"Fair share"

• O-Trap

  

  like_that;1850193 wrote:Pretty much my thoughts as well. I think its a good start though. I will never complain about putting more money into the people's hands, because they at least know how to spend their money better than the Government does.

  Yeah, this is the part I was referring to when I said tax cuts are easy to get behind, and for the very reason you mentioned.
  
  However, if the tax cuts aren't coupled with comparable spending cuts, the nation's governance will become bankrupt, and all that money that has been put back into the people's hands will have little value.
  
  Honestly, this has been my biggest motivation to get into cryptocurrencies, because they inherently don't rely on an entity with the ability to manipulate them to the same degree (or the incentive to do so).
• justincredible

  

  O-Trap;1850206 wrote:Honestly, this has been my biggest motivation to get into cryptocurrencies, because they inherently don't rely on an entity with the ability to manipulate them to the same degree (or the incentive to do so).

  I'm loaded with dogecoin.
• CenterBHSFan

  

  like_that;1850202 wrote:Yeah I know. I was just trying to move it along to a discussion with people who are legitimately trying to discuss it, instead of sleeper banging the drum with his 2-3 recycled arguments.

  I certainly agree with this too.
• gut

  sleeper;1850154 wrote:Let's be real, the government isn't going to cut spending. The tax cuts will be paid for by future generations. This is the classic GOP economic strategy; cut taxes and increase spending.

  You are 100% correct. However, tax "cuts" don't have to necessarily mean less revenue. And I don't agree that's the right measure. Repubs spend a little less, tax a little less. Dems tax a little more and spend a lot more. I'm not sure who is worse.