Trump vs. Hillary (NO OTHER OPTIONS)
-
rocketalumsleeper;1819340 wrote:I am not thrilled about HRC. She's probably the most corrupt candidate ever to run for office.
But with Trump in the mix, I simply don't want him representing me to anyone ever. I'll hold my nose and vote for her just to keep him out and hope the GOP grows up and starts moving back to the middle(or sanity).
And you're both free to do that. You can use your vote however you want. Yay America! Maybe we are still kind of great.bases_loaded;1819345 wrote:Trolls gonna troll. That is all. Both are shit candidates, but I could care less about being wrong in my choice. I would rather pick the loser than help to allow the most corrupt person to ever hold public office be awarded the top seat in government. -
bases_loaded
-
gut
Well, yeah, but that's a bombshell....if for no other reason that it demonstrates pertinent emails were deliberately excluded (i.e. obstruction)bases_loaded;1819352 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/fbi-reopens-clinton-email-server-investigation-230454
too late to matter
Or it's Comey trying to recover from the perception the administration steamrolled him. -
sleeper
Time will tell.gut;1819358 wrote:Well, yeah, but that's a bombshell....if for no other reason that it demonstrates pertinent emails were deliberately excluded (i.e. obstruction)
Or it's Comey trying to recover from the perception the administration steamrolled him. -
jedbartlet02
Seems to be the popular opinion right nowgut;1819358 wrote:Well, yeah, but that's a bombshell....if for no other reason that it demonstrates pertinent emails were deliberately excluded (i.e. obstruction)
Or it's Comey trying to recover from the perception the administration steamrolled him. -
QuakerOatsbases_loaded;1819287 wrote:Only one side has a history of violence this election cycle....it's not Trump's you fucking dolt.
Thank you. Can you imagine if Trump wins how much DNC-purchased violence will ensue; I don't know if they will be able to find enough people to hire as rent-a-mobs.
Once again though, this is precisely from Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals: accuse the other side of doing exactly what you are actually doing. Fucking incredible. -
QuakerOatsjedbartlet02;1819285 wrote:You cannot be serious?
Are you some kind of rookie or something? If you are unable to determine whether Clinton Inc. is exponentially more criminal than Watergate ever was, then you should not be allowed to vote. God save the republic. -
QuakerOatsHeretic;1819292 wrote:Of cooouuuurrrrsssssseeeeee. Anyone with the base intellect to do a Google search can see within moments that both sides have had incidents of violence, but whatever it takes to get through life, eh?
Obviously did not take the time to watch Veritas videos, but is an expert at Google. -
QuakerOatsAutomatik;1819299 wrote:I've seen enough from both sides. When will you realize they are both equally garbage?
They are not equal. One is a criminal at the highest levels of government and an obstructor of justice. The other said some mean things. -
AutomatikThey're the same to me...garbage.
Bipartisan system....garbage. -
jedbartlet02
I'm going to explain this real slow to you so you understand QuakerQuakerOats;1819403 wrote:Are you some kind of rookie or something? If you are unable to determine whether Clinton Inc. is exponentially more criminal than Watergate ever was, then you should not be allowed to vote. God save the republic.
The reason Watergate is worse is Richard Nixon was the SITTING POTUS and used the highest levels of our government to destroy his "enemy list" -
thavoiceAt first I thought those ads for Clinton were effective when all they were was Trump saying some of those crazy things.
but the more I see them, the more I start to wonder and think that hell, maybe we need a leader like that where it wont be all patty-cake with everyone around the world. Many agree that we want a non career politician to get a shot. All being a career politician does is gives a candidate practice on how to dance around subjects and learn the ropes of what to and not to say.
I am not a big Trump fan, but maybe, just maybe......someone like that is what is needed. -
QuakerOatsjedbartlet02;1819409 wrote:I'm going to explain this real slow to you so you understand Quaker
The reason Watergate is worse is Richard Nixon was the SITTING POTUS and used the highest levels of our government to destroy his "enemy list"
Thank you. Keep you head buried in the sand. -
QuakerOatsthavoice;1819413 wrote:At first I thought those ads for Clinton were effective when all they were was Trump saying some of those crazy things.
but the more I see them, the more I start to wonder and think that hell, maybe we need a leader like that where it wont be all patty-cake with everyone around the world. Many agree that we want a non career politician to get a shot. All being a career politician does is gives a candidate practice on how to dance around subjects and learn the ropes of what to and not to say.
I am not a big Trump fan, but maybe, just maybe......someone like that is what is needed.
An awful lot of people agree. -
Dr Winston O'BoogieWhat a cap off to the most horrible election cycle we've had in my lifetime. We now have one candidate under investigation by the FBI and the other a narcissistic buffoon. Holy hell.
-
O-Trap
Don't forget that the 'narcissistic buffoon' (I think this applies to both of them) also has an upcoming trial.Dr Winston O'Boogie;1819453 wrote:What a cap off to the most horrible election cycle we've had in my lifetime. We now have one candidate under investigation by the FBI and the other a narcissistic buffoon. Holy hell.
What a world ... -
Dr Winston O'Boogie
True DatO-Trap;1819455 wrote:Don't forget that the 'narcissistic buffoon' (I think this applies to both of them) also has an upcoming trial.
What a world ... -
QuakerOatsDr Winston O'Boogie;1819453 wrote:What a cap off to the most horrible election cycle we've had in my lifetime. We now have one candidate under investigation by the FBI and the other a narcissistic buffoon. Holy hell.
Pretty crazy. Who knows, maybe we will all come to know and love him, and he'll do a great job. -
bases_loaded
Honest question. How much input other than putting his name on things do you think he has in most of his companies?O-Trap;1819455 wrote:Don't forget that the 'narcissistic buffoon' (I think this applies to both of them) also has an upcoming trial.
What a world ...
Follow up, if he had anything criminal about him, wouldn't the DNC and media exposed it months ago? -
Heretic
When he rebounds from losing and decides to kill the pain with another season of The Apprentice -- where's he's a big man and no one can say anything back to him? Perhaps.QuakerOats;1819466 wrote:Pretty crazy. Who knows, maybe we will all come to know and love him, and he'll do a great job. -
bases_loadedhttp://www.allenbwest.com/michellejesse/chilling-fbi-reopens-hillary-case-look-happens-campaign-plane
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
jedbartlet02http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-entities-family-rank-high-as-vendors-to-campaign-1477686100
So he's using campaign money to pay himself and his kids?
Isn't that illegal? -
jedbartlet02bases_loaded;1819471 wrote:http://www.allenbwest.com/michellejesse/chilling-fbi-reopens-hillary-case-look-happens-campaign-plane
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Come on man....you're better than this -
superman
If it was illegal, CNN would be reporting this 24/7.jedbartlet02;1819759 wrote:http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-entities-family-rank-high-as-vendors-to-campaign-1477686100
So he's using campaign money to pay himself and his kids?
Isn't that illegal? -
gut
He's given at least 6X that personally to his campaign.....if the goal was to enrich his family, it would have been cheaper just to give them the money and not run for office.jedbartlet02;1819759 wrote:http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-entities-family-rank-high-as-vendors-to-campaign-1477686100
So he's using campaign money to pay himself and his kids?
Isn't that illegal?