Banned Spider-man Trailer
-
MANAZEI worked at Blockbuster when 9/11 happened. The next Tuesday (New Release Day) there was a recall for a movie because of this trailer.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Pretty crazy. -
AppleIf I was in charge I would have pulled it. Given the emotion of 9/11 and with respect to the thousands of people who died in those buildings, I can see perfectly why the movie was recalled.
-
KnightXC1There was a story on this before the movie came out with the picture in USAToday I believe. Was the right thing to do.
-
j_crazyno problem with it getting yanked.
i'm still numb when i think about that day. when i went to ground zero.... i can't explain how terrible i felt. it's the reason i want to live in NYC to see that place, that devastation and how they overcame it. amazing. -
DeyDurkie5I mean, it's not like it crashed into it..I don't see anything to bad with it
-
GoChiefs
Maybe b/c 2,976 lives were lost in those same very towers, just 7 days earlier, in the worst terrorist attack on our country?DeyDurkie5 wrote: I don't see anything to bad with it -
tcarrier32
were those lives causes by this movie? no they werent. the other dozens of movies that feature the world trade center towers were not recalled.GoChiefs wrote:
Maybe b/c 2,976 lives were lost in those same very towers, just 7 days earlier, in the worst terrorist attack on our country?DeyDurkie5 wrote: I don't see anything to bad with it
im not saying that pulling it was the wrong thing, i just dont see the problem with it not being pulled. -
krambman
Movies like Spiderman are set to take place in the present. By the time this ad was to be released, those towers no longer stood. You can't really have a movie taking place in the present with those towers in it if they no longer exist.tcarrier32 wrote:
were those lives causes by this movie? no they werent. the other dozens of movies that feature the world trade center towers were not recalled.GoChiefs wrote:
Maybe b/c 2,976 lives were lost in those same very towers, just 7 days earlier, in the worst terrorist attack on our country?DeyDurkie5 wrote: I don't see anything to bad with it
im not saying that pulling it was the wrong thing, i just dont see the problem with it not being pulled.
Also, the fact that 9/11 had happened just a week before the ad was to premier would have made it very distasteful to go ahead with it. It's one of those "it's still too soon" moments. If the movie were coming out today and taking place in 2000, then it would probably be an okay ad to run, but it wouldn't have been just 7 days after the towers were struck. -
friendfromlowryThe trailer sucked with or without the Twin Towers in it anyways.
-
MANAZEwell the reason they told us it was being pulled was because it had a helicopter being attached to the two towers and it was to close to the real thing that happened on 9/11.
I was helping out a store when it happened up past pittsburgh a little ways and it was close to the airport and the whole way there you could see planes all the time and then driving up on 9/11 it was weird because there was no plains at all. -
GoChiefs
No..but at least the movie makers were smart enough to realize the emotion in America at that time. Had that trailer been released at that time..regardless of whether you see anything wrong with it or not..you know as well as I do that there would have been a HUGE uproar about it. And not in a positive way.tcarrier32 wrote: were those lives causes by this movie? no they werent. the other dozens of movies that feature the world trade center towers were not recalled.
im not saying that pulling it was the wrong thing, i just dont see the problem with it not being pulled. -
ZombieKillerI've seen this trailer in the theaters. I can't remember if it was before or after 9/11.