Ohio Chatter DEV

Terry_Tate

Azubuike24;1111819 wrote:Missouri vs the top 50 = 11-3, overall 30-4, Conference Champions
Ohio State vs the top 50 = 11-4, overall 28-6, Conference Champions*
Ohio State vs the top 50 = 11-5, overall 27-7, Conference Champions*

*Barring the outcome of tomorrow's game.

I'm not sure how, presented with that, Missouri doesn't get the final #1 seed.

1. Kentucky
2. Syracuse
3. North Carolina*
4. Missouri
5. B1G Winner
6. Kansas
7. B1G Loser
8. Duke

What about vs the top 25?

Azubuike24

Missouri 4-2
Ohio State 7-2
Michigan State 7-2

It's really close. You have to wonder if the B1G title game will "really matter" this year considering 3 of the top 8 seed lines pretty much hinge on the outcome.

If it "doesn't matter", you have to figure Missouri is the fourth #1.

Cleveland Buck

The Big Ten Champion deserves a spot because the winner would have the best wins of any team in the country. The gauntlet they had to run all year was brutal, and to come out with 9 top 25 wins (MSU) or 7 top 25 wins (Ohio State) would put them above any of the contenders for that spot.

I do think Missouri or Kansas deserve a #1 too. It is North Carolina that I don't think belongs up there, but they are going to get one regardless.

Syracuse:

Top 25: 4-0
26-50: 7-2

Kentucky:

Top 25: 3-1
26-50: 6-0

Michigan State:

Top 25: 8-5
26-50: 2-0

Missouri:

Top 25: 4-1
26-50: 7-2

Ohio State:

Top 25: 6-5
26-50: 3-0

Kansas:

Top 25: 5-4
26-50: 6-1

North Carolina:

Top 25: 3-4
26-50: 4-0

Duke:

Top 25: 5-4
26-50: 2-0

DeyDurkie5

kentucky
syracuse
UNC
MSU

centralbucksfan

Azubuike24;1111960 wrote:Missouri 4-2
Ohio State 7-2
Michigan State 7-2

It's really close. You have to wonder if the B1G title game will "really matter" this year considering 3 of the top 8 seed lines pretty much hinge on the outcome.

If it "doesn't matter", you have to figure Missouri is the fourth #1.

Mizzou SOS is poor. Their pre conference schedule was a joke. Their SOS doesn't compare to OSU, MSU or KU.

Laley23

centralbucksfan;1112133 wrote:Mizzou SOS is poor. Their pre conference schedule was a joke. Their SOS doesn't compare to OSU, MSU or KU.

I agree. I think MIZZOU has clinched the #5 spot. While KU has clinched the #6. OSU/MSU playing for #4 and #7 respectively.

ts1227

UK
Syracuse
UNC
B1G Champ

vball10set

ts1227;1112303 wrote:UK
Syracuse
UNC
B1G Champ

and this will be the only #1 seed to win their conference 'ship--when has that ever happened??

Cleveland Buck

North Carolina does not have the resume of a 1 seed. They should be Syracuse, Kentucky, Big Ten champion, and Missouri (or you could argue for Kansas).

Azubuike24

I think you probably see Missouri move up to the 4th #1 with the B1G winner getting the 3rd. UNC falls to a #2.

reclegend22

After the KU's loss in the semis of the Big XII Tournament to Baylor (not a bad loss by any means, but the Bears did go on to get pummeled in the championship by Mizzou), I really don't know why the Jayhawks are still a No. 1 consideration if Duke clearly isn't. And Duke definitely is not.

KANSAS
27-6
RPI 6
SOS 9
11-5 vs. RPI Top 50
Best wins: Ohio State, Missouri, Baylor, Georgetown
Worst loss: Davidson

DUKE
27-6
RPI 5
SOS 2
7-5 vs. RPI Top 50
Best wins: North Carolina, Kansas, Michigan State, Florida State, Michigan
Worst loss: Temple

So, KU has the edge in RPI Top 25 wins and won the Big XII regular-season.

Duke has the edge in RPI, SOS, has garnered the more impressive "best wins" with victories over three teams being considered as No. 1 seeds as of today (Michigan State, UNC and Kansas) and, as already stated, the Blue Devils already beat the Jayhawks this season.

Neither Duke nor Kansas deserve a No. 1 seed. I'd go with Syracuse, Kentucky, Missouri and Michigan State.

vball10set

Azubuike24;1112451 wrote:I think you probably see Missouri move up to the 4th #1 with the B1G winner getting the 3rd. UNC falls to a #2.

This is what it should be, but it won't be...the committee won't let it

Kentucky
Syracuse
UNC
MSU

ironman02

Carolina has the 5th toughest strength of schedule and their losses are ALL to Top 25 teams. They don't have any bad losses like Mizzou, Michigan State, Ohio State, etc. The ACC is definitely weak, but Carolina did win the regular season title outright. I also don't think they should be penalized for not winning the ACCT without Henson, especially when they lost a closely contested game in the championship. I'm sure there are arguments against Carolina getting a one seed, but when looking at the entire body of work, I don't think they're any worse than the other teams in contention. They have less losses than MSU, OSU, KU, and Mizzou has two losses to K-State and one to Oklahoma State.

KnightRyder

ironman02;1112676 wrote:Carolina has the 5th toughest strength of schedule and their losses are ALL to Top 25 teams. They don't have any bad losses like Mizzou, Michigan State, Ohio State, etc. The ACC is definitely weak, but Carolina did win the regular season title outright. I also don't think they should be penalized for not winning the ACCT without Henson, especially when they lost a closely contested game in the championship. I'm sure there are arguments against Carolina getting a one seed, but when looking at the entire body of work, I don't think they're any worse than the other teams in contention. They have less losses than MSU, OSU, KU, and Mizzou has two losses to K-State and one to Oklahoma State.

i think a 33 point gutting at the hands FSU is a bad loss

ironman02

I don't disagree with that.

I just meant that they didn't lose to any "bad" teams. All their losses were to teams in the Top 25, whereas some of the other contenders for one seeds had losses to teams outside the Top 50. In the eyes of the committee, a loss to a Top 25 team is a "good" loss. I'm sure they realized that the 33-point beatdown was an anomaly, and the close loss without Henson in the ACCT was more representative of a UNC/FSU matchup.

Archive

Top Seeds