Kate Upton Topless GIF

• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  The link is NSFW.
  
  http://www.egotastic.com/2013/06/kate-upton-topless-on-a-horse-gif-live-or-memorex/
  
• vdubb96

  

  ummmmm thanks for making my morning!
• dlazz

  Reported OP
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  dlazz;1462415 wrote:Reported OP

  Sorry this thread doesn't appeal to eunuchs
  
  hope this helps.
• GOONx19

  

  Might as well put the link to Brooklyn Decker on here then, too. NSFW.
  
  [SP]http://www.egotastic.com/photos/brooklyn-decker-topless-yes-son-this-is-heaven/brooklyn-decker-topless-mark-squires-02/full-size/[/SP]
• SnotBubbles

  

  Dinner plate nipples. Would not bang.
• hasbeen

  

  Worth the price of admission
• vdubb96

  

  ccrunner609;1462447 wrote:was I supposed to like KU muffin top also?

  I know right?? Not being able to see every rib and bone in her body is repulsive! Plus she has big boobies!! YUCK!
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  ccrunner609;1462447 wrote:was I supposed to like KU muffin top also?

  Maybe you Dlazz, Said, and Gut can go circle jerk to androgynous women
• Fly4Fun

  

  She's just skinny fat, not something I find particularly attractive but some don't mind. To each their own.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Fly4Fun;1462455 wrote:She's just skinny fat, not something I find particularly attractive but some don't mind. To each their own.

  Please, tell us more about the oxymoron skinny fat!
• Heretic

  

  You know, it's times like this when I wish people like Kate Upton were Ohioans who came to this board all the time. Because with some of the people here, I'd possibly stand a chance for just being all like, "Don't listen to them, babe. You're lookin' fine no matter what they say."
  
  Or probably not, but I CAN STILL DREAM DAMNIT!!!
• SnotBubbles

  

  ccrunner609;1462447 wrote:was I supposed to like KU muffin top also?

  
• dlazz

  Can't read the Chatter at work now because posters feel the need to post this SMUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
• vdubb96

  

  dlazz;1462531 wrote:Can't read the Chatter at work now because posters feel the need to post this SMUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  It's not SMUT, it's ART!
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  dlazz;1462531 wrote:Can't read the Chatter at work now because posters feel the need to post this SMUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  Go jerk off to runners digest, i'm sure that's not blocked.
• dlazz

  Raw Dawgin' it;1462534 wrote:Go jerk off to runners digest, i'm sure that's not blocked.

  
  I never said it was blocked.
  
  Reading is hard.
• Fly4Fun

  

  dlazz;1462536 wrote:I never said it was blocked.
  
  Reading is hard.

  It's only a link, no picture. Not sure what the issue would be then. Enlighten us.
• wildcats20

  

  Fly4Fun;1462539 wrote:It's only a link, no picture. Not sure what the issue would be then. Enlighten us.

  
  The OP did have the actual pic for awhile.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  wildcats20;1462540 wrote:The OP did have the actual pic for awhile.

  I copied and pasted links never copied the picture
  
  hope this help :thumbup:
• wildcats20

  

  Raw Dawgin' it;1462542 wrote:I copied and pasted links never copied the picture
  
  hope this help :thumbup:

  
  The picture is showing up for me on tapatalk.
  
  Hope this helps :thumbup:
• Fly4Fun

  

  wildcats20;1462540 wrote:The OP did have the actual pic for awhile.

  Thanks! I guess that explains it then.
  
  I can't imagine it the time of "a while" being that long as the last edit was only 2 minutes after the original post (7:09-7:11). Are you sure you didn't see a picture on tapatalk?
• Fly4Fun

  

  wildcats20;1462544 wrote:The picture is showing up for me on tapatalk.
  
  Hope this helps :thumbup:

  Ya, that's a tapatalk feature and not a feature of the message board. I'll bring this to Justin's attention, but I'm not sure if something can be done about that.
• like_that

  

  Fly4Fun;1462547 wrote: I'll bring this to Justin's attention, but I'm not sure if something can be done about that.

  Basement response.
  http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?38769-Like_That-s-infractable-posts&p=1462550&viewfull=1#post1462550
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  Fly4Fun;1462545 wrote:Thanks! I guess that explains it then.
  
  I can't imagine it the time of "a while" being that long as the last edit was only 2 minutes after the original post (7:09-7:11). Are you sure you didn't see a picture on tapatalk?

  I edited to add the second link. I'm sure if the picture was posted instead of the link it would've been removed and I would've received a PM with a warning or infraction by now.