Archive

Who's Now 2010 - FreeHuddle Edition

  • Fly4Fun
    Trueblue23 wrote: Fly just ignore it if you don't like it man.
    Just voicing my opinion as I always do... what's the point of a message board if people are always going to agree with each other?
  • Tiger2003
    LJ wrote: please remove me
    WHY...
  • LJ
    Tiger2003 wrote:
    LJ wrote: please remove me
    WHY...
    Because contests like these are stupid and I have always refused to participate in them.
  • BigAppleBuckeye
    Damn, I'm a 10-seed??! Didn't I make the Final 4 in last year's Huddle NCAA Tourney? haha, wow I must have lost a shitload of players to the NBA!
  • ts1227
    At least LJ isn't pulling an NL CR FAN and having the contests abolished!
  • SnotBubbles
    Fly4Fun wrote: I think you're an attention whore who constantly needs to be validated and you operate under the guise of trying to be edgy... capisce?
    This is a message board. Everyone who posts on it is an attention whore. I have no guise. My personality is based on humor. That entire quality of me is forthright and honest. If you're offended, if you think it's lame...that's your opinion. I have a difference of opinion and don't care for several personalities on here...however, I never attack someone for how they act unless I'm attacked. To me, that's rude, ignorant and childish (more so than my non-humorous sense of humor).

    I can run away from this site. I'm on other sites that are much larger. However, I like the people on this one...so I use it the most. I think of most people on this site as people I consider "friends" on a day-to-day basis. I have no reason to validate anything. This is an online forum, I take it as such.
  • Trueblue23
    Fly4Fun wrote:
    Trueblue23 wrote: Fly just ignore it if you don't like it man.
    Just voicing my opinion as I always do... what's the point of a message board if people are always going to agree with each other?
    You can certainly have your opinion bro, but if you don't like this thread just stay away.. You don't walk into K-mart and talk about how terrible it is do ya? Well, I wouldn't put it past you!! hah
  • Curly J
    LJ wrote:
    Tiger2003 wrote:
    LJ wrote: please remove me
    WHY...
    Because contests like these are stupid and I have always refused to participate in them.
    Come on LJ, Don't go all 'Peggy' on us. :D
  • SnotBubbles
    Tiger2003 wrote:
    SnotBubbles wrote:
    3 SnotBubbles
    14 Tiger2003



    ****A play-in game will be held for the four (4) #16 seeds. If you want to be in that poll, list your name below. First 10 to say they are in, are in.
    What are my odds of pulling the upset....
    Haha...I think they're pretty good man. I wanted to leave my opponent blank, just so I could "squeak" out of the first round. :)
  • LJ
    I don't care if you guys do them. I've spoken my peace and would like my name removed.
  • SnotBubbles
    LJ wrote: I don't care if you guys do them. I've spoken my peace and would like my name removed.
    Understand and your will has been done.
  • Nate
    SnotBubbles wrote: Keebler...with 1,361 posts...i don't understand how you didn't make the Top 50 on FFT's list.

    I really only hand picked 14 huddlers and most of those were the one's on FFT's thread wondering why they didn't make it. We'll do a play-in game for four 16 seeds. I'll revise this.

    Post here if you want in on the play-in game.

    I think mainly its because I haven't posted on some of the bigger threads like the Boobs one or some of the stupid count down games.
  • trackandccrunner
    I wanna be in this. I think I could make some noise and pull a george mason haha.
  • Heretic
    Keebler wrote:
    SnotBubbles wrote: Keebler...with 1,361 posts...i don't understand how you didn't make the Top 50 on FFT's list.

    I really only hand picked 14 huddlers and most of those were the one's on FFT's thread wondering why they didn't make it. We'll do a play-in game for four 16 seeds. I'll revise this.

    Post here if you want in on the play-in game.

    I think mainly its because I haven't posted on some of the bigger threads like the Boobs one or some of the stupid count down games.
    FFT's ratings primarily rank people by threads started. Which is why a guy like me, who has an obscene number of posts, but rarely starts threads, was an at-large pick, as opposed to more of a high seed. What you should do is start about 5-10 counting, who's on top, etc. and watch your "status" rise (in the rankings, you'll just receive contempt from me) as they get 100 posts a day.
  • ernest_t_bass
    If no one caught it on the other thread, FFT's rankings were from THREADS ONLY, not posts.
  • ernest_t_bass
    Damn you heretic
  • Curly J
    Keebler wrote:

    I think mainly its because I haven't posted on some of the bigger threads like the Boobs one or some of the stupid count down games.
    I think FFT ratings are based on not so much posting on threads, but starting threads and getting replies and views.


    EDIT:

    Alright Damn you Heretic and Ernest !!!
  • SnotBubbles
    Okay...well then let's hold off until FFT get's some better rankings. Not too many people seem interested anyway.
  • Heretic
    Ha ha. Double-damned! Today is a good day.
  • Fly4Fun
    Trueblue23 wrote:
    Fly4Fun wrote:
    Trueblue23 wrote: Fly just ignore it if you don't like it man.
    Just voicing my opinion as I always do... what's the point of a message board if people are always going to agree with each other?
    You can certainly have your opinion bro, but if you don't like this thread just stay away.. You don't walk into K-mart and talk about how terrible it is do ya? Well, I wouldn't put it past you!! hah
    Ummm, no thanks. It'd be un-American of me to not voice my voice of opposition ;)
  • Trueblue23
    He said he won't do rankings based on posts because there are so many posts.

    Maybe do the field of 64 by having a small group choose them, idk.
  • ernest_t_bass
    Snot, just do it, who cares. I went through with the "most annoying" contest, WAY after it had died down. I think that made me the most annoying, even though I didn't win.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    Someone who wants it can have my spot.
  • SnotBubbles
    Well, the attention whore that I am, I don't want to put that much into it TB23. If you want to take the hand-off, I'll let you take it into the endzone.
  • fan_from_texas
    Heretic wrote: FFT's ratings primarily rank people by threads started. Which is why a guy like me, who has an obscene number of posts, but rarely starts threads, was an at-large pick, as opposed to more of a high seed. What you should do is start about 5-10 counting, who's on top, etc. and watch your "status" rise (in the rankings, you'll just receive contempt from me) as they get 100 posts a day.
    Exactly. My ratings show how much traffic a poster's threads get, period. It doesn't deal with post quality, it doesn't deal with thread quality, it doesn't deal with poster interest, or anything else. It just ranks posters based on how many people view their threads and respond to them. That said, there are diminshing returns for "mega-threads," so a single good thread doesn't get someone up to the top.