Archive

Seth Rich .... just not going away DNC

  • isadore
    QuakerOats;1865132 wrote:is he part of the Clinton body count?
  • Belly35
    Even the nose ring democrate cant let this issue take a pass ...... Wonder why.......Just not going way .....
  • Spock
    Belly35;1865188 wrote:Even the nose ring democrate cant let this issue take a pass ...... Wonder why.......Just not going way .....
    they are trying to deflect from the truth. They know that the info that Fox is peddling is likely truth
  • QuakerOats
    Why the bleaching of drives and servers?

    Why does Wasserman desperately want her wrecked computer back from the wire fraudster?

    When will the real crimes be investigated?
  • gut
    QuakerOats;1865223 wrote: Why does Wasserman desperately want her wrecked computer back from the wire fraudster?
    Usually the simplest explanation is best. I think it's obvious that the hacking crime was done and over, but not all of the damaging emails - including possible criminality - were hacked/released. Basically the same reasons Hillary was running a private server. And I don't know if there's a lot more to the "screw Bernie" angle that, as DNC, there's potential election fraud.

    You don't invite the cops into your home with marijuana everywhere just because someone smashed your window.
  • Belly35
    QuakerOats;1865223 wrote:Why the bleaching of drives and servers?

    Why does Wasserman desperately want her wrecked computer back from the wire fraudster?

    When will the real crimes be investigated?
    Huma classifed information e mails with porn on a laptop in the hands of a Weiner
  • isadore
    Spock;1865205 wrote:they are trying to deflect from the truth. They know that the info that Fox is peddling is likely truth
  • QuakerOats
    Assassinated ........................not robbed, mugged, assaulted, or roughed up.
  • salto
    Spock;1865205 wrote:they are trying to deflect from the truth. They know that the info that Fox is peddling is likely truth
    Yup, I'm sure that is it.



    [h=1]"Special Counsel Robert Mueller Impanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe[/h][h=2]Expansion beyond Flynn grand jury is a sign the investigation in election meddling is ramping up"[/h]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/special-counsel-mueller-impanels-washington-grand-jury-in-russia-probe-1501788287
  • Spock
    salto;1865320 wrote:Yup, I'm sure that is it.



    [h=1]"Special Counsel Robert Mueller Impanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe[/h][h=2]Expansion beyond Flynn grand jury is a sign the investigation in election meddling is ramping up"[/h]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/special-counsel-mueller-impanels-washington-grand-jury-in-russia-probe-1501788287
    Be careful what you wish for. The Clintons and the DNC isn't going to look good after this grand jury.
  • salto
    Spock;1865345 wrote:Be careful what you wish for. The Clintons and the DNC isn't going to look good after this grand jury.
    Clinton isn't the President.

    Hope this helps.
  • Spock
    salto;1865347 wrote:Clinton isn't the President.

    Hope this helps.
    You do realize that the meeting was about Clinton and the dnc. The evidence will show the true collusion by the dems to rig a election. Their own.
  • salto
    Spock;1865348 wrote:You do realize that the meeting was about Clinton and the dnc. The evidence will show the true collusion by the dems to rig a election. Their own.

    Thanks Hannity.
  • Spock
    salto;1865350 wrote:Thanks Hannity.
    Wouldn't know. I don't get fox news.
  • salto
    "Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"

    I'm sure you're right and it's really about Clinton and the dems.
  • Spock
    salto;1865361 wrote:"Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"

    I'm sure you're right and it's really about Clinton and the dems.
    You do realize that trump and his financial ties are off P.O. it's to the probe? They aren't getting his tax returns or anything like that.
  • salto
    Spock;1865369 wrote:You do realize that trump and his financial ties are off P.O. it's to the probe? They aren't getting his tax returns or anything like that.
    You're wrong.

    Hope this helps.

    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/31/could-the-russia-investigation-reveal-trumps-tax-returns-215212
  • Spock
    lots of "could", "possibly" and other words that mean this article is a nothing burger
  • QuakerOats
    salto;1865361 wrote:"Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"


    ooh, scary
  • Spock
    salto;1865361 wrote:"Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"

    I'm sure you're right and it's really about Clinton and the dems.
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/08/04/ten-shocking-things-know-right-now-about-democrats-big-it-scandal.html

    here is what they should be investigating
  • Spock
    salto;1865361 wrote:"Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"

    I'm sure you're right and it's really about Clinton and the dems.
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/04/sessions-unveiling-leak-crackdown-on-heels-transcript-bombshell.html

    here is the real crimes in DC.
  • ptown_trojans_1
    The Transcripts were "probably" Reince if I had to guess, or someone else that was recently let go. I'm not a fan of phone calls between leaders leaking. But, such is the nature of DC.
    Also, I think the DOJ will be surprised who some of the leakers probably are. I'm guessing Jared/ Ivanka and Bannon are leakers for some stories. If someone does not like how a policy is turning out or is upset with someone in the West Wing, they leak the story.
    I doubt the President is going to press on his family or Bannon...

    Also, if this is the case, does that mean no one in the White House can speak at all to the press even on background, even if it is a policy the President supports?
  • QuakerOats
    It is one thing to leak drivel about White House machinations; it is another thing to leak (and publish) items that go to national security. Hopefully some people will end up in jail.




    Draining the swamp is never easy.
  • ppaw1999
  • ptown_trojans_1
    QuakerOats;1865454 wrote:It is one thing to leak drivel about White House machinations; it is another thing to leak (and publish) items that go to national security. Hopefully some people will end up in jail.




    Draining the swamp is never easy.
    I guess it depends on how they define "National Security" which is a very, very broad term.
    I'll still say leaks happen, always have and always will. It is a part of the free press. There will always be some loser in a policy argument that will leak a story to the Times or Post. Whether it is Watergate, the Pentagon Papers, Iran Contra, Wikileaks, Stuxnet, or these transcripts, things get out.