Big Ten Names Divisions "Leaders" and "Legends," Reveals New Logo
-
Manhattan BuckeyeCinciX12;599308 wrote:Those division names are going to be met with 95% criticism. It really is hard to believe that if they did a sample poll of public opinion those polled very well.
What is harder to believe is that a PR firm got paid hundreds of thousands (if not millions) to come up with it. Did they do any market research? These names suck. -
thedynasty1998Still awaiting the Big 10 to come out with the real logo and names of conferences.
I don't think this could have been handled any worse. -
hoops23The logo is fine with me, as is the trophies/awards..
The division names suck though. -
krambmanOneBuckeye;599245 wrote:I agree, just keep it simple. Someone spent way too much time thinking of a theme and building everything around it and blah blah blah. They probably spend 20 million on some marketing company to come up with all that crap.
I don't know how much they spent but Delany did keep mentioning the firm that developed the new logo, but I can't remember their name. They should have hired the same company that developed the new Pac-10/Pac-12 logo that allows it to be done with each school's colors and includes the mountains for the new members that aren't really Pacific. -
RedRider1From Mich St. player Justin Sucher's Twitter.
http://twitter.com/#!/jsucher/status/14372331606507523
-
OneBuckeyeRedRider1;599346 wrote:From Mich St. player Justin Sucher's Twitter.
http://twitter.com/#!/jsucher/status/14372331606507523
I like that better! -
OneBuckeyekrambman;599342 wrote:I don't know how much they spent but Delany did keep mentioning the firm that developed the new logo, but I can't remember their name. They should have hired the same company that developed the new Pac-10/Pac-12 logo that allows it to be done with each school's colors and includes the mountains for the new members that aren't really Pacific.
I agree, take the same concecpt and put a plowed field in the middle instead of a mountain. That would have been better. Anything would have been better. -
Manhattan BuckeyeRedRider1;599346 wrote:From Mich St. player Justin Sucher's Twitter.
http://twitter.com/#!/jsucher/status/14372331606507523
That is hilarious!
Seriously, Delaney should be axed. How can someone with such poor judgment hold such a high position? We're in a get better or get out world, and this isn't only not getting better, it is flat out terrible. -
ICEMAN59This is embarrassing . . . . what a freaking joke.
Epic fail, Big Ten.
Seriously, is this real? -
Manhattan Buckeye
Unfortunately, yes. ESPN has the story on their front page. Unreal.ICEMAN59;599359 wrote:This is embarrassing . . . . what a freaking joke.
Epic fail, Big Ten.
Seriously, is this real? -
se-alumNow I know how Texas fans felt when they had to deal w/ the whole statue fiasco. This is basically an embarassment to the Big Ten. I can handle everything except the division names, although they limited themselves to names like that when they split the divisions like they did.
-
gorocks99The new Media Guide has been released:
-
Manhattan BuckeyeI don't know where you got that gorocks, but damn! That is funny!
-
dat dudeI must be the only Buckeye fan that is completely indifferent to the division names. A year from now (maybe less), nobody will care.
-
FatHobbitthedynasty1998;599325 wrote:I don't think this could have been handled any worse.
they could have called it the decision. -
elbuckeye28I don't mind the names of the trophies and awards, but the division names are horrible. I hope the conference listens to the backlash and decides to change the name to something else.
-
dazedconfusedso this was pretty much a televised abortion all the way around
-
BigAppleBuckeyeWhile the Division names do indeed SUCK, I can live with them. But what's up with that logo? Did a middle school artist win a contest? Come on Big 10! Pitiful
-
j_crazy
remember this?
hopefully the public bashing will cause a similar result. -
BigAppleBuckeyeEven this would have been better:
-
purple_reinI like the logos.
Trophy names are cool, would rather see just one name, but I can live with it.
Leaders & Legends is dumb. They have been overthinking things from the beginning. Should have just split it East/West. -
Manhattan Buckeye"Should have just split it East/West. "
Or Lakes and Plains (as any person with an IQ above 10 living in the midwest suggested). Or anything else remotely relevant.
Leaders & Legends? How about Dungeons & Dragons? Makes about as much sense. Delany should be fired. Now. -
Manhattan Buckeye
LOL, well with the information age perhaps we can, I was thinking more of:j_crazy;599477 wrote:
remember this?
hopefully the public bashing will cause a similar result.
-
vball10setwow--this is bad...I've read every post while trying to make sense of it--it ain't working.
-
krambmanManhattan Buckeye;599503 wrote:LOL, well with the information age perhaps we can, I was thinking more of:
The difference with New Coke is that they tested it extensively in blind taste tests and the new flavor overwhelmingly beat out the old flavor. The marketing was just done poorly. That just proved that the brand name was more powerful than the actual product because people were upset about the change even though they liked the new flavor better. The new Big Ten logo is pretty bad though. Honestly I think I would have liked it better had they used a darker blue color and a more traditions varsity block font.
I do like how all 13 past, present, and future Big Ten teams are represented in the names of the Big Ten trophies. I also like that Ohio State has the most trophies named after their players/coaches with five (six if you count OSU alumnus Bo Schembechler).