400 million dollars wee-wee'd away

• Belly35

  

  Community organizer 400 million dollars was ransom money everybody knows it don't lie
  
  Hey Detroit the Obama Administration give you cell phones you chumps can you just imagine what four hundred million would have meant to you for hunger food shelter paying your bills provide lunches for schools help heat your homes but instead you settle for cell phones and the Iranians settle for four hundred million dollars
  
  I know that four hundred million dollars in the big scheme of things is not a lot of money but think about how many student loans that could have helped and the people it could have help for scholarships but instead your community organizer decided to pay the Iranians to make his happy ass look good and you got suckered
  
  Just think you gay and lesbians that four hundred million dollars will go to building taller buildings to throw you off of is that really a good use for that money
  
  I hope you all can tell that there's a lot of harsh and sarcasm in my comment sorry if I offended anybody but this is typically what the Democrats Hillary Clinton Obama John karrie and the rest of the political assholes do they piss our money away for the good of themselves and not for the public
  
  What other things could four hundred million dollars have done to help our country rather than trying to make the legacy of Obama look better
• Heretic

  

  You do remember the whole early-site dealie about not profaning in thread titles, don't you? You're welcome for changing it for you, though!
• HitsRus

  

  The word that I'm thinking he used is profanity?... Ehhh maybe on JJ Huddle. In any case, "wee-wee'd" is a poor term to use to describe the incident because it implies that the money was spent frivolously. A ransom is not frivolous.
• isadore

  gosh it was not paying ransom, it was returning Iran, money owed it. Now if wanted something despicable, we could look back to St. Ronnie and his trading arms for hostages with Iran violating the law and directly putting Americans and our allies at risk.
• HitsRus

  

  John and Anne live in a neighbor hood and Bob and Sue are friends of theirs...Bob gives John $400 dollars to build him a new barbecue grill.
  Soon after, and before the grill is built, Sue and Bob split, and she kicks Bob out of the house and takes up with Mike. Sue, with Mike leading the way,proceed to blame John and Anne for all their household problems and relations between the couples are so strained, even the kid's toys that were left at Mike and Sue's house are forfeit.
  Mike and Sue continually bad mouth John and Anne and "sponsor" little things that surreptitiously happen to them and their friends in the neighborhood.
  After a while, John and Anne decide to use the money that Bob gave them to reimburse the kids for the toys confiscated after the split.
  Many years go by with Mike and Sue continuing their antics.
  Mike and Sue even kidnap Anne's cat that had inadvertently wandered into their yard!
  
  One day, and without asking Anne, takes $400 out of their checking account (household money that could have been used for some much needed things)and pays Mike and Sue to get their cat back.
  Anne is pissed. " you spent $400 of the money we need to fix our house for our own cat?"
  John says, " Do you remember that money that Bob gave me for the grill 35 years ago?...I leveraged it to get back our kitty!"
  
  :RpS_wub::RpS_angry::RpS_blink:
• Automatik

  

  Belly - why are you unable to convey your message at a 5th grade level?
• Heretic

  

  HitsRus;1809357 wrote:The word that I'm thinking he used is profanity?... Ehhh maybe on JJ Huddle. In any case, "wee-wee'd" is a poor term to use to describe the incident because it implies that the money was spent frivolously. A ransom is not frivolous.

  #1: That came up once in the early-ish days of the site when Justin was admin and was taking an active interest in growing the site, where (if memory serves), the decision was made to err on the side of caution since it's only a thread title and that's no reason to risk the wrath of adsense or whatever the reason for the rule was in the first place.
  
  #2: On one hand I agree with you re: "wee-wee'd". On the other thread, when you have a topic that's been (and is being) discussed at length on another thread and someone starts their own thread to give their opinion and types said opinion in a barely coherent manner, that's the definition of "frivolous".