The Game: Ohio State (6-5, 3-4) at #16 Michigan (9-2, 5-2)

• vball10set

  LJ;986495 wrote:Did I not just explain? I said I don't like it when just "reps" is posted. I think it's stupid. So I negged you for constantly doing it.

  LOL--are you fucking serious? you're negging me because you DON'T LIKE that I post "reps"? again, are you negging everyone, including the owner of this site, for posting "reps" ?? LJ, even for you, this is strange
• LJ

  

  vball10set;986501 wrote:LOL--are you fucking serious? you're negging me because you DON'T LIKE that I post "reps"? again, are you negging everyone, including the owner of this site, for posting "reps" ?? LJ, even for you, this is strange

  Are you confusing negative reps with infractions?
• vball10set

  LJ;986502 wrote:Are you confusing negative reps with infractions?

  absolutely not..the mere fact that you are neg repping me for someting you don't like, knowing that I'm not able to reciprocate, shows me a cowardly abuse of your modpower :thumbdown:
• LJ

  

  vball10set;986504 wrote:absolutely not..the mere fact that you are neg repping me for someting you don't like, knowing that I'm not able to reciprocate, shows me a cowardly abuse of your modpower :thumbdown:

  LOL!!!!!!
  
  Fucking cry more
• vball10set

  LJ;986506 wrote:LOL!!!!!!
  
  ****ing cry more

  LOL!!!!!! exactly what I expected, you clueless fuck
  
  
  edit: you cowardly cluless fuck :thumbup:
• WebFire

  ohiobucks1;986321 wrote:Knowing the Big10 theyll give it to Iowa's coach
  
  Deserves to go to Dantonio

  I think a great case can be made for Hoke.
• LJ

  

  vball10set;986507 wrote:LOL!!!!!! exactly what I expected, you clueless fuck

  I believe you are the clueless one, not even understanding that negative reps are for when someone posts something that you don't agree with.
• LJ

  

  WebFire;986509 wrote:I think a great case can be made for Hoke.

  If Michigan wins tomorrow I think Hoke should definitely be the coach of the year
• vball10set

  LJ;986510 wrote:I believe you are the clueless one, not even understanding that negative reps are for when someone posts something that you don't agree with.

  LJ, I fully undersatnd that, but until we are allowed to neg rep, I don't agree with it...now, do YOU understand?
• LJ

  

  vball10set;986513 wrote:LJ, I fully undersatnd that, but until we are allowed to neg rep, I don't agree with it...now, do YOU understand?

  I understand that you are whining about it. I also need you to understand that I don't give a shit.
• Writerbuckeye

  

  I was wondering why I had this feeling of deja vu today -- and then realized I was experiencing a 1990s flashback where The Game is concerned.
  
  I foolishly went into so many of those games (at least early on) with hopes of victory, only to see teams that had played with machine-like efficiency just weeks earlier, freeze up or break down when it came time for the fast track.
  
  While age has increased my skepticism in many things, including sports, I just don't see much chance for Ohio State to win this game tomorrow.
  
  I dearly hope the OSU players and this coaching staff prove me wrong.
  
  In either case (win or loss), the after effects will be very short lived as the focus turns to beginning a new era for Ohio State football.
• Speedofsand

  

  sper
• vball10set

  LJ;986518 wrote:I understand that you are whining about it. I also need you to understand that I don't give a ****.

  I also need you to understand that giving negative reps on a message board will not help you to overcome your Napoleon Complex :thumbup:
• LJ

  

  vball10set;986583 wrote:I also need you to understand that giving negative reps on a message board will not help you to overcome your Napoleon Complex :thumbup:

  I'm not the one crying about getting negative reps
• vball10set

  LJ;986586 wrote:I'm not the one crying about getting negative reps

  the negative reps are the least of what I'm "crying" about--it's the childish reason you gave for doing it
• ts1227

  

  I'm going to neg both of you just because I fucking can
• LJ

  

  It's not my problem that you can't handle me voicing my displeasure over a series of posts you made.
• LJ

  

  ts1227;986590 wrote:I'm going to neg both of you just because I fucking can

  
  Go for it
  
  When the reps started I told Justin to put me way negative to begin with and he never did.
• vball10set

  LJ;986592 wrote:It's not my problem that you can't handle me voicing my displeasure over a series of posts you made.

  I can handle it just fine, but the fact that you can't (knowing that I can't neg rep you) shows your mettle...just sayin'
• vball10set

  LJ;986593 wrote:Go for it
  
  When the reps started I told Justin to put me way negative to begin with and he never did.

  oh, the irony
• LJ

  

  vball10set;986594 wrote:I can handle it just fine, but the fact that you can't (knowing that I can't neg rep you) shows your mettle...just sayin'

  I wouldn't care if you could and then negative repped me 100 times. What is it you don't get me not caring what you think, yet you continue to whine about it?
• vball10set

  LJ;986596 wrote:I wouldn't care if you could and then negative repped me 100 times. What is it you don't get me not caring what you think, yet you continue to whine about it?

  What is it that makes you continue to respond to my posts, being that you don't care?
• LJ

  

  vball10set;986597 wrote:What is it that makes you continue to respond to my posts, being that you don't care?

  Boredom and the hilarity of you continuing to cry about losing rep points
• vball10set

  LJ;986601 wrote:Boredom and the hilarity of you continuing to cry about losing rep points

  
• LJ

  

  cute picture of yourself.