Dominic Clarke facing OVI charge

• vball10set

  WebFire;1050905 wrote:This is a troll thread fail. Pretty bad when a Michigan fan recognizes it.

  reps :thumbup:
• LJ

  

  WebFire;1050905 wrote:This is a troll thread fail. Pretty bad when a Michigan fan recognizes it.

  SoS will just call you a troll, since that is how he responds to anyone that says he is trolling.
• ytownfootball

  

  This thread is a shining example of a basement worthy addition. Not sure what distinguishes it from others that end up there as a result of its' trolling nature, and I don't care just pointing that out. I'd actually prefer it stay here to illustrate the aching nature of sandyvag's anus.
• Speedofsand

  

  LMAO, its fine to have a thread about a Michigan player getting 10 days in jail, but if I start a thread about a Buckeye arrest, its trolling. :laugh::thumbup::rolleyes:
• ytownfootball

  

  Yep...it was already being talked about within a thread a day earlier. Go ahead and tell me how you weren't aware of it now :rolleyes:
• vball10set

  ytownfootball;1050997 wrote:Yep...it was already being talked about within a thread a day earlier. Go ahead and tell me how you weren't aware of it now :rolleyes:

  Well, sos isn't the brightest of posters, so he does have an excuse
• ytownfootball

  

  vball10set;1051001 wrote:Well, sos isn't the brightest of posters, so he does have an excuse

  So did the special needs chick who derped all over the bus and she still got an elbow to the pie hole...just sayin'.
• Speedofsand

  

  crytown, I don't read every thread, and I can honestly say I had not read that one. At all. I was fishing in Mosquito Lagoon all day the day before.
  Now tell me how this is the first time there has ever been a duplicate thread.
• Automatik

  

  Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?
• LJ

  

  Automatik;1051029 wrote:Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?

  No.
• Automatik

  

  Well he should be. Send him packing.
• vball10set

  Automatik;1051029 wrote:Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?

  LJ;1051031 wrote:No.

  This
• LJ

  

  Automatik;1051032 wrote:Well he should be. Send him packing.

  Maybe if it was his 2nd DUI or something like that. The BB gun thing was just stupid and honestly ridiculous he got charged DC for it. He will probably get a couple game suspension and all that good shit.
• ytownfootball

  

  Automatik;1051029 wrote:Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?

  I'm not sure. Given this is the first off field issue UM has to deal with it will say a lot about how things will be handled in the future. The BB gun thing was really a minor thing but an issue nonetheless, but the OVI thing (though reported "low level") is a lot more serious. More because I assume he's not of age and .02 is the threshold level for OVI of a person not 21. Hard to tell which way he goes imo.
• LJ

  

  ytownfootball;1051042 wrote:I'm not sure. Given this is the first off field issue UM has to deal with it will say a lot about how things will be handled in the future. The BB gun thing was really a minor thing but an issue nonetheless, but the OVI thing (though reported "low level") is a lot more serious. More because I assume he's not of age and .02 is the threshold level for OVI of a person not 21. Hard to tell which way he goes imo.

  Yeah if he was under .08 I say the penalty is less. 1 beer puts someone his size at like .04. Meyer said yesterday that he is not looking to make an example out of anyone.
• stroups

  

  Higher level OMVI's are .17 and up so I would assume anything below that would be a lower level.
• Heretic

  

  LJ;1050912 wrote:SoS will just call you a troll, since that is how he responds to anyone that says he is trolling.

  I've gotten the idea that he either has no concept of what trolling actually is OR he just has no self awareness. Kinda reminds me of one woman in my office, who constantly complains and gossips about people while also saying she doesn't like drama. Brings the lulz on a daily basis.
• WebFire

  Speedofsand;1050991 wrote:LMAO, its fine to have a thread about a Michigan player getting 10 days in jail, but if I start a thread about a Buckeye arrest, its trolling. :laugh::thumbup::rolleyes:

  While the intend of the Stonum thread was troll-like, it hadn't been discussed yet. But yours were way late, having already been discussed for like 3 days now.
• Oldman82

  Is this the first blemish of the Urban Meyer regime?
• Speedofsand

  

  WebFire;1051096 wrote:While the intend of the Stonum thread was troll-like, it hadn't been discussed yet. But yours were way late, having already been discussed for like 3 days now.

  Wrong. It was mentioned inside a thread the day before my thread. Not 3 days. Not that I really care, just tired of people spinning my posts. Besides, the espn story was new. He went to court yesterday.
• ytownfootball

  

  Speedofsand;1051109 wrote:Wrong. It was mentioned inside a thread the day before my thread. Not 3 days. Not that I really care, just tired of people spinning my posts.

  Here's the deal Einstein, I saw the news a day or two before you posted a thread about it, I was going to post a thread about it myself, but as most posters with half a walnut do, I checked the thread that was most likely to have news of it already being discussed, and wa la, there it was. You were simply too focused on trying to post around the wood you had to do so...you fail. Simple as that.
• WebFire

  Speedofsand;1051109 wrote:Wrong. It was mentioned inside a thread the day before my thread. Not 3 days. Not that I really care, just tired of people spinning my posts. Besides, the espn story was new. He went to court yesterday.

  "3 days now." Wedesday, Thursday, Friday.
  
  When you posted, it had been discussed for more than 24 hours and you didn't bother to check. And don't tell me your sole intention wasn't trolling.
• Speedofsand

  

  ytownfootball;1051120 wrote:Here's the deal Einstein, I saw the news a day or two before you posted a thread about it, I was going to post a thread about it myself, but as most posters with half a walnut do, I checked the thread that was most likely to have news of it already being discussed, and wa la, there it was.

  *viola Einstein. As I said, I don't read every thread here. He pleaded not guilty yesterday. So, I win and you fail again.
• Speedofsand

  

  WebFire;1051168 wrote:"3 days now." Wedesday, Thursday, Friday.
  
  When you posted, it had been discussed for more than 24 hours and you didn't bother to check. And don't tell me your sole intention wasn't trolling.

  "But yours were way late, having already been discussed for like 3 days now."

  barely 24 hours is not already 3 days. Thanks for failing.
• LJ

  

  Speedofsand;1051183 wrote:barely 24 hours is not already 3 days. Thanks for failing.

  It was posted Wed, this is the 3rd day on this website that this topic has been discussed.