Archive

thread not accepted

  • Big_Mirg_ZHS
    Keebler wrote:
    Belly35 wrote:
    assumption wrote: Started 2 threads in the politics section. Neither was accepted. Who can explain this. Did not call anyone out or use improper language. It concerned political adds. Really kinda ticks me off if the reason the threads were banned was because of my beliefs. If in fact that is the reason................shame on the FREE huddle!
    Check your grammar...
    Pot meet kettle.
    This made me LOLz
  • assumption
    Keebler and Go Chiefs; or is it frick and frack. I'm well satisfied with the explanation I received from more civil posters. Won't bother your feeble minds again.
  • GoChiefs
    assumption wrote: Keebler and Go Chiefs; or is it frick and frack. I'm well satisfied with the explanation I received from more civil posters. Won't bother your feeble minds again.
    Did you really just say that after starting a thread like this? LOL If you didn't want an answer..you obviously shouldn't have asked right?
  • Con_Alma
    assumption wrote: ... Won't bother your feeble minds again.
    Promise??
  • GoChiefs
    LMAO..I see assumption started a thread about us on the other place! :)

    "How many have checked out the free huddle. Hard to beleive thats going to last long. Shoud call it the FREE PORN huddle. Lots of very filthy posts. Even garbage user-names. I asked a legitimate question and got bombarded with all forms of insults. Some from moderators."
  • Squirmydog
    Moderators do a thankless job. [/quote]Thanks Mods!!!
  • coyotes22
    GoChiefs wrote: LMAO..I see assumption started a thread about us on the other place! :)

    "How many have checked out the free huddle. Hard to beleive thats going to last long. Shoud call it the FREE PORN huddle. Lots of very filthy posts. Even garbage user-names. I asked a legitimate question and got bombarded with all forms of insults. Some from moderators."
    TRAITOR!!!!!!!!!!

    You should have your mod status removed for even THINKING of going there!!!!!!



    :D
  • j_crazy
    where is the free porn? how have i missed this?
  • Heretic
    GoChiefs wrote: LMAO..I see assumption started a thread about us on the other place! :)

    "How many have checked out the free huddle. Hard to beleive thats going to last long. Shoud call it the FREE PORN huddle. Lots of very filthy posts. Even garbage user-names. I asked a legitimate question and got bombarded with all forms of insults. Some from moderators."
    Man, poor chap has to really feel ostracized if he posted that there, considering the long-standing JJ policy of "YOU BETTER NEVER MENTION ANY SIMILAR BOARD ON THIS SITE YOU STUPID PEASANTS!!!!!" (unwritten rule 431.2b)

    Hopefully for his sake, that post was only deleted and he wasn't banned into eternity for daring to mention this site. Although it might be for the best if he was. If he went into that sort of overreacting hysteria over the responses he got on this thread, he probably isn't emotionally suited for message boards.
  • GoChiefs
    Yes..indeed it was deleted. LOL
  • assumption
    Heretic wrote:
    GoChiefs wrote: LMAO..I see assumption started a thread about us on the other place! :)

    "How many have checked out the free huddle. Hard to beleive thats going to last long. Shoud call it the FREE PORN huddle. Lots of very filthy posts. Even garbage user-names. I asked a legitimate question and got bombarded with all forms of insults. Some from moderators."
    Man, poor chap has to really feel ostracized if he posted that there, considering the long-standing JJ policy of "YOU BETTER NEVER MENTION ANY SIMILAR BOARD ON THIS SITE YOU STUPID PEASANTS!!!!!" (unwritten rule 431.2b)

    Hopefully for his sake, that post was only deleted and he wasn't banned into eternity for daring to mention this site. Although it might be for the best if he was. If he went into that sort of overreacting hysteria over the responses he got on this thread, he probably isn't emotionally suited for message boards.
    Your concern for my emotional status , while appreciated
    isn't necessary. The thread had not been deleted as of yesterday. As far as "overreacting" it is possible the replys were in the category as well.
  • FatHobbit
    assumption wrote: Your concern for my emotional status , while appreciated
    isn't necessary. The thread had not been deleted as of yesterday. As far as "overreacting" it is possible the replys were in the category as well.
    Who can explain this?
  • Fab1b
    Dude are you that sensative you can't take a ribbing on a message board?
  • Heretic
    Fab1b wrote: Dude are you that sensative you can't take a ribbing on a message board?
  • ytownfootball
    I have assumptions about assumption.
  • Fab1b
    Classic
  • assumption
    Happy to tell all ITS BEEN DELETED!!!
  • coyotes22
    Heretic wrote:

    Man, poor chap has to really feel ostracized if he posted that there, considering the long-standing JJ policy of "YOU BETTER NEVER MENTION ANY SIMILAR BOARD ON THIS SITE YOU STUPID PEASANTS!!!!!" (unwritten rule 431.2b)

    Hopefully for his sake, that post was only deleted and he wasn't banned into eternity for daring to mention this site. Although it might be for the best if he was. If he went into that sort of overreacting hysteria over the responses he got on this thread, he probably isn't emotionally suited for message boards.
    Your job must be boring!!!!

    :D
  • Heretic
    ^^
    You would be correct. Or at least today is. Some days are quite entertaining and busy. This just doesn't happen to be one of them, to which I say BOOOO-URNS.
  • wes_mantooth
    This has been an interesting read...lol
  • coyotes22
    Heretic wrote: ^^
    [size=xx-large]You would be correct[/size]. Or at least today is. Some days are quite entertaining and busy. This just doesn't happen to be one of them, to which I say BOOOO-URNS.
    Im going to save this, and show the wife.

    She is always telling me how wrong I am,,,,,, HAHA IN HER FACE!!!!!!!

    :D