Archive

Who should NOT be a moderator?

  • justincredible
    And he was given an "official" warning.
  • Commander of Awesome
    justincredible;1172837 wrote:Also, I am definitely up for using the community to HELP pick the next moderator. It wouldn't be something that I'd just let you guys put together, vote, and pick the next guy. But I would take nominations from everyone, narrow that list down myself, and then let you guys vote and take the top 1 or 2 vote getters as mods.
    Do you think we need a new mod? I'm not sure that's the answer.
  • justincredible
    Commander of Awesome;1172855 wrote:Do you think we need a new mod? I'm not sure that's the answer.
    Depends on the question, I guess.
  • ernest_t_bass
    Raw Dawgin' it;1172845 wrote:I got a warning and skyhook got a warning (according to wildcats posts) but wildcats did the same thing as both of us and isn't banned....interesting.
    LOL. You're such a hypocrite. Calling me a whiner, then posting this QQ post.
  • justincredible
    justincredible;1172853 wrote:He did the same thing as you and you want him banned? When all you got was a warning (and not even an official warning, just a PM saying knock it off)?
    I see you got an actual warning today. Either way, so did he. And you're not "banned" either.
  • ernest_t_bass
    Commander of Awesome;1172855 wrote:Do you think we need a new mod? I'm not sure that's the answer.
    I'm with this guy on this one. Don't think we need another one, unless it's the All PWN team. Their job will be to follow snot bubbles around and infract every single post of his.
  • Commander of Awesome
    ernest_t_bass;1172860 wrote:I'm with this guy on this one. Don't think we need another one, unless it's the All PWN team. Their job will be to follow snot bubbles around and infract every single post of his.
    We would?
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1172855 wrote:Do you think we need a new mod? I'm not sure that's the answer.

    We need demotions and promotions.
  • justincredible
    I tell you what, how about I just wipe out the entire moderating staff and allow you guys to police yourselves? I'll use a voting system like I've seen in comments sections of different websites that just delete comments with a low score. That sounds like an awesome idea!
  • ernest_t_bass
    Commander of Awesome;1172862 wrote:We would?
    Hopefully!
  • ernest_t_bass
    justincredible;1172867 wrote:I tell you what, how about I just wipe out the entire moderating staff and allow you guys to police yourselves? I'll use a voting system like I've seen in comments sections of different websites that just delete comments with a low score. That sounds like an awesome idea!
    Sounds like a pain in the ass.

    Just make sleeper a moderator already. Seriously, though. Let's see if he's truly full of shit, or not.
  • like_that
    justincredible;1172867 wrote:I tell you what, how about I just wipe out the entire moderating staff and allow you guys to police yourselves? I'll use a voting system like I've seen in comments sections of different websites that just delete comments with a low score. That sounds like an awesome idea!

    Can the votes from the QQers be worth less points than us thick skinned posters?
  • ernest_t_bass
    like_that;1172873 wrote:Can the votes from the QQers be worth less points than us thick skinned posters?
    QQ'ing is in the eye of the beholder. Many people could/would think that some of the things the All PWN team type are full of QQ's.
  • justincredible
    like_that;1172873 wrote:Can the votes from the QQers be worth less points than us thick skinned posters?
    Who determines that? I'll let you decide.
  • Commander of Awesome
    justincredible;1172867 wrote:I tell you what, how about I just wipe out the entire moderating staff and allow you guys to police yourselves? I'll use a voting system like I've seen in comments sections of different websites that just delete comments with a low score. That sounds like an awesome idea!
    Sounds horrible. Sounds like you guys are on the same page, which definitely wasn't the case in the past. My biggest issue with the mods (aka Cry4Fail) is I would post in the thread that you, Wes, Heretic posted in after the fact with no issue. Then Cry4Fail comes along and low and behold, Infraction!!! He would also infract a post a day+ after the fact. That was bs. Consistency is the key and a new mod isn't going to help/change that. A post worthy of an infraction should be on the same grading scale across the board. Sounds like you guys are on the same page now and I think that's a good thing.
  • Curly J
    I think we need heavy handed mods like over at vaJJ's. The type that just delete posts and ban you for no reason. Well no reason but for thinking you are dlazz. That will make this site legitimate, ya think??? ;)
  • BR1986FB
    Commander of Awesome;1172881 wrote:Sounds horrible. Sounds like you guys are on the same page, which definitely wasn't the case in the past. My biggest issue with the mods (aka Cry4Fail) is I would post in the thread that you, Wes, Heretic posted in after the fact with no issue. Then Cry4Fail comes along and low and behold, Infraction!!! He would also infract a post a day+ after the fact. That was bs. Consistency is the key and a new mod isn't going to help/change that. A post worthy of an infraction should be on the same grading scale across the board. Sounds like you guys are on the same page now and I think that's a good thing.
    Common jackass sense should determine whether a post is worthy of an infraction.
  • ernest_t_bass
    I just received an infraction for asking snot if he would like "a tangible cock shoved down his throat." I give SE-Alum credit for infracting, b/c it was deserving. :)
  • Commander of Awesome
    ernest_t_bass;1172890 wrote:I just received an infraction for asking snot if he would like "a tangible cock shoved down his throat." I give SE-Alum credit for infracting, b/c it was deserving. :)
    There's already a thread for this, please post it there as well.
  • ernest_t_bass
    Commander of Awesome;1172881 wrote:Sounds horrible. Sounds like you guys are on the same page, which definitely wasn't the case in the past. My biggest issue with the mods (aka Cry4Fail) is I would post in the thread that you, Wes, Heretic posted in after the fact with no issue. Then Cry4Fail comes along and low and behold, Infraction!!! He would also infract a post a day+ after the fact. That was bs. Consistency is the key and a new mod isn't going to help/change that. A post worthy of an infraction should be on the same grading scale across the board. Sounds like you guys are on the same page now and I think that's a good thing.

    This just happened to me. The above post of mine tells of an infraction I got from se_alum, but Justin was posting in that thread, and didn't infract. I was surprised he didn't :)

    Once I wrote the post, I realized it wasn't in the basement, and figured it would get infracted. I think Snot is still contemplating, b/c he never responded to it.
  • ernest_t_bass
    Commander of Awesome;1172893 wrote:There's already a thread for this, please post it there as well.
    I did, then I copy pasta'd it here. Keep up.
  • justincredible
    ernest_t_bass;1172896 wrote:This just happened to me. The above post of mine tells of an infraction I got from se_alum, but Justin was posting in that thread, and didn't infract. I was surprised he didn't :)

    Once I wrote the post, I realized it wasn't in the basement, and figured it would get infracted. I think Snot is still contemplating, b/c he never responded to it.
    I didn't see the post until after the warning was given.
  • ernest_t_bass
    justincredible;1172898 wrote:I didn't see the post until after the warning was given.
    Then you lol'd.
  • justincredible
    ernest_t_bass;1172899 wrote:Then you lol'd.
  • ernest_t_bass