I've been fired from the huddle

• justincredible

  

  se-alum wrote: I hope you didn't really waste your time doing this.

  Lol, I hope they did. That would please me.
• Heretic

  

  I hope by "quick scan", he read through every single thread on this forum and wrote down exactly what percentage of posts concerned the old site.
• ytownfootball

  

  justincredible wrote: Also, I'd venture that the number of posts on this individual forum that aren't about JJHuddle are close to the total amount of posts on all of JJHuddle since the site went pay to play.

  I'd venture a guess that all the posts that are about JJHuddle equal all the post on that site...
  
  Cricketts can't type
• hoops23

  

  FAIL
• Nate

  LTrain23 wrote:

  Fail.
• hoops23

  

  
  
  
  
  hmmm, the picture showed up on the thread for a good minute lol...
• justincredible

  

  behindthelense wrote: A quick scan of all 47 pages revealed over 4000 posts on threads directly mentioning JJ, JJHuddle, or the "old Huddle". This doesn't include any posts on other threads, and I probably missed a few threads, too.
  
  Not to hard to imagine that the 20% that I found could easily be as much as 25% of all posts on the board that are directly tied to comments and ridicule about the other site.
  
  Just sayin'

  Here are the numbers I found (searching the entire website, not just this forum):
  
  Posts mentioning "JJ" (which would include just JJ and also JJHuddle: ~1755
  Posts mentioning "other huddle": 103
  Posts mentioning "old huddle": less than 100
  
  That means of the 61k+ posts on this site, 3% of them mention JJhuddle.
  
  I need to see your math.
• ts1227

  

  I was to understand there would be no math
• Heretic

  

  Uh-oh, Justin's outgeeking behindthelense! This could get crazy up in here!
• Nate

  I ran out of fingers and toes.
• justincredible

  

  Ah, now I see what you are saying. Of the specific threads about JJHuddle there are 4000+ posts total.
• hasbeen

  

  j_crazy wrote:

  ytownfootball wrote:

  j_crazy wrote:

  se-alum wrote:

  my guess would be ches leaving here saved his ass there.

  'Peake was dismissed as well.

  wait, I thought (base on my own deductions) that ytowngirl, zam and cats05 (Tim Tebow) were the 3.

  Today, 10:54 AM Post: #12
  Ytowngirlinfla
  Accelerate my life!
  Posts: 69
  Joined: Nov 2009
  Location: Great Lakes, Illinois
  
  RE: I've been fired from the huddle
  chesapeake, sej and zambrown were the ones it went to also.

  
  my bad, should have read more thoroughly.
  
  

  Thank you for that picture. I'm going to try to make it my avatar.

  justincredible wrote:

  behindthelense wrote: A quick scan of all 47 pages revealed over 4000 posts on threads directly mentioning JJ, JJHuddle, or the "old Huddle". This doesn't include any posts on other threads, and I probably missed a few threads, too.
  
  Not to hard to imagine that the 20% that I found could easily be as much as 25% of all posts on the board that are directly tied to comments and ridicule about the other site.
  
  Just sayin'

  Here are the numbers I found (searching the entire website, not just this forum):
  
  Posts mentioning "JJ" (which would include just JJ and also JJHuddle: ~1755
  Posts mentioning "other huddle": 103
  Posts mentioning "old huddle": less than 100
  
  That means of the 61k+ posts on this site, 3% of them mention JJhuddle.
  
  I need to see your math.

  ts1227 wrote: I was to understand there would be no math

  I'm with ts. This is a no thinking place. Only un-backed up opinions.
  
  
  Oh and blue, would you be offended by a Ralphie May retard joke?
• zambrown

  

  Why would anyone waste their time figuring out how many posts referred to ##, or ######## or even ### ### ######? Geeeesh.
• hasbeen

  

  zambrown wrote: Why would anyone waste their time figuring out how many posts referred to ##, or ######## or even ### ### ######? Geeeesh.

  Serious Business zam, enough said.
• zambrown

  

  So nice to see you back, pnhasbeen! It's been much too long.
• hasbeen

  

  zambrown wrote: So nice to see you back, pnhasbeen! It's been much too long.

  Oh I was with you over on the old place, just never told you who I was every time i had to get a new name.
• Tigerfan00

  

  Damn it, I lost count
• zambrown

  

  pnhasbeen wrote:

  zambrown wrote: So nice to see you back, pnhasbeen! It's been much too long.

  Oh I was with you over on the old place, just never told you who I was every time i had to get a new name.

  Happened often, did it?
• GoChiefs

  

  Tigerfan00 wrote: Damn it, I lost count

  7
• SQ_Crazies

  

  What the hell is the problem with a lot of the posts on here being about the old site anyways? A huge majority of us came from there--this site wouldn't have started if they wouldn't have screwed us and it's still relatively new. Obviously it was going to be a hot topic for awhile...
• BRF

  

  ttt
  
  Pah ha ha ha!
  
  I had a feeling certain mods would get the boot for posting "over there"!
• Nate

  SQ_Crazies wrote: What the hell is the problem with a lot of the posts on here being about the old site anyways? A huge majority of us came from there--this site wouldn't have started if they wouldn't have screwed us and it's still relatively new. Obviously it was going to be a hot topic for awhile...

  In about two months, we won't even remember PayPay.
• justincredible

  

  Keebler wrote: In about two months, we won't even remember PayPay.

  Shit, in two months freehuddle won't even exist. This place is on life support as it is.
• wes_mantooth

  

  justincredible wrote:

  Keebler wrote: In about two months, we won't even remember PayPay.

  Shit, in two months freehuddle won't even exist. This place is on life support as it is.

  Agreed. I am already looking for a better alternative. This place is run by a Hitler wannabe.
• GoChiefs

  

  wes_mantooth wrote: This place is run by a Hitler wannabe.

  Hitler ain't got nothin' on that asshole.