Archive

If one more person asks me...

  • power i
    I celebrated CHRISTmas with 50 firefighters tonight. I'm drunk and I think I may have been roofied.
  • Iliketurtles
    rmolin73;1017024 wrote:So now jews and blacks are a religion? I see that OSU degree is paying off.

    Enjoy
    LOL! This might be the best post on the thread... This thread sure did bring in the lulz on a boring Friday night.
  • Iliketurtles
    power i;1017691 wrote:I celebrated CHRISTmas with 50 firefighters tonight. I'm drunk and I think I may have been roofied.
    And how does your husband feel about this?
  • password
    He is the one who roofied her.
  • ohiobucks1
    I have made a donation in ALL of your names to the Human Fund.



    Money for People
  • jmog
    tcarrier32;1017461 wrote:here are the three of the six cited studies. i don't expect you to read them, or to have read them. my point being that your opinion "as a scientist" is met with overwhelming disagreement. you might not be wrong, abiogenesis is something to still be dealt with, however there has never been a supernatural explanation needed before. unlikely one is needed in this instance.

    <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16701238" target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16701238
    <a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/2410209" target="_blank">http://www.jstor.org/pss/2410209
    http://www.jstor.org/pss/2409766


    I hate to break it to you, but I am fully aware of speciation, but speciation is not the macro-evolution I have been talking about. Mutations over generations have lead to new breeds/species of dogs, people have known how to do this for a couple hundred years. Same with those studies from different insects, etc.

    The type of macro-evolution that has NOT been observed, is the things they teach as fact still, a fish becoming a frog, a frog becoming a reptile, a reptile becoming a bird or a small mammal.

    Major class changes of animals, that is the macro-evolution I have been talking about the whole time. Speciation is no different than the first article you cited, it is just a little farther along than the first article.

    You can put the "as a scientist" in quotes all you want to try to be sarcastic or passive aggressive all you like, but I have the degrees and published papers to back it up.