Hooker offers sex for cheeseburger off McDonald's Value Menu

• BR1986FB

  LOL...
  
  http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/prostitution/sex-for-cheeseburgers-749801
  
  edit: Dollar Menu
• sleeper

  

  Only in the SEC...
• gut

  You can't pay for sex, but can you barter for sex? What's the law on that?
• Tigerfan00

  

  Sounds like a great deal for Fab1.
• Steel Valley Football

  Ho gotsta eat too.
• Fab1b

  

  It's about time for lunch and sex
• Skyhook79

  

  This is entrapment and why cops get a bad rap in some cases. How can someone turn down not 1 but 2 Double cheeseburgers for a little pleasure? Also this transaction, without a doubt, took place at sleepers McDonald's Franchise that he owns.
• derek bomar

  

  so let me get this straight. Man buys woman dinner. Woman correctly gives sex in exchange for dinner. Women is punished. WTF Amurka?
• justincredible

  

  I need to see a picture of this prostitute.
• Steel Valley Football

  It was Raw Dawgin It's mom. Just check his FB page; I'm sure she's on there. Heard she's freaky deaky for some Taco Bell and you get multiple holes for Burger King.
• chicago510

  

  Must have misread the Craigslist ad of "My pussy wants a cheeseburger".
  
  
  
• chicago510

  

  “I agreed to the deal and purchased the hamburgers for $2.75.”

  The real crime here is that two cheeseburgers off the dollar menu cost $2.75
• Tigerfan00

  

  justincredible;1134427 wrote:I need to see a picture of this prostitute.

  Found it
  
  
• gut

  In addition to the cheeseburgers, the woman told the undercover that he could also give her a tip. In response, the cop handed over $60. The woman kept $40, took the McDonald’s grub, and directed the cop to a vacant Bradenton parking lot “to park in to complete the deal.”
  
  So, the cop gave her $60 but she only took $40 (and the food)? I guess she just couldn't accept $60 in good faith for the services rendered.
• Tiernan

  Dats one Hungry Hungry Hooker.
• baseballstud24

  I got these CHHHHHEEEESSSSEEEEBBBUUURRRGGGEEERRRSSS man...
• Y-Town Steelhound

  

  Seems like entrapment but whatever
• gut

  Y-Town Steelhound;1134508 wrote:Seems like entrapment but whatever

  No, entrapment would be approaching her and offering to pay for sex. He never offers that. When she suggested the tip is when she was busted.
• sjmvsfscs08

  Tigerfan00;1134477 wrote:Found it
  
  

  hahahahahha
• justincredible

  

  Tigerfan00;1134477 wrote:Found it
  
  

  I'd go way higher than 2 double cheeseburgers.
• Early Cuyler

  

  baseballstud24;1134502 wrote:I got these CHHHHHEEEESSSSEEEEBBBUUURRRGGGEEERRRSSS man...

  hahaha
• gut

  justincredible;1134555 wrote:I'd go way higher than 2 double cheeseburgers.

  Yeah, I'd toss in at least a milkshake.
• chicago510

  

  gut;1134513 wrote:No, entrapment would be approaching her and offering to pay for sex. He never offers that. When she suggested the tip is when she was busted.

  Asking a hooker to have sex with you for money is not entrapment. You have to convince them to commit a crime they weren't readily willing to commit.
  
  Giving someone the opportunity to commit a crime is a sting not entrapment.
  
  Burden of proof in a lot of states is similar to this: “Find this defendant not guilty, if you too, the jury members would have agreed to have sex with this undercover officer for money.”
  
  Or in this case cheeseburgers.
• adog

  chicago510;1134559 wrote:Asking a hooker to have sex with you for money is not entrapment. You have to convince them to commit a crime they weren't readily willing to commit.
  
  Giving someone the opportunity to commit a crime is a sting not entrapment.
  
  Burden of proof in a lot of states is similar to this: “Find this defendant not guilty, if you too, the jury members would have agreed to have sex with this undercover officer for money.”
  
  Or in this case cheeseburgers.

  
  But would this not make the cop guilty of soliciting?
• gut

  chicago510;1134559 wrote: Burden of proof in a lot of states is similar to this: “Find this defendant not guilty, if you too, the jury members would have agreed to have sex with this undercover officer for money.”
  

  Makes sense. I think that's probably a good explanation of the distinction with entrapment. Like if he offers $1M that would be entrapment, but $40 isn't. "Readily willing to commit" really the key criteria.