote:SEJ is really a man?

    And zambrown?
  • Fly4Fun
    GoChiefs;1261981 wrote:And zambrown?
    She's a Michigan fan so I don't care for her. Hell, even SEJ is a Michigan fan. Is this a conspiracy?
  • vball10set
    Fly4Fun;1261979 wrote:SEJ is really a man?
    GoChiefs;1261981 wrote:And zambrown?
    My post was made tongue-in-cheek, and to be honest, I hadn't a clue that either of these mods were female :o
  • ts1227
    Fly4Fun;1261988 wrote:She's a Michigan fan so I don't care for her. Hell, even SEJ is a Michigan fan. Is this a conspiracy?
    False. All mods are Notre Dame fans and sympathisers

    /sleeper