Banned.

• sleeper

  

  Yeah debating with either LJ or C4F is like debating with the judge and jury. You could be 100% right in every way but if you hurt the judge/jury feelz than you get the ban hammer. That's the problem with LJ and C4F, they abuse their mod power and play favorites. Why does Justin allow this? :thumbdown:
• ernest_t_bass

  

  like_that;1423325 wrote:Just like the time you got punished for the same thing? /sarcasm

  I should have. I won't argue that.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  DeyDurkie5;1423447 wrote:Honestly, it's true. As much as those guys were the true definitions of phags, they at least brought some much need new posts to this site. When rock, newark, non, etc were posting, it was at least entertaining to go back and forth with them. Now it's "post thread, fly4fail tries to argue some stupid point like how do we know the gay man liked penis? was their penis in his mouth? Did they do a DNA check for semen on his mouth? I need to see said picture of a penis in his mouth before I can know if this guy is gay or not", people get banned for not agreeing with fly4fail."

  Reps. Spot on anaylsis, would read again.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  ernest_t_bass;1423449 wrote:I should have. I won't argue that.

  Better hope QQ4F doesn't see the post. He'll retro bant you like he did to DW.
• Heretic

  

  sleeper;1423410 wrote:Completely forgot about you amid the C4F/LJ fiasco. HEY JUSTIN, YOUR MODS ARE DOUCHEBAGS. :thumbup:

  You might be right. Because under the "it takes one to know one" statute, no one in this world would be more equipped to call someone a douchebag than you.
• ernest_t_bass

  

  like_that;1423424 wrote:ETB has once posted my photo, and another time posted my personal information on this site and the following happened:
  
  1. Justin deleted the photo, and told him not to do it again...
  
  2. Justin said it was ok for ETB to post my personal information, because I am mean to ETB and I hurt his little feelz.

  1. That one is true
  
  2. That one is not true. It was "OK," because it was information that YOU put on the OC.
• mcburg93

  

  ts1227;1423407 wrote:You and about 5 others would have been permabanned 2 years ago on any other board. We can make that favoritism of a select few go away

  With this logic there would only be about two moderators left if the moderators of this site were on any other board.
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Commander of Awesome;1423439 wrote:RDI was vocally anti C4F while ETB wasn't.

  I've had my fair share of posts expressing my displeasure for C4F. Not on sleeper levels, but I have.
• GoChiefs

  

  Commander of Awesome;1423439 wrote:wasn't even infracted.

  
  How do you know? That's not public knowledge.
• thavoice

  ernest_t_bass;1423456 wrote:I've had my fair share of posts expressing my displeasure for C4F. Not on sleeper levels, but I have.

  Now fights between you two about whom hogged the sheets or left the toilet seat up dont really count.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  GoChiefs;1423457 wrote:How do you know? That's not public knowledge.

  Was posted by Justin. The post was just deleted and he was told to cut it out.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  ernest_t_bass;1423456 wrote:I've had my fair share of posts expressing my displeasure for C4F. Not on sleeper levels, but I have.

  I created a thread bout a year ago or so with a poll about what a DB QQ4F was. You posted that you haven't had run ins with him and didn't see the big fuss. Guess your tune has changed.
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Commander of Awesome;1423463 wrote:I created a thread bout a year ago or so with a poll about what a DB QQ4F was. You posted that you haven't had run ins with him and didn't see the big fuss. Guess your tune has changed.

  Indeed. In the past, I had never had any qualms with him. Since then, I've definitely changed my tune.
• Heretic

  

  ernest_t_bass;1423464 wrote:Indeed. In the past, I had never had any qualms with him. Since then, I've definitely changed my tune.

  Is this actually an "I had problems/run-ins with him" sort of issue. Or an "I might get cool points and not made fun of as much if I pile on!" sort of issue?
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Heretic;1423472 wrote:Is this actually an "I had problems/run-ins with him" sort of issue. Or an "I might get cool points and not made fun of as much if I pile on!" sort of issue?

  Definitely cool kids stuff, bro.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Heretic;1423472 wrote:Is this actually an "I had problems/run-ins with him" sort of issue. Or an "I might get cool points and not made fun of as much if I pile on!" sort of issue?

  How many "cool points" do you get for this post?
• justincredible

  

  Commander of Awesome;1423477 wrote:How many "cool points" do you get for this post?

  
  Four
• sleeper

  

  Heretic;1423453 wrote:You might be right. Because under the "it takes one to know one" statute, no one in this world would be more equipped to call someone a douchebag than you.

  Makes sense. See LJ. He's been everything. Don't believe me? Just ask him! :thumbup:
• Curly J

  

  justincredible;1423478 wrote:Threve

  /FIFY
• thavoice

  Curly J;1423487 wrote:/FIFY

  Sure it wouldnt be 1th?
• Heretic

  

  justincredible;1423478 wrote:Four

  ONLY FOUR?!?!?! DAMNIT!!!!
• justincredible

  

  Heretic;1423493 wrote:ONLY FOUR?!?!?! DAMNIT!!!!

  Two.
• Heretic

  

  justincredible;1423500 wrote:Two.

  Damn...I'm soon gonna be getting negative-cool points, aren't I?
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Heretic;1423503 wrote:Damn...I'm soon gonna be getting negative-cool points, aren't I?

  - ∞
• Heretic

  

  ernest_t_bass;1423522 wrote:- ∞

  There's no coming back from that, is there?