Archive

Sparty wins on a Hail Mary!

  • karen lotz
    The bcs is imploding. Oklahoma its getting beat down
  • dwccrew
    karen lotz;941956 wrote:The bcs is imploding. Oklahoma its getting beat down
    I like that there is finally some upsets. I feel like there haven't been very many this season.
  • jordo212000
    dwccrew;941957 wrote: I feel like there haven't been very many this season.

    Exactly what I said earlier to one of friends
  • killer_ewok
    Incredible.
  • krambman
    karen lotz;941956 wrote:The bcs is imploding. Oklahoma its getting beat down
    Umm, I think that you're confused. All of these teams winning out would have been the BCS imploding. Having teams that are undefeated this late in the season lose is a good thing for the BCS.
  • karen lotz
    Sorry, the teams near the top the bcs are imploding.
  • krambman
    karen lotz;942006 wrote:Sorry, the teams near the top the bcs are imploding.
    That's better.
  • Mulva
    krambman;942004 wrote:Umm, I think that you're confused. All of these teams winning out would have been the BCS imploding. Having teams that are undefeated this late in the season lose is a good thing for the BCS.
    It depends who loses in my opinion. A great anti-BCS scenario would be something like Clemson, Boise State, and Stanford going undefeated with an SEC and Big 12 team each having 1 loss. Then what?
  • krambman
    Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
  • krambman
    Mulva;942009 wrote:It depends who loses in my opinion. A great anti-BCS scenario would be something like Clemson, Boise State, and Stanford going undefeated with an SEC and Big 12 team each having 1 loss. Then what?
    Then the two highest ranked teams in the BCS (likely the SEC and Big XII teams) still play in the title game. People would complain (especially Clemson and Stanford), but the two teams ranked at the top would still face each other in the title game.
  • karen lotz
    krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.

    Is this directed at me? I can't merge threads, I think I started this one before the other one bc I was on my phone. You are awfully testy tonight.
  • Mulva
    ^ Which would have the BCS imploding in my opinion. I don't think teams losing is necessarily a bad thing for anyone who is hoping to mess up the system, as long as the right teams are losing.
  • SportsAndLady
    krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
    lol u mad?
  • jordo212000
    krambman;942011 wrote:Then the two highest ranked teams in the BCS (likely the SEC and Big XII teams) still play in the title game. People would complain (especially Clemson and Stanford), but the two teams ranked at the top would still face each other in the title game.
    If a 1-loss SEC or Big 12 team gets in over an undefeated Clemson, the system is broken. Clemson had a decent OOC schedule and the ACC isn't bad to the point that you should penalize them.

    With all that being said though, Clemson will not go unbeaten IMO
  • SportsAndLady
    The BCS is strategically designed to put the two best teams in the title game...if it claims a 1loss team deserves it over an undefeated team, then so be it.
  • bigorangebuck22
    MSU reminds me of OSU in '02... average offense, much better defense, and a holy buckeye/holy spartan moment
  • SportsAndLady
    bigorangebuck22;942140 wrote:MSU reminds me of OSU in '02... average offense, much better defense, and a holy buckeye/holy spartan moment
    ...but they have a loss

    Soooo....
  • sleeper
    B1G football. Best in the country.
  • ts1227
    krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.

    I merged them last night because all 3 were about the same thing. The merged thread takes the name of the first one created unless you tell it differently. someone has since edited the title, though.
  • Fly4Fun
    I edited to the title something a bit more descriptive.
  • karen lotz
    Again, my deepest apologies to anyone who was offended by the title of the thread last night. I posted from my phone right after the play occurred, before the review overturned the call. I hope you are able to recover mentally from such an egregious error.
  • wes_mantooth
    karen lotz;942221 wrote:Again, my deepest apologies to anyone who was offended by the title of the thread last night. I posted from my phone right after the play occurred, before the review overturned the call. I hope you are able to recover mentally from such an egregious error.

    You die! You die and you go to hell!
  • justincredible
    krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.

    This is an awesome thing to complain about.
  • DeyDurkie5
    krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
    also, go fuck yourself
  • SportsAndLady
    Lol the more you read that post the more hilarious it gets..."with a more interesting thread title" LOL like he sat there and goes "hmm this is one interesting thread ti--WHAT THE FUCK WHO MOVED THAT INTERESTING THREAD TITLE??!!!"