Archive

The NEW Big Ten

  • wildcats20
    So it's official, the divisions are out....

    1st Division:
    Michigan
    Nebraska
    Sparty
    Minnesota
    Northwestern
    Iowa

    2nd Division:
    Ohio State
    Wisconsin
    Illinois
    Purdue
    Indiana
    Penn St.

    Maybe it's just me, but the "2nd Division" is a MUCH, MUCH better basketball draw than the "1st Division."
  • FatHobbit
    wildcats20;468255 wrote:So it's official, the divisions are out....

    1st Division:
    Michigan
    Nebraska
    Sparty
    Minnesota
    Northwestern
    Iowa

    2nd Division:
    Ohio State
    Wisconsin
    Illinois
    Purdue
    Indiana
    Penn St.

    Maybe it's just me, but the "2nd Division" is a MUCH, MUCH better basketball draw than the "1st Division."

    Better for who? :)
  • killdeer
    will the divisions achieve names?
  • Laley23
    Is this official for basketball as well or just football. Frankly, if thats the divisions for basketball its a joke. Michigan State will walk to the #1 seed every year.
  • lhslep134
    How ignorant are people on here?

    There are no divisions for basketball. Ken Gordon and Tim May have driven this point home like 20 times through articles and twitter. All divisions are strictly used for football.


    The only thing they could possibly use divisions for in basketball is for scheduling, not for anything competitively though.

    In the ACC, they have each team has 2 permanent (protected) home and away series, and then have a rotating 9 team schedule.
  • OneBuckeye
    I hope they don't use these divisions or divisions at all for basketball...
  • wildcats20
    lhslep134;468465 wrote:There are no divisions for basketball. Ken Gordon and Tim May have driven this point home like 20 times through articles and twitter. All divisions are strictly used for football.


    The only thing they could possibly use divisions for in basketball is for scheduling, not for anything competitively though.

    That would make divisions in basketball......

    They will play 2 games against every team in their division and 1 game against each team from the other division.
  • centralbucksfan
    lhslep134;468465 wrote:How ignorant are people on here?

    There are no divisions for basketball. Ken Gordon and Tim May have driven this point home like 20 times through articles and twitter. All divisions are strictly used for football.


    The only thing they could possibly use divisions for in basketball is for scheduling, not for anything competitively though.

    In the ACC, they have each team has 2 permanent (protected) home and away series, and then have a rotating 9 team schedule.

    Agree...I have heard nor read anything at all about basketball being split. I don't believe this football split has anything to do with bball.
  • centralbucksfan
    wildcats20;468255 wrote:So it's official, the divisions are out....

    1st Division:
    Michigan
    Nebraska
    Sparty
    Minnesota
    Northwestern
    Iowa

    2nd Division:
    Ohio State
    Wisconsin
    Illinois
    Purdue
    Indiana
    Penn St.

    Maybe it's just me, but the "2nd Division" is a MUCH, MUCH better basketball draw than the "1st Division."

    Actually, its NOT OFFICIAL as they aren't even going to announce the alignment until 7pm tonite. Not sure where you got this. But nothing is even out at this point. Not for another 15 min. And again, this is about football and doesnt' pertain to basketball.
  • wildcats20
    In men's basketball, according to sources, the Big Ten could play a 16-game conference schedule by taking a model similar to those used by the Big 12 and Southeastern conferences. In those leagues, teams play each division opponent twice and then single games -- three at home and three on the road -- against teams in the opposing division.
    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5519832

    So yes, it's not OFFICIAL, but it's "official".
  • wildcats20
    You are not going to see 2 different alignments for basketball and football.

    Yes, bringing a 12th team IS a football move, but it will affect ALL the sports.
  • wildcats20
    And now Delaney is shooting down all of those "sources".

    Saying it will be up to the coaches and schools to figure out if they need divisions.
  • centralbucksfan
    wildcats20;468631 wrote:You are not going to see 2 different alignments for basketball and football.

    Yes, bringing a 12th team IS a football move, but it will affect ALL the sports.

    Well obviously it will affect other sports. But there has been no mention of splitting other sports into divisions. Thats the point. Obviously it will affect scheduling with the addition of Nebraska. But with basketball, its not that difficult of a task with the number of games available to play.
  • lhslep134
    wildcats20;468631 wrote:You are not going to see 2 different alignments for basketball and football.

    Yes, bringing a 12th team IS a football move, but it will affect ALL the sports.

    Like I said, no it doesn't.


    It only affects scheduling.

    It doesn't affect who plays for conference title, or anything like that.
  • CinciX12
    All adding Nebraska to the schedule will do is inhibit OSU's ability to schedule 2 other pathetic OOC opponents.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    centralbucksfan;468625 wrote:Actually, its NOT OFFICIAL as they aren't even going to announce the alignment until 7pm tonite. Not sure where you got this. But nothing is even out at this point. Not for another 15 min. And again, this is about football and doesnt' pertain to basketball.

    Yeah, SEC is/was the only "power" conference to keep divisions in basketball. ACC didn't. The old Big 12 didn't either when it came to tournament seeding. I'm not sure why the new Big 10 would feel compelled to, especially since the divisions were made with football in mind.

    It would blow if OSU didn't play Michigan home and home every year in basketball. I hope the Big 10 follows the ACC's format - guarantee home and homes for some opponents....just because OSU and Michigan were placed in separate divisions in football shouldn't mean they lose the basketball home and home.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Here's the ACC format, two protected home and homes, the other 9 opponents rotate (3 home and homes, 3 road, 3 home)...this is a FAR better system for the Big 10 since it was split up with football (and not basketball or geography) in mind. Here are the ACC's protected partners:

    School Partner 1 Partner 2
    Boston College Miami Virginia Tech
    Clemson Georgia Tech Florida State
    Duke North Carolina Maryland
    Florida State Miami Clemson
    Georgia Tech Clemson Wake Forest
    Maryland Duke Virginia
    Miami Boston College Florida State
    North Carolina Duke North Carolina State
    North Carolina State North Carolina Wake Forest
    Virginia Virginia Tech Maryland
    Virginia Tech Virginia Boston College
    Wake Forest North Carolina State Georgia Tech

    I can see the following Big 10 scheme with the ACC format.

    School Partner 1 Partner 2
    Indiana Ohio St. Purdue
    Illinois Mich. St. Northwestern
    Iowa Nebraska Wisconsin
    Minn. Nebraska Wisconsin
    Michigan Mich. St. Ohio St.
    Mich. St. Illinois Michigan
    Nebraska Iowa Minnesota
    NW Illinois Penn St.
    Ohio St. Indiana Michigan
    Penn St. NW Purdue
    Purdue Indiana Penn St.
    Wisky Iowa Minnesota
  • lhslep134
    Manhattan Buckeye;470499 wrote:Here's the ACC format, two protected home and homes, the other 9 opponents rotate (3 home and homes, 3 road, 3 home)...this is a FAR better system for the Big 10 since it was split up with football (and not basketball or geography) in mind. Here are the ACC's protected partners:

    School Partner 1 Partner 2
    Boston College Miami Virginia Tech
    Clemson Georgia Tech Florida State
    Duke North Carolina Maryland
    Florida State Miami Clemson
    Georgia Tech Clemson Wake Forest
    Maryland Duke Virginia
    Miami Boston College Florida State
    North Carolina Duke North Carolina State
    North Carolina State North Carolina Wake Forest
    Virginia Virginia Tech Maryland
    Virginia Tech Virginia Boston College
    Wake Forest North Carolina State Georgia Tech

    I can see the following Big 10 scheme with the ACC format.

    School Partner 1 Partner 2
    Indiana Ohio St. Purdue
    Illinois Mich. St. Northwestern
    Iowa Nebraska Wisconsin
    Minn. Nebraska Wisconsin
    Michigan Mich. St. Ohio St.
    Mich. St. Illinois Michigan
    Nebraska Iowa Minnesota
    NW Illinois Penn St.
    Ohio St. Indiana Michigan
    Penn St. NW Purdue
    Purdue Indiana Penn St.
    Wisky Iowa Minnesota



    I already said this earlier about the ACC if you would have read my post.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    yes I read it, I was just providing the actual format in the ACC (which works well) and how a similar Big 10 format could work. Certainly much better than an SEC-like divisional structure with divisions based on football.
  • lhslep134
    Manhattan Buckeye;470646 wrote:yes I read it, I was just providing the actual format in the ACC (which works well) and how a similar Big 10 format could work. Certainly much better than an SEC-like divisional structure with divisions based on football.

    Just giving you a hard time man, I like your post, I think it would work really well.
  • Writerbuckeye
    Manhattan Buckeye;470440 wrote:Yeah, SEC is/was the only "power" conference to keep divisions in basketball. ACC didn't. The old Big 12 didn't either when it came to tournament seeding. I'm not sure why the new Big 10 would feel compelled to, especially since the divisions were made with football in mind.

    It would blow if OSU didn't play Michigan home and home every year in basketball. I hope the Big 10 follows the ACC's format - guarantee home and homes for some opponents....just because OSU and Michigan were placed in separate divisions in football shouldn't mean they lose the basketball home and home.

    Under the current setup OSU isn't guaranteed a home and home with UM every year. If I'm not mistaken, the schedule rotates and at some point, every team plays only one game against the other for two years in a row (one home, one away). I don't recall reading about any protected rivalries in basketball -- only football.

    EDIT: Just checked, it's as I thought. In 1999-2000, Ohio State only played UM there. The following season, they only played UM at home. I would assume this kind of scheduling will continue.