Archive

Bank of America Plans $5/month Fee for Using Debit Cards .

  • OneBuckeye
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204138204576600800330404330.html

    Doh. This is almost as bad as paying $12 a year for a minor league website. Justin, start a bank now!
  • OneBuckeye
    Oh and for those that don't read the article. Chase and Wells Fargo aren't far behind...
  • ts1227
    OneBuckeye;916772 wrote:Oh and for those that don't read the article. Chase and Wells Fargo aren't far behind...

    I have Chase, and will move to Huntington if it happens. Huntington seems to be reeling in customers by holding off on this stuff (see them reintroducing a completely free account earlier this year).
  • justincredible
    Absurd. I hope they lose every customer.
  • THE4RINGZ
    justincredible;916784 wrote:Absurd. I hope they lose every customer.



    +1
  • WebFire
    ts1227;916775 wrote:I have Chase, and will move to Huntington if it happens. Huntington seems to be reeling in customers by holding off on this stuff (see them reintroducing a completely free account earlier this year).
    Yep, reel them in and then start charging. ;)
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Not to take this to the politics forum, but this is fallout from the Dodd-Frank provision that capped bank fees on merchants for debt card transactions. That was a colossal form of revenue so instead of collecting from the merchants these cash-strapped banks now are aiming directly at the consumer. I can imagine cardholders being angry.
  • gorocks99
    Joke's on them, I'll just pay in cash or CC :)
  • OneBuckeye
    If they charge me I will make make as many small purchases with my debit card as possbile. Hooray for .50 mcdonalds cones.
  • I Wear Pants
    Manhattan Buckeye;916803 wrote:Not to take this to the politics forum, but this is fallout from the Dodd-Frank provision that capped bank fees on merchants for debt card transactions. That was a colossal form of revenue so instead of collecting from the merchants these cash-strapped banks now are aiming directly at the consumer. I can imagine cardholders being angry.
    Oh no, the poor cash-strapped banks!
  • dlazz
    I use a Credit Union.
  • LJ
    OneBuckeye;916750 wrote:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204138204576600800330404330.html

    Doh. This is almost as bad as paying $12 a year for a minor league website. Justin, start a bank now!
    Thanks for posting a link that you have to subscribe to read

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-of-America-plans-to-cnnm-3257381726.html?x=0
  • Pick6
    Glad I have Huntington. Stupid move.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    I Wear Pants;916818 wrote:Oh no, the poor cash-strapped banks!
    If it makes you feel better they are all too big to fail. Assuming you can read a balance sheet I'll be happy to post their quarterly results and cash position. These banks are in big trouble. They haven't recovered from the '07 credit crunch and '08 crash and they are sucking wind.

    This whole thing about the economy being in terrible shape isn't a figment of imagination. There are actually real numbers behind the mess. Some fortune 100 companies are doing well be slimming down and selling off inventory - banks aren't among this group. The entire industry is a disaster, having record low interest rates isn't helping their bottom line.
  • thavoice
    but if you only use it to take out cash then they wont charge you!

    How nice of them.


    I would bolt if I was a customer. The use of debit cards has replaced checks for most people. Banks want to talk about the costs and what another poster said on on here, but what about the savings they should be seeing from the less checks they have to handle, process, scan, etc?
  • Scarlet_Buckeye
    If Charter One ever starts this kind of crap, I'm out.
  • Nate
    LJ;916836 wrote:Thanks for posting a link that you have to subscribe to read

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-of-America-plans-to-cnnm-3257381726.html?x=0
    You must be an idiot because the previous link worked perfect for me.
  • Nate
    Also, this is great news for the business I work for!
  • Iliketurtles
    Yeah the WSJ link worked for me as well.

    As for them doing this Im not surprised I'm actually surprised this hasn't already happened.
  • Nate
    We got an article at work the other day that stated that CitiBank I believe it was is going to start charging people $20/mo if they don't hold more than $1,500 in their account & if they don't have a checking account w/ direct deposit.
  • Commander of Awesome
    justincredible;916784 wrote:Absurd. I hope they lose every customer.
    I know my coworker is already switching banks because of this. I think he's switching to navy credit union.
  • justincredible
    Commander of Awesome;916900 wrote:I know my coworker is already switching banks because of this. I think he's switching to navy credit union.
    Good. I would've switched the day they announced this bullshit.
  • thavoice
    Ive been with a local bank since 1991 and I like it. Sometimes they are slower on the technology and such but for the most part they dont have alot of this BS.

    I think all I need is 100 in the bank to get free checking and savings.

    Chase wanted alot more when I opened an acct there, but since my mortgage is there that was sufficient enough to get free accounts.
  • QuakerOats
    You can thank Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, liberal hacks and sponsors of the Dodd-Frank financial 'reform' (NOT) bill. This is just another piece of massive and wreckless regulation that does nothing to address too-big-to-fail, but burdens all banks, including community banks, and will lead to all types of other fee enhancements in order for the banks to survive. Once again, liberalism generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.

    Change we can believe in ........
  • ts1227
    ^^ this fucking guy...