Most Dominating Sports Franchise?
-
thavoice
If you think a dominating HS is more impressive than domination at the collegiate or pro level then you are nuts. HS you are competing in your division and basically your neck of the woods wherease the other two you are competing nationally with the best of the best.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1060077 wrote:Then add them if you feel so inclined?
Yeah.....one can annoint a team a national championship in HS, but...and especially back in the day, how can ya have even a clue how accurate that is? Few years ago our HS team was ranked nationally. ALot of people were kinda cool with it and touting it. I blew it off becuase how in the hell can some publication really rank HS teams nationally when ya dont play teams outside your general area? I was on a team that finished undefeated and I think 13th in the nation according to the USAToday. When we were told this I was like cool...but a couple of days later I remember teammates and I talking about how taht is even possible ya know for them to accurately rank teams that way. It is a little diff nowadays with the travel and media and seeing teams play on TV and at showcases, but back then it was nothing but stats on a piece of paper. -
like_that
The national titles are impressive, but also to win the Big 10 (easily the toughest wrestling conference) 25 years in a row is just plain ridiculous. You will never see any team in any sport dominate their conference like that again in division 1 sports.justincredible;1060088 wrote:Yeah, I vote this. Easily more impressive than anything else listed. -
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Beating opponents 2,393-168 isn't a written on paper ass whooping... that's owning teams more than your wife owns your testicles.thavoice;1060101 wrote:If you think a dominating HS is more impressive than domination at the collegiate or pro level then you are nuts. HS you are competing in your division and basically your neck of the woods wherease the other two you are competing nationally with the best of the best.
Yeah.....one can annoint a team a national championship in HS, but...and especially back in the day, how can ya have even a clue how accurate that is? Few years ago our HS team was ranked nationally. ALot of people were kinda cool with it and touting it. I blew it off becuase how in the hell can some publication really rank HS teams nationally when ya dont play teams outside your general area? I was on a team that finished undefeated and I think 13th in the nation according to the USAToday. When we were told this I was like cool...but a couple of days later I remember teammates and I talking about how taht is even possible ya know for them to accurately rank teams that way. It is a little diff nowadays with the travel and media and seeing teams play on TV and at showcases, but back then it was nothing but stats on a piece of paper. -
ernest_t_bassZWICK 4 PREZ;1060130 wrote:Beating opponents 2,393-168 isn't a written on paper ass whooping... that's owning teams more than your wife owns your testicles.
-
ZWICK 4 PREZernest_t_bass;1060133 wrote:
-
friendfromlowryI do wonder if the Bulls would have won the '94 and '95 titles had Jordan not retired. Eight straight titles would have been amazing.
-
SnotBubblesZWICK 4 PREZ;1060136 wrote:
-
Devils AdvocateThese are all bullshit.
It has to be the Romans in the Collosium from 12AD to 165 AD
Victory totals of 36,571 to 0. The Christans scored several times, but butseks in the dungions were not official scores. -
ManO'WarWrestling is more of a regional sport. I don't recall the southern teams even having wrestling teams.
So while Iowa is impressive, it doesn't stack up to sports played everywhere.
Besides, I view wrestling as more of an individual sport...like tennis, golf, and track. -
GOONx19UCLA went 206-4 over 7 years. I'll take it.
-
Heretic
Very true. Utter domination over a long period of time that's more impressive than just about anything on this list.like_that;1060002 wrote:This list is a joke without Iowa Wrestling while Gable was coach.
LOL...ZWICK 4 PREZ;1060034 wrote:Obviously it's Paul Browns Massillon Tigers
1935 State Champs
1935 National Champs
1936 State Champs
1936 National Champs
1937 State Champs
1938 State Champs
1939 State Champs
1939 National Champs
1940 State Champs
1940 National Champs
6 State Championships
4 National Championships
58-1-1
Outscored opponents 2,393-168 -
Laley23UCLA then NYY, based on the choices. No other choice really.
-
JawbreakerSince others have brought up d3 schools and hs teams.
Kenyon College Swimming & Diving. 31 straight national championships. -
I Wear Pantslike_that;1060002 wrote:This list is a joke without Iowa Wrestling while Gable was coach.
This.said_aouita;1060042 wrote:I vote Iowa wrestling.
NCAA titles
1975, 1976, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2008, 2009, 2010
Conference titles1958, 1962, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 ,1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010 -
vball10set
you sold me--I change my vote to 'other' :thumbup:said_aouita;1060042 wrote:I vote Iowa wrestling.
NCAA titles
1975, 1976, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2008, 2009, 2010
Conference titles1958, 1962, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 ,1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010 -
royal_kUCLA
-
MulvaI guess UCLA, but it would have been the Bulls had MJ not walked away.
-
bo shemmy3337I voted bulls because they won 6 out of 7 and would have won 7 is Jordan didn't leave IMO. UCLA would be number one but I don't think college teams are franchises.
-
justincredible
It's not wrestling's fault that southerners are pussies.ManO'War;1060168 wrote:Wrestling is more of a regional sport. I don't recall the southern teams even having wrestling teams.
So while Iowa is impressive, it doesn't stack up to sports played everywhere.
Besides, I view wrestling as more of an individual sport...like tennis, golf, and track. -
ManO'WarHey, just be glad there is no such thing as SEC wrestling, or the Big Ten wouldn't be able to compete in that either!
-
dwccrew
This X infinity. 23 national titles and two spans of 8 consecutive titles and 6 consecutive titles. Easily the most impressive. In a sport that has an emphasis on individuals, to be able to dominate as a team makes it that much more impressive. It means the members of the team make each other better by training together everyday.like_that;1060002 wrote:This list is a joke without Iowa Wrestling while Gable was coach.
The SEC can't compete with the B1G, which is why they decided not to have any wrestling. Plus, they can't oversign or break the rules as easily in wrestling like they can in football. And no booster is going to pay $200k for a wrestling recruit like they would Cam Newton.ManO'War;1060410 wrote:Hey, just be glad there is no such thing as SEC wrestling, or the Big Ten wouldn't be able to compete in that either! -
SnotBubblesAlright....which douchebag homer voted for the Steelers?
THE4RINGZ has been here I see... -
SnotBubbles^^^
Derp. I made it a public poll.
Go Pens wins. -
ManO'War
Because nobody really cares except some farmers in Iowa.dwccrew;1060420 wrote: The SEC can't compete with the B1G, which is why they decided not to have any wrestling. Plus, they can't oversign or break the rules as easily in wrestling like they can in football. And no booster is going to pay $200k for a wrestling recruit like they would Cam Newton. -
justincredible
That seems like hyperbole.ManO'War;1060452 wrote:Because nobody really cares except some farmers in Iowa.