Need a cabinet position .... no experience necessary
-
Bigdogg
You are correct. That why I voted against them all and I will do the same again if I need to.Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
Do you mean like Bush fooled all of those Ivy league educated Dems, into believing that Iraq, at one time, possesed WMD? If that's the case, the Dems in Congress were nothing but sheep.Bigdogg wrote:
Actually he should have stated it was a rebuttal to the so called "facts" that certain posters on here get from the Republican party who are notorious for making shit up and fooling a great majority of the sheep in this Country.ptown_trojans_1 wrote:
lol, didn't even notice I said that. Thanks. Kind of an oxymoron ha. Should be a rebuttal to the information provided.Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
rebuttal to the facts Now that is hilarious....ptown_trojans_1 wrote: Note, AEI is notoriously conservative think tank.
And here is the rebuttal to the facts:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/dec/02/glenn-beck/beck-says-less-10-percent-obama-cabinet-members-ha/
It really matters what the cabinet position is to really define if private sector experience is needed. So, I take the numbers with some caution.
I'd also add that the numbers are from November and since then Congress has approved more, not sure how many more, but more lower level cabinet officials.
Why did you vote for sheep???????????